Devils team discussion (news, notes and speculation) - part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.

Better Call Sal

Salnalysis
Nov 24, 2011
25,137
37,270
New Jersey
i get being against a coach that isn't good but if the shelf life of coaching career is 2 franchises (one is a joke franchise) and 450ish games to prove it or you dont deserve another gig? thats insane but hey each their own standard

i think this board has very limited criteria much like ufa/trade options in the coaching standards. going to be a banger on here when they eventually do hire someone thats for sure lol

Coaching shelf lives in the NHL are not very long, and I am sure there are coaches who rarely get a second crack at an NHL head job let alone a third. The only year Tocchet took a team to the playoffs was in the COVID play-in tournament that occurred in the bubble when they expanded the number of teams. Otherwise, he'd never have sniffed the playoffs in either tenure.

Does John MacLean deserve a second crack at a job? :laugh: It's a results league, for better or worse. And that's certainly why Torts, Laviolette, DeBoer and others get more kicks at the can. They get results until their shelf life expires.
 

NJDfan86

Registered User
Dec 29, 2021
878
1,216
I haven't seen anyone here campaigning for Green.

Thinking that Fitz may stay with him is another thing entirely.

I don't see why we are conflating Fitz not trashing Green and the remaining staff, who he knows will all be looking for jobs next year, as some sort of vote of confidence.

These guys are dead men walking - does throwing additional dirt on their grave so that some fans won't complain make a difference? Has no one here had a job where a door closes through no fault of their own, and the organization they were working for helped them find another job?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Camille the Eel

Omar Little

Omar comin yo
Jun 12, 2006
5,167
1,352
Massachusetts
Define Cheap. Henrique is not going to be cheap lol


I would do ALOT of things to get Yanni Gourde here. Absolutely in love with him but I doubt SEA is moving him

It all depends on what Henrique wants in his career. Does he want to win? If so, then I think something like $3m - $3.5m would make sense and Devils should consider it. If he wants to try and secure another bag, then it'll be $4m - $4.5m, which we shouldn't pay.

Another good buy low guy would be Arvidsson
 

Devils Trap

Registered User
May 6, 2009
28,280
1,933
New Jersey
It all depends on what Henrique wants in his career. Does he want to win? If so, then I think something like $3m - $3.5m would make sense and Devils should consider it. If he wants to try and secure another bag, then it'll be $4m - $4.5m, which we shouldn't pay.

Another good buy low guy would be Arvidsson
I promise you Henrique's bare minimum will be 4.5 million going up. There is no world he gets 3 million lol

He will get 5+ million on the open market. 4.5 million is the discount
 

NjDevsRR

Anything Can Happen In Jersey
Apr 24, 2012
28,650
57,078
Belmar
What do you consider the old boys club?
IMG_7803.gif
 

Bleedred

Travis Green BLOWS! Bring back Nasreddine!
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
130,152
57,476


I chuckled at this part...

LeafsDaws fan just posted this and made a thread about it on the main board. The thread is already being watered down with arguments about whether Brodeur is the GOAT or not. He certainly isn’t when it comes to being a management person.

Not really liking that quote. Great timing for it because I was mentioning last night I said the goalie decisions have been weird for years now. And that it was weird they didn’t let Kahkonen start after getting a shutout. And now I wonder if Marty is the puppet master with some of these things……

It sounds like Rogalski isn’t exactly behind playing the shit out of the goalies. That quote doesn’t necessarily mean that this is really a problem, but putting everything together and adding it up…….It’s looking suspect.

We have a problem with running the same goalie out there too much. Daws in 2022 and this year after Vitek got hurt. Vitek this year was another case of it.

Weird things like Schmid starting two nights in a row (second time he had to because Vitek was sick and I think he was a late scratch because of it) and Daws got two nights in a row not even two months ago.

Blackwood starting multiple days in a row back in 20-21 and then them playing the shit out of him before they shut him down for a couple of months in 21-22. And all the “we’re giving him the ball” stuff. Maybe these weren’t really Ruff or at least not just him…..
 

JrFischer54

Registered User
Apr 4, 2017
10,268
4,010
Coaching shelf lives in the NHL are not very long, and I am sure there are coaches who rarely get a second crack at an NHL head job let alone a third. The only year Tocchet took a team to the playoffs was in the COVID play-in tournament that occurred in the bubble when they expanded the number of teams. Otherwise, he'd never have sniffed the playoffs in either tenure.

Does John MacLean deserve a second crack at a job? :laugh: It's a results league, for better or worse. And that's certainly why Torts, Laviolette, DeBoer and others get more kicks at the can. They get results until their shelf life expires.

not right after he got canned here he didn't. if hes been a steady asst coach in the meantime i wouldn't bash a team for hiring him and giving him a short leash. would i hire him? no but i'm biased because I like old "retread" good old boy hockey coaches for my team.



