ECQF: (1) Washington Capitals vs. (WC1) Columbus Blue Jackets | Caps Lead Series 3-2

Who ya got?! Caps or CBJ?

  • WSH (sweep)

    Votes: 20 2.7%
  • CBJ (sweep)

    Votes: 6 0.8%
  • WSH (in 5)

    Votes: 96 13.0%
  • CBJ (in 5)

    Votes: 16 2.2%
  • WSH (in 6)

    Votes: 232 31.4%
  • CBJ (in 6)

    Votes: 129 17.5%
  • WSH (in 7)

    Votes: 114 15.4%
  • CBJ (in 7)

    Votes: 125 16.9%

  • Total voters
    738
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

canadianguy77

Registered User
Apr 20, 2006
20,742
10,589
Yeah, I don't understand why the jackets slowed the pace down in the 2nd OT. They do better when they're skating. Maybe their team isn't in shape.
 

illpucks

Registered User
May 26, 2011
20,525
4,973
Man is Chicago ever dumb. Should have traded Kane for an absolute King's ransom instead.

Hawks would be in cup contention if they did.
 

c9777666

Registered User
Aug 31, 2016
19,892
5,875
As much as I want to say this is a potential series changing moment..... winning game 3 in OT down 2-0 doesn’t guarantee a series comeback (Kings/Sharks 2 years ago)
 

hockeyguy272

Registered User
Apr 30, 2015
111
91
What did he say? Turn it into a boxing match?

He said that at some point they should go 4 on 4 and then 3 on 3. Kind of hinted at them dropping to 4 on 4 in 2OT and then 3 on 3 in 3OT.

His argument was that extra 5 on 5 periods make games after it less interesting since it wears players out more. I don't necessarily disagree with that, but I think it's part of the game for teams to want to win in regulation to keep their players fresh.
 

Caps8112

Registered User
Sponsor
Aug 12, 2008
3,388
1,804
As much as I want to say this is a potential series changing moment..... winning game 3 in OT down 2-0 doesn’t guarantee a series comeback (Kings/Sharks 2 years ago)
all that means is it is a coin flip series like a lot of fans from both teams said before it started. could be 3-0 either team
 

MayonnaiseOreo

I Hate the Flyers
Apr 8, 2012
2,933
1,960
A Glass of Milk
As much as I want to say this is a potential series changing moment..... winning game 3 in OT down 2-0 doesn’t guarantee a series comeback (Kings/Sharks 2 years ago)

Yeah, you pretty much already said exactly this on the last page. Nobody is acting like the Caps have the series in the bag now.
 

illpucks

Registered User
May 26, 2011
20,525
4,973
Yeah, I don't understand why the jackets slowed the pace down in the 2nd OT. They do better when they're skating. Maybe their team isn't in shape.
Panarin makes the rest of his team look slow.

They also lost momentum when they didn't score on the PP
 

c9777666

Registered User
Aug 31, 2016
19,892
5,875
Interestingly, for all the history of Caps postseason problems,
They have been swept only thrice in team history- 1990, 1998, 2011.
 

PatriceBergeronFan

Registered User
Jul 15, 2011
59,664
37,278
USA
He said that at some point they should go 4 on 4 and then 3 on 3. Kind of hinted at them dropping to 4 on 4 in 2OT and then 3 on 3 in 3OT.

His argument was that extra 5 on 5 periods make games after it less interesting since it wears players out more. I don't necessarily disagree with that, but I think it's part of the game for teams to want to win in regulation to keep their players fresh.
Do not change OT.
 

CarolinaBlueJacket

Registered User
Mar 3, 2011
3,946
3,360
North Carolina
Pretty good game overall. Both goalies played really well. Too bad it had to end on a garbage goal, but they all count so on to game 4.
Caps winning this game is not unexpected. The Jackets need to win the next game and go back to DC with a 3-1 lead. If it goes back 2-2 then I figure the Caps would take the series because they would have all of the momentum.
 

The Wizard of Oz

Registered User
Feb 24, 2013
807
426
Michigan
What did he say? Turn it into a boxing match?
After the first overtime change it to 4on4 or 3on3 because it turns into a "slog" with tired players. He's right it's not as pretty to watch (unless it's Breadman). But to me nothing epitomizes playoff hockey more than that war of attrition in the late hours of the night. Not to mention all the great game winning moments because of it. 4 periods of 5on5 hockey and then the Stanley Cup to be decided on a 3on3 goal, yeah sounds wonderful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MayonnaiseOreo

Firsov99

Registered User
Feb 17, 2006
4,759
3,480
Milbury talking about changing playoff overtime format... I want to throw up. Don't touch perfection. Yes the quality of play goes down in multiple OTs but the effort doesn't and that's what makes it compelling. Leave the game alone.
I heard that too and chuckled. He was entertaining an idea to play 4 on 4 and even 3 on 3 after a certain number of OTs. And by the fourth OT it would be 2 on 2, and finally, a goalie against a goalie in the fifth. ;-)
 

Benneguin

Original Recipe
May 26, 2015
1,613
477
He said that at some point they should go 4 on 4 and then 3 on 3. Kind of hinted at them dropping to 4 on 4 in 2OT and then 3 on 3 in 3OT.

His argument was that extra 5 on 5 periods make games after it less interesting since it wears players out more. I don't necessarily disagree with that, but I think it's part of the game for teams to want to win in regulation to keep their players fresh.

I hope that doesn’t happen. The last thing we need is for the playoffs to become another regular season where the bar is lowered for teams that can’t compete otherwise. What’s next? Awarding a team a .5 win if they lose in OT?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad