Striiker
Earthquake Survivor
Top six has been great???
In what alternative facts universe?
Who said that?
Top six has been great???
In what alternative facts universe?
yeah I do the top six is great.Hatcher....who doesnt understand sarcasm lol
The answer is 100% YES
I don't think the gap is that large. All three have much longer track records, but their Cup wins were from no-doubt Cup contenders.
mediocrity is the baseline for successful in his eyes. it's the only explanation for his constant defense of failure.You would find a way to defend the PP after an 0-6 performance. Even a 1-5 performance gets us 2 points last night instead of 1.
The PK hovered around 20th for the first 2/3 of the season, when the games actually mattered and we had realistic playoff hopes.
But i'm sure you'll find a way to spin that as something positive for Hakstol and Co..
yeah I do the top six is great.
It was a joke. This core is terrible and worse to watch. Vinny would be a treat at 4mil.
You didn't watch him at all I guess.
Top 6 has been garbage for years at 5v5 including this year.
The gap is as large as the Grand Canyon.
Just last year they had:
Giroux, Couturier, Simmonds and Schenn all top 100 amongst regular NHL forwards in 5v5 P/60.
Voracek was top 120. Raffl top 140.
They had 4 forwards scoring at 1st line level an 2 second line level.
The problem was they also had 4 forwards in the bottom 15 amongst NHL fwds in 5v5 P/60! And those were the guys playing the easiest minutes on the team.
It really can't be emphasized enough how well our top 6 did to drag the bottom six around. Not only were they tasked with scoring, they were the best defensive units as well, AND facing the hardest competition.
What I love about fans is how expectations and reality diverge.
If I told you before the seasons the goalies would collapse and have a .900% SA, how many points would you expect them to garner?
Note that they just got 5 of 6 points the last three games when Mason started playing like last season - amazing how different a team looks when goalies go from putrid to above average!
But it's all the coach's fault. He chooses the goalies.
What I love about fans is how expectations and reality diverge.
If I told you before the seasons the goalies would collapse and have a .900% SA, how many points would you expect them to garner?
Note that they just got 5 of 6 points the last three games when Mason started playing like last season - amazing how different a team looks when goalies go from putrid to above average!
But it's all the coach's fault. He chooses the goalies.
The team is not underperforming, they're performing about as well as you'd expect given the goaltending.
Last year, they had top ten goaltending and slipped into the playoffs, this year the goaltending is bottom five and they're in the middle of the pack.
Therefore, the coach isn't underperforming.
It's that simple.
What can I say?
I'm a strong believer in evidence based policy.