Erik Karlsson (Part 4)

Status
Not open for further replies.

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
37,993
11,375
Who replaces Dillon and Braun say we resign Karlsson and need to shed space for Pavs? And are they capable NHL players or are we gonna be cursing them out whenever they’re on ice?
Vlasic - Karlsson
Simek - Burns
Ryan - Heed

Seems fine to me. :dunno:

The #7 is a bit of a mystery, but we can find someone adequate for cheap, or someone from within may step up. Hell, I wouldn't be against trying to see if Burns and Ryan can play well together once again to give us 3 very excellent pairings.

Simek - Karlsson
Ryan - Burns
Vlasic - Heed
 

Pavelski2112

Bold as Boognish
Dec 15, 2011
14,572
9,345
San Jose, California
Vlasic - Karlsson
Simek - Burns
Ryan - Heed

Seems fine to me. :dunno:

The #7 is a bit of a mystery, but we can find someone adequate for cheap, or someone from within may step up. Hell, I wouldn't be against trying to see if Burns and Ryan can play well together once again to give us 3 very excellent pairings.

Simek - Karlsson
Ryan - Burns
Vlasic - Heed

Out of all the guys we have in the system, drafted or from Europe/college, and the number of options in FA available, I'm not worried about bottom pairing dmen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CanadianSharks

SjMilhouse

Registered User
Jul 18, 2012
2,217
2,708
Most Sharks fans believe that Tavares never seriously considered signing in San Jose, and only used the Sharks as leverage to get a better deal from Toronto. That is what other users mean by “pulling a Tavares” in the context of this discussion.
^ this. I'm saying if Karlsson openly knows he isn't going to sign in San Jose (when we can offer him 8x$any money) but still decides to negotiate with the team for the sole reason of getting more money elsewhere, then he's pulling a Tavares.

Obviously there is no like concrete proof that Tavares did that but based on comments/interviews/ect that came out later, I thought I remember he more or less was like "yeah I was never going to sign anywhere but Toronto or NYI and used other teams as leverage". That is the shit that pisses me off.

So as long as Karlsson says thanks but no thanks and doesn't f*** up our free agency as a result by negotiating in bad faith, while it would suck, I fully understand and respect his decision to leave

Edit: I say all this knowing full well that it's a legitimate business tactic and fully in Tavares right to do. But I also have the right to call him a POS for stringing the fan base and management along and distracting us from making moves in the offseason that could actually help the team
 

hockfan1991

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
2,075
297
Yea, there was an article saying as much after he signed. Tbf, I don't remember if he said it himself that San Jose was a possible option, or if people just assumed so for whatever reason.

Combination of things.

We were in need of a 1c

Had the money

Successful on and off the ice franchise not ran in the gutter like many

Him and couture are very good friends

There were lots of things that made people think Sharks
 

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,361
25,425
Fremont, CA
Combination of things.

We were in need of a 1c

Had the money

Successful on and off the ice franchise not ran in the gutter like many

Him and couture are very good friends

There were lots of things that made people think Sharks

I think the thing that really made people think Sharks was that he met with Doug Wilson, Peter DeBoer, and Hasso Plattner in Los Angeles and it was all made public.
 

hockfan1991

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
2,075
297
I think the thing that really made people think Sharks was that he met with Doug Wilson, Peter DeBoer, and Hasso Plattner in Los Angeles and it was all made public.

True

Very rare for Plattner to attend games let alone free agent signings, to his credit sales pitch is his game too.
 

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,361
25,425
Fremont, CA
True

Very rare for Plattner to attend games let alone free agent signings, to his credit sales pitch is his game too.

Right, and that whole thing being made public is a big part of why people here hate Tavares the way that they do.

The entire process frankly humiliated the Sharks. They flown their owner down to LA, went all in on Tavares, and offered him over $2M more than Toronto did. Then he signed with Toronto, posted pictures of himself in Maple Leafs bedsheets, and essentially said that he only considered Toronto and New York.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SjMilhouse

Lebanezer

I'unno? Coast Guard?
Jul 24, 2006
14,917
10,735
San Jose
I think the thing that really made people think Sharks was that he met with Doug Wilson, Peter DeBoer, and Hasso Plattner in Los Angeles and it was all made public.
I partially blame the Islanders beat writer Arthur Staple. He kept saying if Tavares leaves the Islanders he’s most likely going to San Jose.
 

jMoneyBrah

Registered User
Jan 10, 2013
1,107
1,535
South Bay
Right, and that whole thing being made public is a big part of why people here hate Tavares the way that they do.

The entire process frankly humiliated the Sharks. They flown their owner down to LA, went all in on Tavares, and offered him over $2M more than Toronto did. Then he signed with Toronto, posted pictures of himself in Maple Leafs bedsheets, and essentially said that he only considered Toronto and New York.

Who’s humiliated? The Sharks took their best swing at a top free agent and struck out. It wasn’t the first time, it won’t be the last time.

So Tavares took less money to play for his actual hometown team, a literal hometown discount, and on top of the Islanders feeling scorned the Sharks are supposed to feel scorned?

The Sharks got an opportunity to make their case, and apparently couldn’t match the entirely human desire to play for one’s childhood team. Even if Tavares had predetermined he was going to Toronto or NY, as a GM/org you’d at least want an opportunity to make a pitch in the off chance you can change a mind. There’s some quote by a famous hockey player about shots not taken and goals not being generated.
 

Fraser28

Registered User
Jan 13, 2013
2,156
2,132
I don't want to sign Karlsson for what he would get paid, and the 8-year term. His injuries are concerning, he has made a perplexing number of bad reads these Playoffs, and I actually don't like at all how he lost his mind at Dillon. Especially since his own play that game was garbage too. Super hypocritical and a bad teammate. Unless he leads us to the Cup and turns around his defensive game, I do not want to sign him.
 

OrrNumber4

Registered User
Jul 25, 2002
15,966
5,229
Considering what he signed for, it is hard to imagine that he only spoke with the Sharks to bid it up.
 

Karl Prime

Registered User
Feb 13, 2017
4,601
4,340
One thing about Erik, he's a tough son of a gun. Doesn't mind getting hit so long as he makes the play. He did say he has felt great since the playoffs started but I'd take that with a grain of salt. He's not going to tell the Blues in an interview that his groin is bothering him and invite them to be even more physical on him, if that's possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NiWa

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,361
25,425
Fremont, CA
One thing about Erik, he's a tough son of a gun. Doesn't mind getting hit so long as he makes the play. He did say he has felt great since the playoffs started but I'd take that with a grain of salt. He's not going to tell the Blues in an interview that his groin is bothering him and invite them to be even more physical on him, if that's possible.

Yeah, I really hate to see people calling him soft. There are a lot of valid criticisms of him, but I don’t think that is one of them.

I thought he played well tonight. He’s still not as dominant as he was around December or January but if he can play like this for the rest of the way, he’s going to have a major positive impact on the rest of the playoffs.
 

Jargon

Registered User
Apr 12, 2011
5,770
9,795
Venice, California
Yeah, I really hate to see people calling him soft. There are a lot of valid criticisms of him, but I don’t think that is one of them.

I thought he played well tonight. He’s still not as dominant as he was around December or January but if he can play like this for the rest of the way, he’s going to have a major positive impact on the rest of the playoffs.

Agreed, he looked good, far better than the last two Avs games. He just has these games periodically where he makes the dumbest plays shift after shift, doesn’t hustle on defense, etc. it’s all likely due to injury... I think? Or at least, not knowing how to play down to his injured self and trying things he’s normally be able to recover from with his skating.
 

ChompChomp

Can't wait for Sharks hockey to return someday
Jan 8, 2007
11,070
1,686
El Paso, TX
People talk about the Sharks team makeup with EK65 cap wise, his injury risk, and all this stuff, but I think people are missing a larger picture:

As these current playoffs are showing, and as we all suspected, having Burns and Erik Karlsson is a huge reason this team could win a Cup this year a la Pronger and Nieds.

The Sharks are going to bring the dump truck for Erik Karlsson. Book it. He may leave, but the Sharks will try everything in their power to keep him. Why? With him and Burns, they could potentially win several Cups or at least be a team annually making the Finals. If that happens, the Sharks popularity and profile will dramatically increase, especially in the Bay Area. TV ratings will rise and when that shitty tv deal expires, the Sharks will finally be able to command a premium.

That's what it all about for the Sharks business side, and if they feel resigning EK65 gives them the best chance for that scenario to play out, you better believe they aren't going to let themselves get outbid. They could lose him because he just wants to go somewhere else, but it won't be a money issue. The potential long term business benefits that could come because Burns, EK65 and Vlasic put them in the legitimate title hunt every season/actually winning Cups is too great to simply pass up because you don't want to slightly overpay Erik Karlsson.
 

Karl Prime

Registered User
Feb 13, 2017
4,601
4,340
So I saw about halfway through the 3rd, there was a play where EK65 got checked to the ice along the end boards, but got the puck to Dillon, who got it to Pavs, and then out of the corner you see Karl come into play as an outlet option for Joe, while the Blues player that hit him trailed behind. Thought that was a pretty interesting cap to what I was saying about how he plays through contact very well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frosty415 and Phu

Star Ocean

Registered User
Dec 30, 2018
3,583
2,003
Cant you folks give karlsson a break during this cup run? Wait until the final game is played.

His focus is currently to win the cup, contract talks now would be foolish.
 
Last edited:

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
37,993
11,375
Cant you folks give karlsson a break during this cup run? Wait until the final game is played.

His focus is currently to win the cup, contract talks now would be foolish.
Err what? We have no impact on the negotiations. We're just speculating what may or may not happen. Don't talk about the contract negotiations in this thread if you don't want to, but it's absolutely a relevant discussion.
 

spintops

Registered User
Sep 13, 2013
1,653
863
I know you don't want your team to think about this aspect too much, but - Do you think there is any hesitation to give EK something like 8x11 or 8x12 with Burns earning so much less? "Message it sends to the room and all that blah blah" that EK can conceivably make 50% more per year when Burns has been so much better in the playoffs / healthier / a shark for so much longer.
 

do0glas

Registered User
Jan 26, 2012
13,271
683
I know you don't want your team to think about this aspect too much, but - Do you think there is any hesitation to give EK something like 8x11 or 8x12 with Burns earning so much less? "Message it sends to the room and all that blah blah" that EK can conceivably make 50% more per year when Burns has been so much better in the playoffs / healthier / a shark for so much longer.

Honestly this is just the nature of the cap. He's younger, getting a contract later. Its gonna be more than burns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phu

LadyStanley

Registered User
Sep 22, 2004
107,169
20,047
Sin City
But EK65 has a history of injury. He has not been as impactful with the Sharks (due to missing almost half the season).

I would NOT give him a 8 year deal. I would not give him an 8-digit contract (IOW less than $10m/year). I don't know that I'd give him more than BB88.
 

spintops

Registered User
Sep 13, 2013
1,653
863
Honestly this is just the nature of the cap. He's younger, getting a contract later. Its gonna be more than burns.
I agree. And I would still sign him - I think he was finally adjusting to the team before the injury, he could still give us some Norris quality years. That said, it's not a small difference in pay just from the cap rising. 64 mil vs 96M if he got 8x12
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad