Well....
1) "we were fine before Dinamo existed" - define fine. Also, we aren't debating if Dinamo is some sort of game-changer. We should debate if it's negative or positive to have such a team. And my point is any, any actual pro team is a huge bonus to the hockey system. And Latvia has very little options other than playing in the KHL.
2) You berated half of the Latvian NT, the list of players you deem worthy of playing there is way shorter than those you don't (Dzierkals, Zile, Balinskis, anyone from 4th line, etc). Every young player as well, really. If it was up to you I guess Latvian NT would ice 10 players. It doesn't quite work that way, though. Lots of players develop a successful career but that's the whole point, to you, they are all **** if they don't produce at 21. Didn't you scream how bad Dzierkals is?
3) Dinamo had 3 Latvian Ds last year, 2 of them are younger than Jaks. So I don't really know why would you mention him at all.
4) "My dude, where do you think Dinamo gets its money from? In what way is it not an artificial prop-up? Its a Kremlin project through and thorugh". What?
What does one have to do with another? If it's Kremlin project is it not a hockey team? I would love if Latvia had money to have their own hockey team which wasn't a Kremlin project. But you don't. So unless you explain how this particular Kremlin project does more harm than good I'm at a loss what this "prop-up" point is.