Re: Keith I don't know, probably. Toews wasn't overrated.. He always had skill and he was clearly the best player on the ice on a stacked team Canada that won gold in 2010 (which you should remember if you were in Vancouver at the time) and followed that up with 29 points in 22 playoff games to lead his team to a Stanley cup as a 21 year old captain. Not sure why his production fell off relatively or why Kane's production exploded at 27 years old. I think it might have to do with psychoactive drugs impacting his reflexes and motor abilities - I remember Toews talking about being really into "expanding his consciousness" on a podcast once. He's no slouch at 42 points in 48 games but his contract is a very hard one to live up to.
Bonino was a Conn Smythe contender. Toews was excellent in 2010 but it is a small sample size. He's certainly no bum, but this guy is rated top 100 of all time and there was talk if he was better than Crosby. Keith-Seabrook was our best pairing in 2010. IIRC Kesler had a great Olympics on the team that took Canada to OT in a hell of a game and also did very well in the playoffs until his injury while having to take defensive duties with Malhotra out. Linden sure had a hell of a playoffs as well but I think we can all agree he isn't in the conversation with top players. Sample size matters.
At the end of the day the cup is a team award and those Chicago teams were insane, it's a lot easier to be a captain on an elite team than a bad team. Also, as I said before, I believe the captaincy is overrated. Suspiciously it's always players like Toews who get a ton of credit for winning based on intangibles and leadership in the room while Ovechkin wearing the C doesn't seem to play into it much. The only "C" that matters is the C for "Core". One leader is not what makes the difference, but a core filled with leaders.
It's not sour grapes and I'm not trying to run down Toews, but being considered better than Crosby as the best player in the league is absurd. Up front Tavares, Stamkos, Ovechkin and Malkin were all ahead of him and you can put guys like Chara in there as well. Keith was a monster for those cup years as well and won a Norris. It's not a matter of Toews being bad while everyone thinks he is good, it's a matter of people putting him ahead of Crosby and top 100 of all time.
Gudbranson is a bad player who is overrated
Sutter is a solid player who is overrated
Toews is an elite player who is overrated.
Sedins were elite players who were underrated (until they suddenly became sweethearts in the final 2 or maybe 3 years of their careers)
Burrows was a very good player who was underrated
Wellwood was a solid player who was underrated
Gaunce is a depth player who is underrated
It's the top and bottom end of those scales where the overrated/underrated is exaggerated the most.
Gudbranson is a player who should be a #7/AHL guy but in reality would 100% get a pretty decent return in a trade
Toews was billed as the best player in the world and considered top 100 ever in the middle of his prime.
Gaunce shouldn't clear waivers and is fine in a specialist role. Nothing special but better than other depth NHL players.
Sedins were treated like garbage by the media and the league, even players talked shit about them until they retired.
The Sedins in their prime were quite honestly better than Toews in their respective primes, but they didn't have the Canadian serious captain image and the CHOKERS only made it to game 7 of the finals rather than winning. Excluding Toews 29p in 22 games year, which admittedly is a pretty f***ing big thing to exclude, the Sedins actually
out performed Toews in points per game. If it weren't for that disaster of a finals with the entire team injured they would have cleared him including the 29p performance, but to be fair if ifs and buts were candy and nuts we'd all have a merry Christmas. Even so, it's close and you know damn well if they won the cup they still wouldn't get any credit for "intangibles", those would go to Kesler, Bieksa and Luongo (not that they didn't deserve it).
Burrows brought far more to the team in the room than Kesler, and this is documented, but he would be dismissed as well to give credit to Ryan "Mr Quiet" "She's lookin good, Schneider" "I want a trade. *tanks value* heh. nothing personnel, Gillis" Kesler.
If Pettersson and Horvat go on to win the cup with Horvat as the captain, you can bet your ass that Horvat will be overrated as well, and to be honest with Horvat's career trajectory so far I think he has the potential to be a Toews tier player. He oozes character, works hard, keeps improving and will take whatever you throw at him. I love me some Horvat and believe him to be underrated right now because we aren't a playoff team, but he will never be better than Crosby or the Sedins.
The Sedins were the most dominant possession players in the game along with Crosby for several seasons. Like Crosby, Henrik and Daniel were clearly 1-3 in a tight race. The most important thing that could put Toews over the top with the Sedins is longevity as the Sedins had a very bizarre career trajectory, but at their peak were better than Toews and top 5, arguably top 3 with Crosby, players in the league which Toews has never been. That peak wasn't like the 50 games or whatever were Bertuzzi was "the best player in hockey", it was for 5 years. It wasn't matchups either, the Sedins played against the best players in the league and performed.
Being a North American captain gives you a +5 buff in the media which moves you up the rankings. There is no shame in Yzerman behind behind Fedorov and Lidstrom, but a lot of people do put Yzerman ahead of Fedorov just like they put Toews ahead of better players. Absolutely elite player and has the hardware to be a 1st ballot hall of famer. Not better than Crosby, not top 100 all time, 3rd best player on his team behind two other elite hall of famers with just as much hardware.