Jtown
Registered User
Braun >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Farmer or Haag
Braun >>>>>>> Unknown Morin
Nisky >> Gudas
hagg farmer >>>>>>>>>>>morin.
morin f***ing sucks.
Braun >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Farmer or Haag
Braun >>>>>>> Unknown Morin
Nisky >> Gudas
And I'm not flipping about it, in fact, out of people who dislike the move, I think I've been one of the most tame.Kind of, but its not a fool proof way to manage. Hexy wouldnt waiver, and you have to be able to do both.
So far we are out a 2nd a 3rd plus whatever comes back from next move, not a ton to flip about.
Fletcher isn’t necessarily bad but he’s rather mediocre. More concerning is Scott & Homer prodding him to do ****. He’s held them from doing something catastrophically dumb so far like those two would probably have no issue doing.
He’s helped two teams so far that are/were desperate for capspace rather than taking advantage of them. The two guys he brought in are older guys coming terrible seasons. So he’s gambling these guys aren’t declining which isn’t out of the question. He traded a draft pick for signing rights (a fifth rounder isn’t a whole lot but I just hate it on principle regardless of what the pick is). We’ll what he does with the Hayes contract. At least gambling on a 27 year old coming off a good year is better in theory.
I don’t like the moves. They’re not going to kill us but I just don’t really see them moving the needle either. Hopefully there’s some balance & this isn’t basically having Homer back going forward.
LMAO the Sharks would have given away Braun for free if Fletcher waited two weeks. And you guys act like he's going to do something.
except he is.Braun is barely an upgrade on Hagg.
And I'm not flipping about it, in fact out of people who dislike the move I think I've been one of the most tame.
I don't like it and I don't think it's a good way to add to the team. I'd have be fine with trading those picks for someone to help the defense, but I don't like that they targeted a cap dump who is aging, clearly declining, and is typically only useful in the defensive zone. That's the kind of thing we should be (and were when Hextall was here) moving away from. Whatever you disagreed with Hextall about, that shouldn't have been one of the things.
And I'm not flipping about it, in fact out of people who dislike the move I think I've been one of the most tame.
I don't like it and I don't think it's a good way to add to the team. I'd have be fine with trading those picks for someone to help the defense, but I don't like that they targeted a cap dump who is aging, clearly declining, and is typically only useful in the defensive zone. That's the kind of thing we should be (and were when Hextall was here) moving away from. Whatever you disagreed with Hextall about, that shouldn't have been one of the things.
Gudas has never played the type of minutes either Niskanen or Braun consistently have for years, let alone in conference & Cup finals.
except he is.
Go read the main boards and Sharks fans who explain CONTEXT to numbers.
Gudas has never played the type of minutes either Niskanen or Braun consistently have for years, let alone in conference & Cup finals.
He was literally a cap dump... the sharks traded him to get rid of his cap hit.He is not a cap dump, when you pay 25 mill for your top 3 D men, 75% of the D in the league would be a cap dump by that definition
We saw what playoff Gudas looks like and I didn't like it.Gudas has never played the type of minutes either Niskanen or Braun consistently have for years, let alone in conference & Cup finals.
Check back on this deal when Stralman/Edler sign for 2 years $4.5M AAV.
I think cap casualty is the better word. They didn't dump him just to get rid of him. They would've kept him if they could.He was literally a cap dump... the sharks traded him to get rid of his cap hit.
So you want to commit to multiple years opposed to stop gaps ? Not me, I want the keys handed over to the top 4 sooner than later
We saw what playoff Gudas looks like and I didn't like it.
I think cap casualty is the better word. They didn't dump him just to get rid of him. They would've kept him if they could.
If Braun has value as a one-year rental, Stralman and Edler do too. And they're not complete zeroes on offense either.
This package would be a reasonable payment for a Spurgeon rental.
Like we would have with MacDonald.I think cap casualty is the better word. They didn't dump him just to get rid of him. They would've kept him if they could.
there were like 3 players that were good for the Flyers in that series. Pretty damn small sample size. To Gudas' credit, he came back last year and had a damn good year.We saw what playoff Gudas looks like and I didn't like it.