I chuckled at this part...

i agree with marty. goalies are quickly becoming starting pitchers in baseball. if you can have forwards/d go out there 20+ min a night getting hit blocking shots skating miles i really dont think its much to ask for goalies to play 60-65 games or 10 in a row.
 

njdevils1982

Hell Toupée!!!
Sep 8, 2006
38,150
24,940
North of Toronto
LeafsDaws fan just posted this and made a thread about it on the main board. The thread is already being watered down with arguments about whether Brodeur is the GOAT or not. He certainly isn’t when it comes to being a management person.

Not really liking that quote. Great timing for it because I was mentioning last night I said the goalie decisions have been weird for years now. And that it was weird they didn’t let Kahkonen start after getting a shutout. And now I wonder if Marty is the puppet master with some of these things……

It sounds like Rogalski isn’t exactly behind playing the shit out of the goalies. That quote doesn’t necessarily mean that this is really a problem, but putting everything together and adding it up…….It’s looking suspect.

We have a problem with running the same goalie out there too much. Daws in 2022 and this year after Vitek got hurt. Vitek this year was another case of it.

Weird things like Schmid starting two nights in a row (second time he had to because Vitek was sick and I think he was a late scratch because of it) and Daws got two nights in a row not even two months ago.

Blackwood starting multiple days in a row back in 20-21 and then them playing the shit out of him before they shut him down for a couple of months in 21-22. And all the “we’re giving him the ball” stuff. Maybe these weren’t really Ruff or at least not just him…..

he doesn't seem like a bad poster ...i just remember him posting here how were gonna like andreas after he was traded here.

we all know what happened

but like i said, seems like a decent poster that doesn't have 'an agenda'
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
67,395
31,700
LeafsDaws fan just posted this and made a thread about it on the main board. The thread is already being watered down with arguments about whether Brodeur is the GOAT or not. He certainly isn’t when it comes to being a management person.

Not really liking that quote. Great timing for it because I was mentioning last night I said the goalie decisions have been weird for years now. And that it was weird they didn’t let Kahkonen start after getting a shutout. And now I wonder if Marty is the puppet master with some of these things……

It sounds like Rogalski isn’t exactly behind playing the shit out of the goalies. That quote doesn’t necessarily mean that this is really a problem, but putting everything together and adding it up…….It’s looking suspect.

We have a problem with running the same goalie out there too much. Daws in 2022 and this year after Vitek got hurt. Vitek this year was another case of it.

Weird things like Schmid starting two nights in a row (second time he had to because Vitek was sick and I think he was a late scratch because of it) and Daws got two nights in a row not even two months ago.

Blackwood starting multiple days in a row back in 20-21 and then them playing the shit out of him before they shut him down for a couple of months in 21-22. And all the “we’re giving him the ball” stuff. Maybe these weren’t really Ruff or at least not just him…..
It has occurred to me more than once this year that 'why are we trying to overplay these guys as if they're Marty?', but I never really made the leap of Marty himself being the puppet master for it. Maybe cause I don't want to believe he's also behind the shitty goalie acquisition choices as well, though I do think he's behind the shitty goalie coach choices :P

Plus tbh I think any head coach who's jockeying to keep his job when the team's behind the eight-ball is gonna run someone into the ground and wouldn't need much convincing from Marty either way.
 

Billdo

Registered User
Oct 28, 2008
19,465
16,332
Ocean County
LeafsDaws fan just posted this and made a thread about it on the main board. The thread is already being watered down with arguments about whether Brodeur is the GOAT or not. He certainly isn’t when it comes to being a management person.

Not really liking that quote. Great timing for it because I was mentioning last night I said the goalie decisions have been weird for years now. And that it was weird they didn’t let Kahkonen start after getting a shutout. And now I wonder if Marty is the puppet master with some of these things……

It sounds like Rogalski isn’t exactly behind playing the shit out of the goalies. That quote doesn’t necessarily mean that this is really a problem, but putting everything together and adding it up…….It’s looking suspect.

We have a problem with running the same goalie out there too much. Daws in 2022 and this year after Vitek got hurt. Vitek this year was another case of it.

Weird things like Schmid starting two nights in a row (second time he had to because Vitek was sick and I think he was a late scratch because of it) and Daws got two nights in a row not even two months ago.

Blackwood starting multiple days in a row back in 20-21 and then them playing the shit out of him before they shut him down for a couple of months in 21-22. And all the “we’re giving him the ball” stuff. Maybe these weren’t really Ruff or at least not just him…..
What's the cliff notes version of this? I don't have The Athletic anymore since Corey left.
 

Bleedred

Travis Green BLOWS! Bring back Nasreddine!
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
130,152
57,476
Based on?

Not that it's a big sample, but I do feel this is a bit of a audition for him. Why wouldn't Fitz view it as that?
I don't think he's coming back and I don't think he ever was. Fitz heavily implied it when he was acquired.

