And Pisani outscored all players in the 2006 playoffs, does that mean that every player who didn't score as much as he did is worth less? No. It also doesn't mean that he is as valuable as any player because of that. You can't take what a player does in one post-season and apply that to his value across the board, and assume values of other players based on a comparison between the two in that small sample size. You're trying to logic something that is illogical by arguing with flawed logic. It just doesn't work that way, and I think you know that. You're just trolling.
Based on this, every team should be falling all over each other trying to spend **** tons of money on Williams, because of his track record of playoff performance. It just doesn't work.
Edit: I'm not trying to defend Eberle - he had a ****** ****ing post-season. But your argument is so flawed it needs to be said.