member 147413
Guest
I would do something similar.Unless McDavid wants out, I doubt Oilers bite. Matthews + Nylander + Dermott might get them interested IMO.
Matthews + 1st + Dermott
Nylander for Pesce+
I would do something similar.Unless McDavid wants out, I doubt Oilers bite. Matthews + Nylander + Dermott might get them interested IMO.
I think we've been saying he's had bad puck luck/poor shooting % for 3 seasons now.
That would be a hell of an add, I don't know if we'd get both without an addition on our side.
He's had 2 60 point seasons on his ECL for **** sakes
I remember the Steen trade, go for it, you guys deserve what you get
I consider Pesce more valuable then Lee Stempniak to be fair and his production whenever he's away from Matthews hasn't been all that special.
Top 6 FWD for top 4D.
At some point, defense needs attention.
Average top 4D for kid with borderline elite production on his ECL
This is a spectacularly bad idea, I'd laugh if it wasn't my team your wanting to **** over
Except he's on a big boy contract now not producing like an elite player.
30 point production and great defense is a pretty good top 4 defenseman.
Except he's on a big boy contract now not producing like an elite player.
30 point production and great defense is a pretty good top 4 defenseman.
I honestly can believe this, so were trading him because of one half season after a holdout with brutal puck luck at his lowest possible value over the last 3 years?
You think that's the intelligent thing to do, do you?
Pesce is a decent 2nd pairing defenseman, nothing more
Pesce would obviously come with a plus, and Dubas would have to back out of his "no-trade" promise with Nylander.
At the same time, you could just swap Kadri for Pesce one-for-one. I think both teams would take that. Maybe a small sweetner that is no big deal.
Of course, this probably means Zaitsev gets dealt for futures somewhere. He could generate a good amount of interest given the way he's picked things up in the second half, and given that he was pretty good in the first half as well. Plus it is not like the UFA market is full of great RD options, and the few that are will be drastically overpaid most likely. Zaitsev's contract would likely be a steal comparatively.
Also, personal opinion, but I think Oz is dealt to give him a shot elsewhere. I have him packaged up with Kaskisuo to open up a contract spot and to get maybe a late round pick in return (in that scenario, to Tampa). I have Liljegren on the bottom pairing, and then having Holl as his competition. I think Holl loses most likely, and in that case he just ends up being a cheap #8 again.
I would do something similar.
Matthews + 1st + Dermott
Nylander for Pesce+
Would you do Nylander for a top 2 dman ?
Setting value arguments to the side, I really don't think the Canes will (nor can they afford to) trade Pesce. He's their only top 4 RHD signed long term.
Faulk is a UFA after next year and I don't see any way he's still with Carolina after that (might even be moved this off-season).
Hamilton is a UFA in 2 more years and while he's fit in well in Carolina, he's been shown to have a bit of a shelf life in other places.
Fox decided not to sign in Carolina.
After that, they have TVR (who also is a UFA after next year) and McKeown (who looks NHL ready, but would be surprised if he was a top 4 RHD any time soon). If the Canes move Pesce for a forward, they would either have to overpay one or both of Faulk/Hamilton to stay or they'd be in the same situation Toronto is in right now....trying to find a top 4 RHD.
If I had to guess, I'd be they try to move Faulk this off-season.
How come you think Faulk won't stay? For the reasons you've outlined it seems like it might be a good idea to retain him.
A hunch.
1) They tried hard to trade him this past off-season, so they clearly wanted to move him. I think they'll try again as they have too much money tied up in defense (and Faulk has the highest salary at $6M even though his cap hit is less. Real $$$ matter more to Carolina).
2) He'll have been with the team 9 years by then and if he has another solid season, it will be his best, and probably only, chance to get a big payday in UFA.
3) I don't think the Canes owner will want to pay him top dollar to stay, particularly with new contracts to Aho, Ferland (or replacement), Svech (in another year), a goalie, etc.
4) Faulk and Hamilton are "ok" at defense, but are good goal scorers. Pesce is the only "defensive" RHD they have.
In 2 years, I think the Canes will have something like:
Slavin-Pesce
CDH - Hamilton
Bean/Fleury/McKeown
Setting value arguments to the side, I really don't think the Canes will (nor can they afford to) trade Pesce. He's their only top 4 RHD signed long term.
Faulk is a UFA after next year and I don't see any way he's still with Carolina after that (might even be moved this off-season).
Hamilton is a UFA in 2 more years and while he's fit in well in Carolina, he's been shown to have a bit of a shelf life in other places.
Fox decided not to sign in Carolina.
After that, they have TVR (who also is a UFA after next year) and McKeown (who looks NHL ready, but would be surprised if he was a top 4 RHD any time soon). If the Canes move Pesce for a forward, they would either have to overpay one or both of Faulk/Hamilton to stay or they'd be in the same situation Toronto is in right now....trying to find a top 4 RHD.
If I had to guess, I'd be they try to move Faulk this off-season.
I think the playoff results will determine if the Canes really make a push for another high end forward. If they score well but get out-goal tended that is not going to fuel the need to add a better forward with Nino, Svech and TT playing as well as they are. Right now I am not looking at Carolina as the most likely trading partner.
right side, yup in a New York minute, I'd also be happy to get Pesce + for him, Pesce would instantly become the best RHD on the Leafs, signed to a sweet contract with good term, leaving plenty on the table to resign Kappy and Johnsson, might even be able to resign Gard's if he's willing to take a team friendly deal. Instantly solves lots of problem while drastically improving team depth.Would you do Nylander for a top 2 dman ?
Pretty much every UFAs they signed the last few years were over paid.
Gagner, Del Zotto, Beagle, Erickasson, Rousell.... the only one that really didn’t overpaid was Vanek.
Rumor: Connor McDavid demands trade out of Edmonton
Probably all smoke and mirrors looking for clicks. Would be a massive story across all media outlets if it was true.
Too bad we couldnt get enough cap space cause watching Panarin tonight in a meaningful game he was lights out and a difference maker.
Imagune dealimg Nylander and zeitzev in a package not taking any money on. Then signing panarin. M
Panarin and Matthews then Tavres and Marner oh boy lol
I really don't think there is that huge of a gap in Matthews and McDavid.
No team would offer a player better then Matthews in a deal. No team.
Why would we add to Matthew's for this trade???
I'm all for adding first but I dont see why we would
Same scenario with us - Marleau & Zaitsev. Then there's our ELC signings which I'm glad we don't have to get into.
Looks like JB likes to give out $3m contracts. That's weird. Eriksson contract looks bad of course but was signed back in 2106 following a 63 point season. Lou hit 73 point & Qty 2 71 point seasons in years previous to that. But that's a bad contract for sure now. Is it they have to overpay, or their manager paying too much? They still have to dump some bad salaries for sure, but I see that as a GM issue.