I am not concerned about the money, it is the term
Contractual hardball with Charlie McAvoy is not in the...
Contractual hardball with Charlie McAvoy is not in the...
I am not concerned about the money, it is the term
Just to clarify, are you saying they've already come to a general understanding on the money, or is it just that the ask isn't crazy?
6 years 48 million.
Why? He's still a young ladIf it goes to 8 million a year, then it has to be 8 years.
Because that's a high AAV. In six years, he's looking for a raise. High number should buy you more time.Why? He's still a young lad
To much.He shows bigtime potential but been hurt alot as well.Both sides have to give a bit here .I say 6.75 per ×5 is fair .Then next deal pay him his worth based on a real window.6 years 48 million.
You want to pay him 8 million based on what ?L O L
Dude.
I guess we should have bailed on Bergeron after that Jones hit.You want to pay him 8 million based on what ?
I guess we should have bailed on Bergeron after that Jones hit.
I guess we should have bailed on Bergeron after that Jones hit.
You're the one who's second guessing his value after some freak injuries.What the hell does that have to do with paying Charlie McAvoy 8 million per year ?
Bruins will get him at a good number holding all the cards in RFA status
He turned it down before the injuries. He doesn’t hold the cards as much as people here think. He’s only recently started to play good hockey. This year has been an underwhelming year. In fact, they should have benched him in the beginning. Count on a bridge deal.Has to be a long term deal, we'll get burned if its a bridge
Makes me nervous that they've turned down a long term deal already
Some people say cucumbers taste better pickled.
He turned it down before the injuries. He doesn’t hold the cards as much as people here think. He’s only recently started to play good hockey. This year has been an underwhelming year. In fact, they should have benched him in the beginning. Count on a bridge deal.
People need to stop labeling this kid as the next one and just label him for what he’s done. They aren’t going to pay him because of the hope of the fans.
Carlo and Chara say hiNo but they are going to pay him because he has been a top pairing defenseman since his first second of playoff action against Ottawa during that time he's a +38, has produced 0.5+ PPG with virtually no powerplay time and played the most time of ice of any bruin player of the past two seasons both of which the team has finished in the top 4 in the league.
There's is no "hoping" for me, McAvoy is what he is and he's only going to get better.
What I'm not worried about is DS locking him up, he has shown to get great value of his RFA contracts, thought I still expect McAvoy to come in near the Pastrnak number.
Carlo and Chara say hi
Krug , Carlo, and Chara have played more minutes in the past 2 season than McAvoy.They don't play more than McAvoy, so what are you trying to say?
Krug , Carlo, and Chara have played more minutes in the past 2 season than McAvoy.