Fantasy Draft Finals Voting

[Llamamoto]

Jake Guentzel - Nathan MacKinnon - Cole Caufield
Robby Fabbri - Christian Dvorak - Andrew Mangiapane
Paul Byron - Jesperi Kotkaniemi - JT Compher
Danton Heinen - Travis Zajac - Keegan Colesar
​

Ryan Graves - Jared Spurgeon
Mattias Ekholm - Dylan DeMelo
Victor Mete - Troy Stecher​

​

Carey Price​

Laurent Brossoit

vs



Alex Killorn (4.45m) - Sean Couturier (4.33m) - Dominik Kubalik (3.70m)
Alex Newhook (910k) - David Krejci (7.25m) - Craig Smith (3.10m)
Brandon Tanev (3.50m) - Ryan Getzlaf (8.25m) - Corey Perry (750k)
Ross Colton (700k) - Tyler Johnson (5.00m) - Garnet Hathaway (1.50m)

Adam Pelech (1.60m) - Charlie McAvoy (4.9m)
Brayden McNabb (2.50m) - Jeff Petry (5.50m)
Nick Holden (1.70m) - Radko Gudas (2.50m)

Semyon Varlamov (5.00m)
Matiss Kivlenieks (730k)

​

Click to read more...

 

[Nucker101]

LA wins, congrats to OB5

John’s no MacK/McD draft idea is something I’d be down to try, either that or an auction but we’d probably need 2-3 people to help run that.

 

[Joey Moss]

Pretty brutal a team with Graves on D1 wins this

 

[OB5]

Pretty! a team with Graves on D1 wins this

FTFY

 

[McMozesmadness]

I still think my team wins this matchup

Hard match Couturier/Pelech/McAvoy vs Mackinnon. At least negate him. I win the rest of the matchups. Price is a playoff stud. He could stand on his head. I think the Kings are small and unproven, weak depth. Defence isn't anything special Graves - Spurgeon as a top pair is exploitable. My team is deep, full of vetaran leadership and built for the playoffs.

"Defence wins championships"
- Me

Serious though. If I die here... it was a valiant effort for pick 23. Thanks to everyone involved. Llama and North for hosting. I love doing these! This group is so fast and involved. Makes it so fun.

As for my lack of scoring. Hard to defend. I think I'd win a lot of 2-1 games. I don't think my team has holes. All lines can defend, defence and forward. I think my scoring is passable. You goobers kept letting elite D slip to me. The idea was gonna be Coots - McAvoy as the base then build from there. Petry slipped. He's a high end #1 in my books. Couldn't pass him up. Pelech in round 5. I take him over some D that were going round 2. Had to take him.

 

[McMozesmadness]

LA wins, congrats to OB5

John’s no MacK/McD draft idea is something I’d be down to try, either that or an auction but we’d probably need 2-3 people to help run that.

Pretty brutal a team with Graves on D1 wins this

Easy bois. Plenty of votes to count. And Joey... if you don't like Graves on pair one, vote Hawks!

 

[Ainec]

Im voting Chicago because it means my team with Panarin Pacioretty Theodore Fox Pelech would have won. And mangiapane on 3rd line.

Most similar team to mine

 

[OB5]

LA wins, congrats to OB5

John’s no MacK/McD draft idea is something I’d be down to try, either that or an auction but we’d probably need 2-3 people to help run that.

Not over yet!

 

[OB5]

I still think my team wins this matchup

Hard match Couturier/Pelech/McAvoy vs Mackinnon. At least negate him. I win the rest of the matchups. Price is a playoff stud. He could stand on his head. I think the Kings are small and unproven, weak depth. Defence isn't anything special Graves - Spurgeon as a top pair is exploitable. My team is deep, full of vetaran leadership and built for the playoffs.

"Defence wins championships"
- Me

Serious though. If I die here... it was a valiant effort for pick 23. Thanks to everyone involved. Llama and North for hosting. I love doing these! This group is so fast and involved. Makes it so fun.

As for my lack of scoring. Hard to defend. I think I'd win a lot of 2-1 games. I don't think my team has holes. All lines can defend, defence and forward. I think my scoring is passable. You goobers kept letting elite D slip to me. The idea was gonna be Coots - McAvoy as the base then build from there. Petry slipped. He's a high end #1 in my books. Couldn't pass him up. Pelech in round 5. I take him over some D that were going round 2. Had to take him.

Disagree

 

[Joey Moss]

Easy bois. Plenty of votes to count. And Joey... if you don't like Graves on pair one, vote Hawks!

I just can’t vote for a team who’s leading scorer would have like 60 points.

