McDeathbyCheerios*
Guest
Nurse was playing hard minutes to start the year and that was a mistake. That is a good example.Exhibit A: Nurse. Being ruined as we speak.
Nurse was playing hard minutes to start the year and that was a mistake. That is a good example.Exhibit A: Nurse. Being ruined as we speak.
What are you even talking about now. So Schultz should of started playing 0 minutes a night playing against no one because he might have to play against someone who might be playing good?Yes because every night the 1st line is the best line..Ah, that's what I've been missing...You're assuming because he doesn't always play #1 or #2 line that it's easy competition? No wonder...
Never mind...I get it now...
Nurse was playing hard minutes to start the year and that was a mistake. That is a good example.
How am i using it in a vacuum. I am comparing it to the other players he is playing with to show a point that he was being sheltered while getting top 4 minutesActually i use numbers myself BUT you cant just use numbers in a vacuum and then extrapolate that to opinions regarding other player in other scenarios and then claim its bullet proof.
Thats just silliness.
You said playing top 4 minutes is bad for a rookie. I am showing you it isn't as long as the player can be sheltered and isn't 18
Nurse came in hot so they played him higher.It's baffling to me that they're developing Davidson, a 6/7 guy, properly and Nurse, a top 4, improperly.
Okay then. Show me 21 year old dmen who come into the league after going the full college experience and were ruined due to top 4 ice time.I did and its true. Top 4 minutes are not an effective way to develop a rookie dman.
You have not proven that to be false at all.
All you have managed to do is to post some exceptions but that doesn mean your exceptions are the rule. They arent.
Every scenario has its own challenges and its own set of variables that makes them poor comparisons.
And Nurse has cooled off considerably.Nurse came in hot so they played him higher.
Davidson came in cold and got better as the year got on and got more ice time.
And is playing less than before..And Nurse has cooled off considerably.
Huh?
Petry/Smid was hardly one of the best top pairing tandems in the NHL. Hardly even a legit top pairing combo...more like a solid 2nd pairing on any decent team. You are using a 48 game season to arrive at faulty conclusions.
So for you Smid went from being a solid top pairing dman to an expendable player in 1 year? Nonsense.
The point is the Schultz should have been playing bottom pairing minutes from day 1.
Not 2nd pairing minutes (behind a suspect top pair) which was forced on him by the roster inadequacies.
Schultz even looked good in those minutes that season.Statistically, they were that season.
Very few pairings played more minutes, against tougher competition and allowed less goals.
There was no way Schultz was going to start on the 3rd pairing after the AHL season he had. And there was no one complaining he wasn't at that time.
It's baffling to me that they're developing Davidson, a 6/7 guy, properly and Nurse, a top 4, improperly.
What are you even talking about now. So Schultz should of started playing 0 minutes a night playing against no one because he might have to play against someone who might be playing good?
"qualcomp" is a great concept.
How "qualcomp" is measured? Your mileage may vary as you can make an argument that the entire foundation of the measurement is built on sand, and therefore of dubious real value.
Don't you make me post the Ristolainen 2014-15 and Nurse 2015-16 warrior charts again.
Buffalo didn't ruin Risto and Edmonton isn't ruining Nurse.
Statistically, they were that season.
Very few pairings played more minutes, against tougher competition and allowed less goals.
There was no way Schultz was going to start on the 3rd pairing after the AHL season he had. And there was no one complaining he wasn't at that time.
No but they are in danger of ruining nurse. If he spends another year on this team with no insulation he is in very deep danger of spoiling his potential
OT but I have to give that Smid-Petry pairing some love. They were great and so underrated even by our own fans. They were amazing at preventing high quality scoring chances -- against tough competition too. One of the big reasons why Dudnyk had decent numbers.
Petry never looked as good after Smid was traded, and that was the beginning of the end for him. **** you MacT.
I got free tix to the Anaheim game last week. Free...Red Seats....and I had to ho and hum over if I was going to waste my time with going to the game. A few expensive drinks later, it was still a waste of time.
People just sit there, on their phones disinterested in the game being played in front of them. Everyone sits like a drone, glancing at their phones from time to time.
The games are so boring. I heckled a few times, calling Kessler a bum but nobody says anything or talks. they just sit there.
Even when they sucked in the 90s it was a bit more entertaining with the fans. People used to heckle and people jeered at the bad guys.
Oh well.
It's baffling to me that they're developing Davidson, a 6/7 guy, properly and Nurse, a top 4, improperly.
Don't you make me post the Ristolainen 2014-15 and Nurse 2015-16 warrior charts again.
Buffalo didn't ruin Risto and Edmonton isn't ruining Nurse.