bearcountry17
Registered User
Dougie Hamilton must be the only top 5 Dman in league history to be 4th in ES TOIPG on his own team.
Dougie Hamilton must be the only top 5 Dman in league history to be 4th in ES TOIPG on his own team.
So why is it that throughout his career xGF and GF results that he's had away from star partners has remained good.
OP thinks Kase is a top 10 player, his thoughts dont matter.Yep, just look at like the first ten posts, and wait till OP contributes his thoughts...it'll be clear as day.
Hamilton is a loser. Nice guy, but loses and withers when the pressure is on.
The amount of spite Bruins fans have for Hamilton is remarkable. The guy played less than 3 seasons for you when he wasn't even old enough to buy a beer... let it go.
You're right. I did let it go. And I was eventually wrong about Kessel being a loser so Hamilton may be the same. But for whatever reason, we can both agree that when he faces the Bruins he falters and isn't nearly as effective compared to playing anyone else in the NHL.
For whatever reason, he turns back into that guy who couldn't hold a beer when facing the Bruins.
All of that is great, but it doesn't prove me wrong.
I haven't followed Hamilton's career extremely closely, but what I've read is that he tends to be a player that doesn't get along with teammates and that causes locker room problems. It could be wrong. If it is, explain why I'm wrong. I'm sure you are well aware of the perception out there.
love taking a semi serious take from a year ago and acting like i still believe itOP thinks Kase is a top 10 player, his thoughts dont matter.
The fact that you ever thought he was a top 10 player says enough everyone needs to know.love taking a semi serious take from a year ago and acting like i still believe it
my top 10 list right now, not in order, would be something similar to point pettersson stone mcdavid panarin marchand bergeron couturier o'reilly pastrnak
Drew Doughty, without a question. Hamilton is just so consistently overrated, because of who he's had the privilege of playing with, and the roles he's been able to play...it's kind of hilarious. He can produce points, and get dragged to a good results overall...but he's such a leach, and really not anywhere near the defenceman he's made out to be on paper.
It's actually vice versa, Hamilton has made his linemates better over the past 4 seasons.
I feel like all that actually shows, is that yeah...a D pairing does better when Dougie spends 75-90% of his icetime with a particular top-end #1D.
As well as maybe suggesting that when Dougie hasn't been playing with his 75-90% of the time steady partner...it's usually because of some outside factors like injury and/or trying to shelter some other partner by playing them with the actual best, steadiest, most capable defenceman on the pairing (Gio/Slavin).
ie. The Gio/Slavin numbers without Hamilton, are influenced heavily by some really bad, young, inexperienced, or otherwise probably in way over their head partners being forced into that spot to try to "protect" them, combined with the benefit of familiarity in having two defencemen play together 75-90% of the time, which is lost when they're separated.
Whereas conversely, those "Dougie without Gio/Slavin" numbers, do show that he cannot carry a pairing himself. The only years he kinda held serve while separated from his #1D partner, are 2018-19 where he played the majority of the rest of his icetime with TVR, who is a reasonably capable defenceman in his own right. And 2019-20, with a whopping 77 minutes he played without Slavin, which is a laughable sample size. And i'd wager if you cross-reference those sample sizes based on OZ%, you'd see in both cases...much softer, offensive minutes, with far less matchup duty against opposing top players. Basically...Dougie without Gio, was substantially worse. Dougie without Slavin, probably just comes down to Pesce (who is also better than Hamilton) and others like Faulk and TVR at the time as RHD taking the brunt of tougher minutes, combined with a small sample size in the one case.
Stats and analytics without context, are pretty much useless. You can see what you want in generalized numbers like that, and can find numbers to suit whatever you're after. But when you consider it in context, they're not really screaming what you think they are.
They're screaming that Dougie Hamilton is a fine complementary defenceman, who can provide good results when playing with a better, actual #1D. That's about it. Which makes him overrated in my books, with the way some people want to suggest he's a true #1D and so on.