billybudd
Registered User
- Feb 1, 2012
- 22,049
- 2,249
It might not normally be a big deal but when you have Crosby and Malkin making basically 9 mill a year each and a super expensive long term deal to Letang you cannot really afford to overpay in other roles. It's a primary source of my criticism for Shero and his tendancy to ship picks and prospects for rentals. You need players playing above their cap hits to offset the the big contracts the team already has. Trading Staal was absolutely the right move the only problem is how it was handled since then. Over paying older veterans who's production has been inflated by playing with the greatest playmaker in the world is not exactly smart. Going all in and trading off good picks and prospects for a bottom 6'er and a guy your coach apparently didnt want anyways is not a smart move. So in a bubble this dodging of the Staal contract is very good for the team but in the reality of merely transfering what Staal wouldve gotten to Dupuis and guys like Tanner Glass... I am not so sure we're totally better off.
I agree with the point about rentals and cap savings on entry level contracts. Unless you think you're X acquisitions that can be made at the deadline away, it should almost never be done.
Where I disagree is that Staal is a) an older veteran, b) numerically inflated by playing with Crosby and c) overpriced for what he does. If you have Staal, for 20 minutes a night, the puck doesn't get to your side of the ice. Breaking out when he's on the ice is laboriously difficult and getting the puck away from him on the wall is damn near impossible, as we saw when he was winning one on threes against us the last time we played Carolina. And he dominated us with Gerbe and Dwyer riding shotgun. Alone, the guy constitutes a successful line.
That's easily worth $6 million to me.