Well, same chance really. 12.5% after Pittsburgh does their thing.Mo chance for Laffy <3
Well, same chance really. 12.5% after Pittsburgh does their thing.Mo chance for Laffy <3
He's never allowed to play hockey again, according to some people that post here.So if he is not going to be allowed to play now, what will make him be able to play when next season starts? This virus is never going away. Are they going to prevent him from playing next season as well?
You mean a guy who gets tested routinely for the very virus they're worried about? There's very little testing in the general public. Testing in the bubble is mandatory.Probably a little bit, lining up at faceoff and having a guy breathing on him, having guys coughing and clearing there throats on the bench etc
No, likely not. That doesn’t mean you can minimize that it IS a risk factor as the post I quoted tried to do.
Well there’s one thing I know for sure. Regardless of which way the team doctors and potentially an independent third party doctor rule on this, there will be plenty of armchair experts on the internet to inform them that they’re wrong.
Kakko has type 1 diabetes too and the Rangers organization has said he’s playing.
Type 1 diabetes (especially in a young professional athlete) does not present any risk.
Taking away one of Montreals top forwards diminishes the chances of them luckily winning 3 games, so ya, their odds of losing and therefore winning Laffy increases.Well, same chance really. 12.5% after Pittsburgh does their thing.
You mean a guy who gets tested routinely for the very virus they're worried about? There's very little testing in the general public. Testing in the bubble is mandatory.
I maintain that they remain right around zero to advance and the same 12.5% to win 1st.Taking away one of Montreals top forwards diminishes the chances of them luckily winning 3 games, so ya, their odds of losing and therefore winning Laffy increases.
I just meant more danger in actually coming in contact with the virusYou mean a guy who gets tested routinely for the very virus they're worried about? There's very little testing in the general public. Testing in the bubble is mandatory.
The people doing that to him will be frequently tested to keep this thing going. Assuming there's a 14 day period prior to this thing getting off of the ground, nobody in the bubble should be testing positive at any point.In real life, people he's potentially interacting with on a daily basis will not be face washing him with their gloves, gurgling Gatorate and spitting it out in his general area, trash talking him in close quarters, scrumming in close quarters, touching and hugging when they score a goal.
There’s plenty of it out there. Type I is an autoimmune issue, type II is a genetic factor that also gives you high blood pressure that COVID likes to attack.
The people doing that to him will be frequently tested to keep this thing going. Assuming there's a 14 day period prior to this thing getting off of the ground, nobody in the bubble should be testing positive at any point.
In the general public, there's absolutely no knowing who's walking around asymptomatic.
He can appeal but quite frankly why bother.
Type 1 diabetes (especially in a young professional athlete) does not present any risk.
Exactly. Regarding Kakko The kid has been practicing nonstop in Finland during this whole pandemic with 3-4 other players on the ice. I'm sure he's seen the best specialists in finland and in NY. I think they all know a bit more than we do. His blood sugars are probably better managed than most of the people on this board lolIs it any more dangerous for him to be playing in the bubble than it would be for him to continue living, shopping, exercising, etc at home?
From what I've read that is correct its all about blood sugar management/a1c levels.Haven't heard anything about young and otherwise healthy and well-managed type 1 diabetics being at any increased risk. Any info on that? I assume if the diabetes is type 1 and well-controlled there's no medical difference between him and an otherwise identical person without diabetes.
Considering there's a significant amount of league revenue involved, I'd assume daily at the very least.Players are testing positive in Phase 2 in small groups on a regular basis in pre-camp. Once you have an entire conference of players under one tent, there's going to be risk. How often can we even expect these guys to get tested, once every 48-72 hours between games?
I would just stay home.
Experts believe Kaapo Kakko's risk for coronavirus is manageableDo you have any support to this claim? I'm reading this post with an open mind, and I'm genuinely interested to see if this is true.
Is it any more dangerous for him to be playing in the bubble than it would be for him to continue living, shopping, exercising, etc at home?
People have already shared several links in this thread with experts saying Type 1 diabetes is not an increased risk if it's well managed. If the Canadian health agency makes Domi sit out, then it appears they're the ones not listening to the science, not the Americans.If anyone actually read the article. It's guidelines set by the Public Health Agency of Canada.
"The Public Health Agency of Canada has a list of people who are considered to be in the high-risk group for severe illness from contracting COVID-19, and diabetes is listed among the pre-existing conditions. Any doctor evaluating Domi would deem him unfit to play for this reason."
"Domi and the Canadiens would be able to seek a second opinion in this case, but the government guidelines are quite clear in this case. It seems as though he will not be able to join the team on the ice when Stage 3 begins in the coming days."
So the Canadiens would let him play but they have to abide by the guidelines set by the Canadian Government. So it's not the NHL or Canadiens sitting him just because, there's a valid reason.
As for Kakko, the US is a mess right now and probably don't have a guideline or whatever and that's why the Rangers said he will play. It's just gonna "vanish" in the States.
If anyone actually read the article. It's guidelines set by the Public Health Agency of Canada.
"The Public Health Agency of Canada has a list of people who are considered to be in the high-risk group for severe illness from contracting COVID-19, and diabetes is listed among the pre-existing conditions. Any doctor evaluating Domi would deem him unfit to play for this reason."
"Domi and the Canadiens would be able to seek a second opinion in this case, but the government guidelines are quite clear in this case. It seems as though he will not be able to join the team on the ice when Stage 3 begins in the coming days."
So the Canadiens would let him play but they have to abide by the guidelines set by the Canadian Government. So it's not the NHL or Canadiens sitting him just because, there's a valid reason.
As for Kakko, the US is a mess right now and probably don't have a guideline or whatever and that's why the Rangers said he will play. It's just gonna "vanish" in the States.