KHL reporter claiming Dandanov is going to Vegas
Does anyone still really think Radulov is going there?
KHL reporter claiming Dandanov is going to Vegas
You say this...
Yet you argue that he can have a bounce back season
under WHAT circumstances?
Stop dancing around my question, either admit you have no idea or answer it
I'm going to give you a shot at explaining your stance here...
If you're saying "who cares" how many minutes he played because all of those minutes were 'tough' minutes in defensive situations.
Are you suggesting that the Habs should remove those difficult assignments and instead, give him easy minutes in order for him to have a bounce back year?
In other words, are you arguing to have Tomas Plekanec as a top 6C on this team next year>?
So how will this change in order for him to be able to bounce back? Should he start 75% of his shifts int he offensive zone?
So explain what your alternative is as it relates to Plekanec? How can the Habs best position him in order for him to have a 'bounce back season'?
If I understand correctly, and please, correct me if I'm wrong...
You want the Habs to change Plekanec's role from a tough minute-eating center to a #1 or #2C who gets easy matchups and offensive zone starts?
For the weekend? Or the whole week?
Aivis Kalniņš @A_Kalnins
Appears Vegas Golden Knights and Evgeni Dadonov have resumed contract talks and he is likely to end up playing in Vegas next season.
What are we even arguing here? Bounce back on the Habs or bounce back in Vegas?
Because the way he was used on the Habs this season, in the role of a shutdown center with defensive assignments ~30 points is nothing to sneeze at!
If Vegas doesn't pick him he will be our third line center and his role will remain the same, tough minutes, defensive zone starts, PK galore!
Why are you talking about a bounce back?
Considering how he was used he didn't have an abysmal season!
The only reason people crap on him it's because he's making 6M per year. Give me Plekanec at 3M per year on my third line any day of the week
Oh in Vegas you're talking about?
Sure, he could bounce back there...they can give him the icetime he NEEDS to produce points. He can go over there and center their 2nd line, get some PP time, etc and maybe bounce back with 35-40pts and be a decent asset at the deadline for VGK.
But the Habs can't afford to give him that same kind of role...so he's not going to bounce back WITH the Habs.
It's something to cry about, be ashamed about...sure
We can get all of this from Danault at a fraction of the cost
Huh? YOU brought up him having a bounce back season lol
Abysmal would be putting it lightly
He doesn't make 3M per year, he makes 6M...so this is irrelevant
I think Vegas picks him up and uses him in an offensive role to pump up his value and then trades him at the TDL by retaining his full salary. Anyways this is what I would do if I would be McPhee.
You're saying Danault can do all that for a fraction of the price, while I agree I don't think Danault is as good defensively yet but definitely could get there with more games.
I hope we get one! But two? I mean, it's wishful thinking IMO.The problem with this scenario is that you apparently got 2 top 6 centers somehow....
Chris Nichols @NicholsOnHockey 35m35 minutes ago
LeBrun: "Unless our information is completely wrong, Marc-Andre Fleury is the pick for Vegas - which means all those other guys are safe."
Are they going to announce any trades involving Vegas during the award show as well?
Are they going to announce any trades involving Vegas during the award show as well?
Well they are revealing the Vegas roster so they wouldn't really have much choice.
For the weekend? Or the whole week?
I was talking about 5yrs ago
Plek is the guy that everyone said he was done 5 years ago and when he's finally on the decline, everyone can say 'see? Told you he was done'.
He would be a good choice for vegas if they want to compete now
At 6 million for ~30 points, no. Still really not convinced at all. Vegas can get better centers for cheaper and they are going to have problems fitting their picks under the cap as opposed to have problems reaching the floor. Vegas selecting Plekanec is wishful thinking at best.
I don't get your point then. If he's a good center that's worth a lot, why trade him unless the plan is a tank/full rebuild? He's a 30 yr old 5 years ago, 2 years younger than Weber is now.
The concept of trading for a top 6 C has yet to happen even though we've known it to be an issue for years. If we trade Plekanec, it would have only made sense coupled with a rebuild because the likelihood of Habs having a replacement is fantasy.
Plek is the guy that everyone said he was done 5 years ago and when he's finally on the decline, everyone can say 'see? Told you he was done'.
He would be a good choice for vegas if they want to compete now
TSN projected the other day that with an expensive defense they will draft and goaltending they will just reach above the cap floor and that's drafting decent forwards and that's including brock nelson.
They will have room to take on contracts no problem.
To say taking Plekanec is wishful thinking is wrong. The rumored deal has Vegas taking on Kulemin + Grabovski for a 1st. Now the Habs woldnt need to offer a first as both of those players are much more done than Plekanec. Grabovski isn't even playing. So don't downplay Plekanec being not value able to Vegas.
At 6 million for ~30 points, no. Still really not convinced at all. Vegas can get better centers for cheaper and they are going to have problems fitting their picks under the cap as opposed to have problems reaching the floor. Vegas selecting Plekanec is wishful thinking at best.
Kulemin much more done than Plekanex?
Perhaps so...but Kulemin scored more goals than Plekanex and he 5 less points in 6 less games but with MUCH less icetime than our resident Selke candidate.
If you think Kulemin is done...Plekanex isn't too far behind
Kulemin has 1 30 point season in the last 6 years where Plekanec has 1 season under 30 points...
Plekanecs career is coming to a close, he will be 35 in October. Only this passed season can you even compare the two, but they have 4 years difference.
I never argued he was done 5yrs ago...that's just something some people have decided to make up because I've ended up being 100% right when it comes to Plekanex.
What I argued THEN was that his value would never be higher than what it was THEN and given the Habs were a team that had just finished 3rd last overall, it was the perfect opportunity to reshape your roster.
The assets we would of gotten for Plekanex THEN could of been used to build the team today.
Look at what a guy like Antoine Vermette got traded for a few years ago...1st round pick and a prospect.
Plekanex was better...see what the Yotes for Hanzal at the deadline this year?
The Habs could of positioned themselves similarly...instead we've got a washed up Plekanex making top 6 money for bottom 6 production.
Furthermore, we can't bring in another top center without moving his contract... not to mention the 5yrs of development wasted for a guy like Galchenyuk.
Again...I often go back and read those old Plekanex threads, some real gems