StreetHawk
Registered User
- Sep 30, 2017
- 26,417
- 9,884
The cold, calculated, rational move would be to trade them, and then re-sign them, yes,
But I can respect that they don't want to go anywhere. And while I usually am on the "trade away vets" bandwagon at the deadline, the Sedins are a different case and simply deserve different treatment.
I can understand from their end. Even if they were to accept being traded to a contender, would it be worth it to maybe have a small chance of winning with a team you have no affiliation toward, with teammates you don't know, and leave behind the city, team and family you've been with your entire career? I'm not sure.
I can really understand, and believe they're telling the truth, when in that Player's Tribune article they say that even if they could win with another team, it just wouldn't feel the same.
They're not going to Sundin us. They're going to come back or retire. The Sedins, for all intents and purposes, ARE the Canucks. Let them do what they want.
And because of their stance, I feel that when the contractual obligation ends in June, that should be the end of the relationship.
There's no point in keeping them around.
How much leadership do they really bring? Team has been the 3rd, 2nd and currently the 4th worst team in the NHL. It's not like the team is going to fall 10 spots in the standings without them.
Plus, the way this management group has viewed the twins and made moves since "it wouldn't be fair to the twins", either the twins go or management goes. Can't both be here.
Plus, should there be a change in GM, the team needs to let the new GM decide if they are worth bringing back. Only thing JB should have asked their agent was if they have changed their minds about getting traded at the TDL. If the answer is still no, that's find. Discussion ends.