 

[Nucker101]

Not over yet!

sorry for the jinx, didn't see this coming....I feel like there's some contrarian mentality in play here lol

 

[OB5]

sorry for the jinx, didn't see this coming....I feel like there's some contrarian mentality in play here lol

I think my team is the better team and need more people to think the same way

 

[Panda Bear]

lol @ @Paralyzer008, @Ainec, @LT and @Carl182

 

[Panda Bear]

"I think the Kings are small and unproven, weak depth" = I don't have a real argument to make, but I can at least mislead myself and other people into thinking it means something

 

[Panda Bear]

Pretty brutal a team with Graves on D1 wins this

> not understanding how defensive pairs work
> not knowing that LA can still play Ekholm-Spurgeon at critical moments in a game

 

[Nucker101]

I like the CHI team, but if that team wins this matchup, this will be one of those results someone we’ll look back on be like “wtf?!”

Contrarian votes against the MacK team

 

[Ainec]

my team that I was drafting in real time so not hindsight. Look at jamie drysdale go. Have hockeynorth's pick #16

Kirill Kaprizov - Jack Eichel - Bryan Rust
Claude Giroux - Paul Stastny - Cole Caufield
Brandon Tanev - Ross Colton - Oliver Wahlstrom
Paul Byron - Nic Dowd - Michael Rasmussen

Adam Pelech - Jamie Drysdale
Ryan McDonagh - Nick Jensen
Gustav Forsling - Alexandre Carrier

Thatcher Demko
Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen

1 eichel (+1)
2 kaprizov (+8)
3 giroux (+4)
4 pelech (+32)
5 rust (+18)
6 mcdonagh (+19)
7 demko (+2)
8 stastny (+17)
9 drysdale (+172)
10 forsling (+25)
11 caufield (+8)
12 tanev (+15)
13 wahlstrom (+13)
14 jensen (+16)
15. r.colton (+47)
16. a.carrier (+1)
17. byron (+8)
18. rasmussen (+2)
19.Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen (undrafted)
20. dowd (+3)

 

[Joey Moss]

> not understanding how defensive pairs work
> not knowing that LA can still play Ekholm-Spurgeon at critical moments in a game

Which would leave the other pairs with nothing. Not to mention who actually thinks that way in these games people put so much stock into how the lines are set up.

 

[Panda Bear]

Which would leave the other pairs with nothing. Not to mention who actually thinks that way in these games people put so much stock into how the lines are set up.

nothing means nothing when the period's over

and I think that way because I'm next level when I vote

 

[m0pe]

my team that I was drafting in real time so not hindsight. Look at jamie drysdale go. Have hockeynorth's pick #16

Kirill Kaprizov - Jack Eichel - Bryan Rust
Claude Giroux - Paul Stastny - Cole Caufield
Brandon Tanev - Ross Colton - Oliver Wahlstrom
Paul Byron - Nic Dowd - Michael Rasmussen

Adam Pelech - Jamie Drysdale
Ryan McDonagh - Nick Jensen
Gustav Forsling - Alexandre Carrier

Thatcher Demko
Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen

1 eichel (+1)
2 kaprizov (+8)
3 giroux (+4)
4 pelech (+32)
5 rust (+18)
6 mcdonagh (+19)
7 demko (+2)
8 stastny (+17)
9 drysdale (+172)
10 forsling (+25)
11 caufield (+8)
12 tanev (+15)
13 wahlstrom (+13)
14 jensen (+16)
15. r.colton (+47)
16. a.carrier (+1)
17. byron (+8)
18. rasmussen (+2)
19.Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen (undrafted)
20. dowd (+3)

poor pelech

 

[Ainec]

Kirill Kaprizov - Jack Eichel - Bryan Rust
Claude Giroux - Paul Stastny - Cole Caufield
Brandon Tanev - Ross Colton - Oliver Wahlstrom
Paul Byron - Nic Dowd - Michael Rasmussen

Adam Pelech - Jamie Drysdale
Ryan McDonagh - Nick Jensen
Gustav Forsling - Alexandre Carrier

Thatcher Demko
Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen


@Llamamoto add this team to the OP pls ser. People can change vote to team C

 

[Ainec]

poor pelech

i better not see drysdale's stock go from rd 14 to rd 9 (my pick), in the next one

 

[McMozesmadness]

"I think the Kings are small and unproven, weak depth" = I don't have a real argument to make, but I can at least mislead myself and other people into thinking it means something

We’re in agreement. Depth, size and leadership don’t matter

 

[Panda Bear]

i better not see drysdale's stock go from rd 14 to rd 9 (my pick), in the next one

I hope he does because Drysdale got absolutely murdered on the ice this season at evens, and him going in round 9 would be a major mistake.

If his stock does go up, it's for a 21-22 game where people bank on his progression.

 

[Panda Bear]

We’re in agreement. Depth, size and leadership don’t matter