WhatTheDuck
9 - 20 - 8
Pasta really is Terry lol
Physically quite similar. I don't think Terry's offensive game was as highly regarded at the same age.
Pasta really is Terry lol
Will Francis to Stephens via text:
"Feeling back to myself! Every week gets better and head up to school (Minnesota Duluth) soon. Will be playing this season."
Well no shit look where Terry was drafted lol.Physically quite similar. I don't think Terry's offensive game was as highly regarded at the same age.
That’s a kid I’m really rooting for. Would be an amazing story if he made it to the NHL.Will Francis to Stephens via text:
"Feeling back to myself! Every week gets better and head up to school (Minnesota Duluth) soon. Will be playing this season."
Ducks’ rankings in Wheeler’s top 50 drafted prospects (excluding goalies, which he will list tomorrow):
#4 Zegras
#17 Drysdale (also mentioned he considered him as high as #12)
#21 McTavish
NHL top 50 prospects, 2021 edition: Byfield, Caufield and Power headline Wheeler’s drafted skaters ranking
And Clarke's skating is mediocre and needs alot of work, Drysdale can skate circles around him lolRecency bias. The fact that Drysdale is 17 and Clarke is 7 is a joke. Drysdale was better pre draft and had as good of a d+1 as you can ask for.
Ducks’ rankings in Wheeler’s top 50 drafted prospects (excluding goalies, which he will list tomorrow):
#4 Zegras
#17 Drysdale (also mentioned he considered him as high as #12)
#21 McTavish (Wheeler said he’s bumped him up since the draft after being impressed by him at the WJSS)
NHL top 50 prospects, 2021 edition: Byfield, Caufield and Power headline Wheeler’s drafted skaters ranking
(For what it’s worth: I also recently learned that McTavish was the Blue Jackets’ target at fifth overall, so even if the Ducks didn’t take him, he wasn’t ever going to be around where I had him ranked.)
I’ve been cautious with my evaluations on Dostal over the years. He’s a skinny, smallish goalie who I’ve seen play some ugly games live and I think I’ve allowed those perceptions to linger a little too much. Over time, though, he has really turned me not just with his play but with the resume he has built for himself across several years and leagues. That continued last year out of Liiga and into the AHL. He’s not a very powerful goalie in the net given his size, but he’s agile through his shuffles, his control in the net is pristine on his outside edges, he stays with the play through screens, he’s compact in his movements and he makes a lot of recovery saves. I’m not convinced he’s going to be a starter, but it’s not hard to imagine him as a good tandem goalie at this point and he comfortably projects as a backup at the very least.
Wheeler has finally (somewhat) come around on Dostal, ranking him 7th among all drafted goalie prospects. Here is his write-up:
Cossa should be in the first tier but yeah, I think the other two ahead of (in his own teir) Dostal are justifiable.that’s pretty good considering the run of good goalie prospects league wide.
he has dostal in the second tier alongside cossa , wolf and swayman
It’s just so weird that Wheeler is just now coming around on Dostal. He’s seen some ‘ugly’ games? Did he not realize he won the Liiga award for best goalie? He was the best at his position in a top-4 league in the world.
I swear if he was a ‘big market’ prospect, there would be non-stop coverage of the guy.
One of the reasons I stopped my subscription to the Athletic. Some of their writers show extreme bias on who they like.
IIRC, Wheeler is height biased to Dostal. In his previous rankings, he docked Dostal from his top-10 because of his height, but put in another goalie of the same height in the top-10, but wasn't as productive as Dostal. Okay, Wheeler might also be NA biased too with height.
IIRC, Wheeler is height biased to Dostal. In his previous rankings, he docked Dostal from his top-10 because of his height, but put in another goalie of the same height in the top-10, but wasn't as productive as Dostal. Okay, Wheeler might also be NA biased too with height.
noticed this article today while aimlessly scrolling through info regarding our prospects. not sure if anyone else has seen this:
Draft Analyst Sam Cosentino Breaks Down Ducks Prospects, Talks Future Impact | San Diego Gulls
Slightly offtopic but recency bias in in full mode in the Mian Boards Draisaitl thread currently being revoked. In 2015 a lot of people were saying Hanifin is ways better than Draisaitl. Lol.Recency bias. The fact that Drysdale is 17 and Clarke is 7 is a joke. Drysdale was better pre draft and had as good of a d+1 as you can ask for.
Recency bias. The fact that Drysdale is 17 and Clarke is 7 is a joke. Drysdale was better pre draft and had as good of a d+1 as you can ask for.
It helped a lot that Tracey is 2 years older than vast majority of WHLers.Agreed. 18-year old Drysdale did struggle after a hot start in the NHL and that's what probably knocked him down the rankings. If Drysdale stayed in the AHL level, then he might be earning higher praises as he might have continued winning more Rookie of the Month awards.
Similarly, this is how a majority of Ducks fans feel about Tracey. 19-year old Tracey didn't produce any points at the AHL level and Ducks fans stopped caring at that point. Yet, once the WHL opened up again and Tracey was sent down to his WHL team, he led his team in scoring and was very productive on the PP, 12 points (6g + 6a) came on the PP out of his 19 point total. There's talent in Tracey, but it is really difficult to overcome the optics of not producing at point in 12 AHL games.