Since it’s apparently necessary for me to give out remedial lessons in basic statistical inference, here’s lesson #2: context matters and must be taken into account when drawing conclusions from data. For instance, the fact that Point was injured both of the last two postseasons clearly negates any implication that he was a choker based on the numbers alone.
And nothing I said was disingenuous - to the contrary, I called out the disingenuousness in someone else, showed how his argument was flawed and reliant on cherry-picked statistics, and disproved his thesis using more recent and therefore appropriate numbers. Do you have anything intelligent to contribute to the discussion, or is unnecessary snark the limit of your capability as well?
It is funny though that you think someone like you matters enough to get me bent out of shape, or indeed to have any impact on my life whatsoever beyond wasting my time reading your nonsense. Fortunately that is easily remedied.