You should probably draft one of them then. We'll take Kakko.For all we know Turcotte or Byram could end up being the best players from this draft. Look at 2017 draft. 1&2 Heisher and Patrick or 4 and 16 Makar and Valimaki? It would be hard to turn down that 2 for 1 deal
Makar and your 4thOA may get you Kakko
And it's bonkers to think the Av's would give up Makar to move up two picksI love these threads.
OP: Do the rangers have any interest in trading something they have no interest in trading and absolutely do not have to trade?
Rangers Fans: Not unless it’s for overpayment.
Everyone Else: OMG WTF NO HAR HAR HAR ITS NOT WORTH THAT.
We have NO reason to trade the pick. These threads are a waste of time.
And it's bonkers to think the Av's would give up Makar to move up two picks
For what? A bag of pucks?Canucks fans offer Virtanen + 10th + Eriksson
Can't argue with that, however when it's suggested that it would take MacKinnon, Makar and the 4th OA to just get NYR to listen that goes from overpayment to just plain stupidity.I love these threads.
OP: Do the rangers have any interest in trading something they have no interest in trading and absolutely do not have to trade?
Rangers Fans: Not unless it’s for overpayment.
Everyone Else: OMG WTF NO HAR HAR HAR ITS NOT WORTH THAT.
We have NO reason to trade the pick. These threads are a waste of time.
I'm sure they will be.Then they can pick at 4 and be happy about it
For what? A bag of pucks?
Can't argue with that, however when it's suggested that it would take MacKinnon, Makar and the 4th OA to just get NYR to listen that goes from overpayment to just plain stupidity.
And how do you know where/how the Rangers value the pick?It’s an insane overpayment. Would never happen. Would never even be offered ever. But I think the general thing here is the Rangers have no reason to give that pick up, so if you want it, it’s going to hurt.
A cap dump, reclamation project and 10th overall for 2nd overall?Dude that’s a good offer. Stop overrating draft picks.
I use two things called logic and common sense.And how do you know where/how the Rangers value the pick?
He’s joking dude...A cap dump, reclamation project and 10th overall for 2nd overall?
Lmao.
The sign you have no more arguments. Thanks for playing.Guess again
Might be, can't be sure these days with some of the Devils fans.He’s joking dude...
Too funnyThe sign you have no more arguments. Thanks for playing.
A cap dump, reclamation project and 10th overall for 2nd overall?
Lmao.
Of course they don't have a reason to trade the #2 pick, cost-controlled high potential assets are very valuable and any team would be stupid not to ask for an overpayment. However, some of the suggested overpayments in this thread are a bit ridiculous, including Makar + 4OA.It’s an insane overpayment. Would never happen. Would never even be offered ever. But I think the general thing here is the Rangers have no reason to give that pick up, so if you want it, it’s going to hurt.
I say it all the time but the world is a better place than it would have been had the internet existed when all 6 Sutter brothers were playing.Yeah I was being sarcastic. Canucks fans were pretty brutal right around the draft in an effort to unite the Hughes brothers. My question is what do they plan on doing when it’s Luke Hughes’ draft year?
It would have to be ridiculous though. When a team is attempting to get something from another that is not on the block and they have no interest in trading, they name the price. I don't think the Rangers would trade Kakko for 4 and Makar.Of course they don't have a reason to trade the #2 pick, cost-controlled high potential assets are very valuable and any team would be stupid not to ask for an overpayment. However, some of the suggested overpayments in this thread are a bit ridiculous, including Makar + 4OA.