Yeah because playing time shouldn't be earned also we have so many physical d men alreadyI really dont like this move, only redeaming factor is that we didnt give him a dumb contract.
If he takes pt away from a legetimate prospect ill be pissed.
Anybody really believe this is a “depth”signing?
He will play 20 minutes a night giving us veteran mistakes.....errrr presence
This boards reaction to this signing is surprising given he checks off all the boxes of things you guys don't want for this team.
He's slow, gritty, is no better than Bieksa, and is taking minutes away from a guy like Welinski who deserves to actually ****ing play. Hate this signing.
Anybody really believe this is a “depth”signing?
He will play 20 minutes a night giving us veteran mistakes.....errrr presence
Holzer spent most of last year in SD. You're dreaming if you think Schenn isn't penciled in for 82 games in ANA of 16-20 minutes.This year's Holzer and he will play like him. If the youngsters can not outplay him they may be not so good. Imho he adds something we lack, net presence.
Just when you get rid of Bieksa... You sign another player to frustrate you with moronic mistakes and frequently being out of position.
He isn’t any good but the price and term make this a lot easier to stomach. Not going to burn the team if/when it doesn’t work out like the Stoner/Allen/Bieksa deals did
Holzer spent most of last year in SD. You're dreaming if you think Schenn isn't penciled in for 82 games in ANA of 16-20 minutes.
Well, what you're saying is that Bob and Randy truly are changed men as their hockey philosophy goes. I'm not there yet. IMO the only way Schenn plays 50ish games is due to injuries.I don’t think this is accurate. I think Bob wanted someone to compete with a youngster on the bottom pair. I think he’ll end up with 50ish games played
Okay, overall he isn’t a good hockey player though. This doesn’t make us a better team. All I’m sayingHe is good enough for a #6 or #7 role. And that's what he will be here.
Well, what you're saying is that Bob and Randy truly are changed men as their hockey philosophy goes. I'm not there yet. IMO the only way Schenn plays 50ish games is due to injuries.
You might be comfortable handing the 3rd pair to the 'kids,' but I think we need a veteran to occupy one of the spots on that pair. Also, at 800K, if he gets outplayed in the middle of the year, then it won't hurt much to just sit him in favor of Larsson, Pettersson, Welinski, etc. It's way different than Bieksa, since it's not the same as putting $4 million in the press box every night.
EDIT: Is there a chance he's going to be as bad as Bieksa? Yes, but I doubt there would be as much hesitation to sit him as there was with Bieksa.