Branch Rickey wasn't working under a salary cap, and that makes all the difference - the same reasons you would want to move them on are the same reasons you couldn't find a trade partner, and you can't deny them big wages when they have performed well for you up to age 26, etc. - it's a utopian idea that wouldn't function in the real world of the salary cap. I agree with you in the broad sense that we want to avoid cap hell and promote youth continually, for sure, but there are situations where it won't be possible and we just have to manage those. We had a choice to sign Jake to this contract or move him on, because he wouldn't have accepted a super team friendly deal - when he signed it, there is no way it was a good move to trade him away - we were stuck, "victims" of his success. That's pretty much exactly the situation I am talking about.