Weekes: Flames, Devils, Kings, Bruins all in on goalie discussions, including potential 3 way deals

[BenningHurtsMySoul]

 

[YP44]

Apparently Bruins had a Ullmark trade done but he invoked his NTC rights.

interesting. wonder who to and for what

Loading…

i.postimg.cc

Loading…

i.postimg.cc

Loading…

i.postimg.cc

Wrong thread?

 

[super6646]

Loading…

i.postimg.cc

Loading…

i.postimg.cc

Loading…

i.postimg.cc

I'm not clicking on random linked screenshots. What do they say?

Edit: LOL nvm hahahaha

 

[bruins4thecup65]

Ullmark deal fell apart

 

[Some Other Flame]

Ullmark refusing to go to Edmonton makes perfect sense

 

[bruins4thecup65]

Ullmark rejected trade

Must have been LA

Ullmark refusing to go to Edmonton makes perfect sense

NTC to all CAD teams

 

[Forge]

I would assume it was LA or CO.

 

[viper0220]

TSN is saying Allen simply gets the Kids out of the lineup because they clearly aren't ready. Also that Allen can back up Markstrom, which would make Vanecek obviously part of any return to Calgary

This ship has sailed.

 

[Rubi]

So obviously NJ won't be trading for Markstrom now they have Jake Allen in their goalie stable. Does this mean the 3 way deal is off?

 

[PB37]

interesting. wonder who to and for what


Wrong thread?

Seravalla said it was the Kings. Pieces unknown.

 

[Senor Catface]

Ullmark refusing to go to Edmonton makes perfect sense

Swing and a miss little bro.

 

[YP44]

damn would have loved Ullmark in LA. Especially if the main piece going the other way was PLD.