Bruce Granville
Registered User
- Oct 11, 2014
- 5,175
- 3,731
Totally the same as Dumba will never, ever be traded so you'll shut down every thread started by requesting something ridiculous like Matthews + Tavares. It's almost as if team needs can change, management can change, offers that can't be resisted can present themselves, or posters might want to discuss trade value for the sake of it. If they want to do that, they should be able to. And it's not like Haula and Tuch are Gretzky and Lemieux anyway.Wild management and ownership gave up Tuch and Haula to protect Dumba in the expansion draft, then new management and ownership gave him a 5 year contract last night, and every single Wild fan in this thread has said the exact same thing as I am.
I feel pretty comfortable using the term “we” at this point.
Except Boudreau is a CF% system. Here is a chart of Anaheim
"I didn't like what Mach85 had to say so I completely misrepresented his point." See, I can do what you just did too.So Wild fan's input doesn't matter because it's not what you want to hear. Instead, our input is derailing the discussion?
Get the **** outta here lol.
Totally the same as Dumba will never, ever be traded so you'll shut down every thread started by requesting something ridiculous like Matthews + Tavares. It's almost as if team needs can change, management can change, offers that can't be resisted can present themselves, or posters might want to discuss trade value for the sake of it. If they want to do that, they should be able to. And it's not like Haula and Tuch are Gretzky and Lemieux anyway.
He did the same thing in WashBoudreau hasn’t coached in Anaheim in over two years, and while I’ve never coached in the NHL, I think it’s probably fair to say coaching style can change based on the players you’re coaching.
Again with the "we." You're not your team's management. If YOU and other fans don't want to trade him, that's cool you don't have to participate. But derailing things for others who want to discuss the idea is just trolling and disruptive.
Now do Minnesota.Except Boudreau is a CF% system. Here is a chart of Anaheim
View attachment 131159
"I didn't like what Mach85 had to say so I completely misrepresented his point." See, I can do what you just did too.
Alright man, I can respect that. We at least can have a discussion. I wouldn't make the deal if I were the Leafs personally, because Marner is an important player. But I don't know Minny as well as I know the Leafs, and I'm sure you value Dumba as well and may require extra value to trade him.Sure, if you want to discuss trade value for the sake of it, the value we require for Dumba is Marner.
He did the same thing in Wash
"I" haven't been told anything lol. I was a lurker until I got frustrated with how the discussion was being shut down. Re-read the original post I quoted, and my original point, then get back to me. I have no argument when it comes to Minny fans' dissatisfaction with the original proposal. Jeez.You've been told the same thing repeatedly throughout this thread and refuse to take it as truth. The ask from the Leafs would be either Marner or Nylander+. That's it. There's no Hyman+, there's no Gardiner+, there's no Kapanen+, no other Wild fan has expressed any interest in your scraps.
"I" haven't been told anything lol. I was a lurker until I got frustrated with how the discussion was being shut down. Re-read the original post I quoted, and my original point, then get back to me. I have no argument when it comes to Minny fans' dissatisfaction with the original proposal. Jeez.
Fellas, I'm not part of the sub-discussion about trading for Dumba lol. I took issue with one or two people trying to shut down ANY discussion of trading Dumba. I don't think Dumba is a good fit for the Leafs based on current roster composition + what it would take to acquire him. I think a fair deal, though I'm not sure either base would like it, is Nylander for Dumba.This thread was derailed the moment it started. Hyman+? That’s the biggest troll post in this thread.
Okay, what’s a fair deal that you would be willing to part with to acquire Dumba?
Cool. Then you don't need to be in it. But you don't need to quote everyone that tries to continue it (as the person I originally quoted did) and try to shut down any further discussion. That's my original point. That's it. Nothing else.Re-read the entire thread and you'll see literally every Wild fan has made the same point throughout the thread. There's no more discussion to be had.
Cool. Then you don't need to be in it. But you don't need to quote everyone that tries to continue it (as the person I originally quoted did) and try to shut down any further discussion. That's my original point. That's it. Nothing else.
We have discussed it and we were offered one of the worst proposals I've ever seen with Hyman+.
If Dumba is ever moving, it's for a similarly aged Top 6 forward that's proven they have potential to be a top line winger.
Cool. Then you don't need to be in it. But you don't need to quote everyone that tries to continue it (as the person I originally quoted did) and try to shut down any further discussion. That's my original point. That's it. Nothing else.
Still not close.
Marner or Nylander+, or Dumba stays with us.
We'd be interested in Marner or Nylander+ for Dumba.
We'd be looking for Marner or Nylander+
Hyman ++ maybe?
Tell me your thoughts
I wouldn’t touch Nylander for Dumba. The Wild have plenty of regular season performers whom become a shell of themselves in the playoffs.Fellas, I'm not part of the sub-discussion about trading for Dumba lol. I took issue with one or two people trying to shut down ANY discussion of trading Dumba. I don't think Dumba is a good fit for the Leafs based on current roster composition + what it would take to acquire him. I think a fair deal, though I'm not sure either base would like it, is Nylander for Dumba.
Re-read the entire thread and you'll see literally every Wild fan has made the same point throughout the thread. There's no more discussion to be had.
I would actually say that every non-Leaf poster realizes that it's going to be Nylander moving if Minnesota were looking to make a deal with Dumba. There are only a few Leaf posters in here arguing otherwise... that should tell you that most of the Leaf posters realize these guys are out to lunch... or this thread would have 15+ pages.
IMO, Marner is too much from the TML side.
Then the delusion is strong on both sides.Not interested in anything less than Marner in a 1 for 1 deal. Nylander needs a +.
Then the delusion is strong on both sides.
It's not delusion. Wild fans have no interest in trading Dumba, yet are bombarded by at least one thread per week asking for him. If Leafs fans want Dumba, it's Marner or Nylander+, otherwise we have no incentive to trade him.
i would pay for Hymans flight!What would it take to get this smooth skating, physical, puck moving stud to the biggest and best hockey market around?
Hyman ++ maybe?
Tell me your thoughts