This is the longest “worked on” trade in a while.”
Faulk is better than vatanen by a pretty decent margin. We got rid of vatanen to get a center because we were weak down the middle.
Im not saying bm has made the best moves last couple years... and faulk will increase our offense.... anywho done respondin to you, because its a waste of time
Different type of player, better defensively, but I wouldn't say Vatanen is better overall.Faulk is not nearly as good as Vatanen, I assure you.
Yah the old bum who can’t carry a team anymore? He’s deadweight. One of the kids better step up or Ducks are swimming in circles this season literally.....
Faulk is absolutely better than vats.Faulk is not nearly as good as Vatanen, I assure you.
so this is not happening?
Faulk is not nearly as good as Vatanen, I assure you.
When other teams heard Faulk and Kase were available, GMs probably started throwing other offers for them which is now messing up this supposed deal.
I suspect it still goes down, but we may see more pieces move than just a 1-for-1.
It doesn't seem that it is the trade value that is holding things up...rather, it is Faulk's desire to come to Anaheim and/or whether the two sides (Faulk/Anaheim) can come to a contract extension agreement.
perhaps, but we've also heard many stories where a GM makes a move and doesn't tell his buddies and everyone is saying, wtf I could have made a better offer for that guy but didn't know about it
Faulk is not nearly as good as Vatanen, I assure you.
Is there another team out there that has the need for a Top 4 RHD, the cap space to acquire him without sending undesirable money back and the competitive motivation to offer a good return? Anaheim stands out in that way.
On the flip side, is there another Top 4 RHD available that fits Anaheim's needs? Ristolainen's name is out there, but the fit is perhaps more questionable and the acquisition cost may be more.
It could be this trade or bust for both sides.
When other teams heard Faulk and Kase were available, GMs probably started throwing other offers for them which is now messing up this supposed deal.
I suspect it still goes down, but we may see more pieces move than just a 1-for-1.
Thinking the same. And that’s what’s scary for Anaheim. Murray may overpay for Faulk, when all it does on the team is a small upgrade on defense with what they already have.
Curious what other pieces may be moved from Canes perspective as well. Does Anaheim take on a bad contract to make it happen? Things are looking complicated now with more moving pieces.
Huh? I have been low on Faulk and high on Vatanen for years...Ah yes, the "traded player's tarring by the old team"...an age old tradition.
all it does on the team is a small upgrade on defense with what they already have.
Colorado
Is it worth paying a good price for Faulk when they have Johnson, who is on ice at camp after his shoulder surgery, and Makar? Sakic is a very patient GM, too.
Yeah, that's fair for sure. I think it depends on what they think their year will look like. Johnson's health is a question mark and Makar, while super talented is very young. They traded Barrie bc he had one year left and was going to cash in big in the off season. They were able to parlay him into a valuable asset in Kadri. They could get Faulk to re-coup some of the D that they lost but at a much lower price and don't have to commit to him if they don't want or could trade him at the deadline if they have a down year. Not saying they will do it, because of the reasons you mentioned but I'd say there's a fit there.