Bad Goalie
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2014
- 20,099
- 8,827
Nucks have Vegas, Anaheim then this Avs team again.
Ducks have won 6 in a row.
Nucks have Vegas, Anaheim then this Avs team again.
Napoleon Bonaparte was essentially technically Italian.In a comparison to WW2, I would say as a combatant entity the Canucks feel like Italy. Good soldiers, bad equipment and terrible leaders. Also very weak as a whole, naturally. With terrible leadership you will always lose in the end.
No Hamonic, Schenn or Poolman (likely to be suspended) for next game against Vegas..Madison Bowey recalled from Abby.
i remember the backlash MS got when he said “this is probably going to be our beat chance for a while” when we made it to the second round in the bubble
none of us expected us to be this bad this year tho
hfboards too positive?
We could definitely see another blowout loss.Golden Knights -1.5 is looks like literal free money tomorrow.
terrible garbage owner. need a new owner.
For all the criticism of the Lotto Line ... their numbers are pretty much on par.
If we were to have received 75 (Pettersson) + 70 (Miller) + 70 (Miller) = 215 points from that group, I think that would have been considered pretty decent heading into the season.
Right now, they're on pace for 93 (Miller) + 60 (Boeser) + 53 (Pettersson) = 206 points.
Meanwhile our #3 and #4 centers have put a 27-1-0-1 line on the board while playing 23 minutes/night.
Having two of your regular centers fail to record an assist this far into the season should be nearly impossible. And one of them isn't even Sutter.
That's a good analogy! I like your creativity in that. Yeah, the Canucks are either Italy or France. Neither feels that great. Both got crushed when they had to perform because of basically the same reasons. Incompetent doctrine and a leadership always taking care of their past failures.Italy at least beat the basement dwelling militaries of Ethiopia and Albania.
I'd say we are France.
We got scarred by the last war (2011) and it has left its mark on us as an organization and culture.
We have incompetent leadership comprised of ineffective old men that is trying it's hardest to win the last war, and investing in tactics and assets to win of the last war (Maginot line and 'Culture carrying vets')
Leadership doesn't lead from the frontlines, but in a bunker hundreds of miles in the rear without any telephone/telegraph system set up. (No accountability/media appearances from JB/Aqua, Gamelin in the battle of France)
Relying on outdated technology, mindset and tactics rather than keep up with the times, because their mindset is still in the first world war (defense vs offense, investment in infantry vs aircraft/tanks, throwing draft picks away for older 'established' vets, focusing on size and players who 'make a good first pass')
Strategy is to turtle and defend rather than attack, even with overwhelming odds in your favor, because they psychologically are already beaten by past experiences and ghosts (see. Buffalo game, France during the Invasion of Poland)
Golden Knights -1.5 is looking like literal free money tomorrow.
This sums up the Canucks offence well. People get excited and wonder why they are struggling offensively because they have a very good top six. However, the supporting cast is awful. In 2011, the Nucks third line could defend but also score.
Knights have been playing very loose hockey so far this year. It could be the wide open game the Canucks like to play. May simply come down to Lehner vs Demko.
Hamonic has only played a couple of games for the Canucks, and Schenn has been a healthy scratch for most of the season. Poolman has been decent, but at this point is no better than a 5-6 d-man.Canucks will have no Hamonic, no Schenn, and no Poolman, the D will be a mess next game and probably the one after, thought I'd remind the people who are betting
Hamonic has only played a couple of games for the Canucks, and Schenn has been a healthy scratch for most of the season. Poolman has been decent, but at this point is no better than a 5-6 d-man.
If the absence of those guys is going to derail the Canucks blueline then they were pretty terrible to begin with. Come to think of it, that's probably true.
Unfortunately the Canucks don't have the last change in these road games, so that means some of their vulnerable d-pairings get trapped out there with unfavorable matchups.
We could definitely see another blowout loss.
Been a fan since day one but I have to say that this is the most hopeless I’ve felt about the future of the team and that’s saying something after the previous sad states that the team has been in.
It’s going to be a long winter…
No Poolman...
Nucks D might be:
OEL - Myers
Hughes - Bowey
Rathbone - Burroughs
.........
Desperate times call for desperate measures, let the heads roll.whatever happened last year is not over, and looks like it can only be over if heads roll.
You forgot slow Garrison who was our best defender 2013-2014 when he also had like 7 G and 33 pts. People seem to hate him for some reason but he was decent. Trader Jim got a 2nd for him. He replaced him with Sbisa. I heve no doubt that we beat the Flames with slowGarrison instead of Sbisa even with Willie 1,2,3,4 at the helm.That D looks trash.
Remember when Benning inherited this team..
Our top 4 then
Edler-Hamhuis
Tanev- Bieksa
No improvement whatsoever after 8 years
France did have a few good leaders but they were in the minority. They actually had tanks that could stop the German Panzers way back in 1940 (the Germans soon found out just how inferior their tanks were when they attacked the Soviet Union & they had to quickly made the necessary "adjustments"). Problem with France is that their "leadership" spread out their armour throughout their country instead of concentrating them as one armoured force (this is actually what Charles De Gaulle wanted them to do but nobody wanted to listen to him).That's a good analogy! I like your creativity in that. Yeah, the Canucks are either Italy or France. Neither feels that great. Both got crushed when they had to perform because of basically the same reasons. Incompetent doctrine and a leadership always taking care of their past failures.