And they wouldn't even let him play the next game after he got a shutout, if that tells you anything. They went right back to Allen. I was in favor of letting him get last night's game after the shutout.

I think the only way he was ever coming back was if they made the decision to keep him over Allen and trade Allen's $1.9 somewhere else in the offseason. Since Allen got here they've only even given him 2 games. His first game was before Allen was able to play for immigration reasons.

If they're trying to audition him I feel they would give him more games and give him the next game after a shutout. It feels like he's probably only gonna get 3 of the remaining 9 games. The two back to backs and maybe one other.

Maybe if we can't get anything done with any of the ''Big fish'' goalies and the only option is to trade for Gibson (who isn't even better than Allen at this point and is expensive/3 more years of term remaining) or bring back Kahkonen to platoon with Allen, maybe they bring him back.
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
67,395
31,700
I think he knows.

But I wouldn't be totally adverse to this being the tandem. Allen we know is in, or at least most likely. And Kahk is a 28 year old who imo was probably having his numbers dragged down playing behind a bad team in SJ. Should also be cheap on the next contract.

Then we have Daws, Schmid, and Poulter in the AHL, which I think is very solid minor league depth.

Finding elite level goal tending is tough, and expensive, and a guy like Markstrom isn't necessarily an elite option, so in lieu of that I like the idea of attacking the problem with numbers.


Based on?

Not that it's a big sample, but I do feel this is a bit of a audition for him. Why wouldn't Fitz view it as that?
When you A) have as poor numbers as Kakkohnen the last two years with no real positive sample size prior other than two meh years as a clear backup and B) the GM basically says he traded for you to get 'flexibility', there's not much of a chance you'll do enough in a five-seven game sample size to change anyone's mind. There is possibly a world where they keep Kahkonnen as backup and trade Allen but they're clearly not going to roll it back with both when Fitz's ass is in the jackpot with his goalie choices next year and he's been trying to go big-game hunting for at least a year.

Even if Kahkonnen would take a two-way deal and go down to Utica why would you want him taking time away from Daws, Poulter and Schmid?
 

Bleedred

Travis Green BLOWS! Bring back Nasreddine!
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
130,152
57,476
What's the cliff notes version of this? I don't have The Athletic anymore since Corey left.
I'm not sure. I'm not a subscriber anymore because I didn't wanna pay $8 bucks a month for it instead of the $1 and $2 dollars I was paying the first two years.

Perhaps this is a borderline joke taken out of context. I sure hope it was. I'm sure he was laughing when he said it, but if he really thinks 5 games in 8 nights for a goalie is no big thing.....
he doesn't seem like a bad poster ...i just remember him posting here how were gonna like andreas after he was traded here.

we all know what happened

but like i said, seems like a decent poster that doesn't have 'an agenda'
No, but he is kind of weird about the Daws stuff, suggesting we're wasting him if he's not given an NHL spot out of the gate next year.

If Daws right now is as good as he thinks he really is, then we have at least 3 NHL caliber goalies next year when we pick up somebody else, but to give him a spot on the opening nigh roster? No way. We already did that this year with Schmid after a good season and playoffs, which didn't go over so well for this year.
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
67,395
31,700
The Devils tandem is going to be X-Allen, not Allen-X
Yeah even if Allen has a great twelve or so games, I wouldn't trust him with a 1A spot given his last few years. Sure he was a 1 once but he's also older now. The last time he was good as a starter was 2016-17, the last time he was even okay-ish was two years later, since then he's either been a decent backup or a poor starter.
 

devilsblood

Registered User
Mar 10, 2010
29,544
11,813
CF/60CA/60CF%xGF/60xGA/60xGF%
October
66.67​
58.82​
58.82
2.79​
2.59​
51.88​
November
62.56​
56.22​
56.22
2.74​
2.00
57.79
December
72.1
48.77
59.65
3.46
2.58​
57.3
January
62.35​
57.39​
52.07​
2.85​
2.88
49.77
February
72.62
63.39
53.39​
3.14​
3.23
49.29
March
68.42​
56.15​
54.93​
3.28
2.56​
56.19​

Pretty obvious dip in his performance, particularly defensive performance, during February. Especially following his fantastic play in November and December where he was legitimately playing at a top pairing level.

The Corsi numbers in Feb look alright because he was shooting with volume. He personally had 111 shot attempts in November, 17th most by any defenseman in the league that month. He was on the ice for the 10th most unblocked shots for, but also on the ice for the 6th most unblocked shot attempts against. He was playing very high event hockey, not something you want to do with the worst goalie play in the league.
Team numbers are very similar, low CFA in dec, higher in Jan and Feb.

Also not sure if Luke shooting more is indicative of a tired player. Maybe a player trying to do too much.
 

devilsblood

Registered User
Mar 10, 2010
29,544
11,813
I don't think he's coming back and I don't think he ever was. Fitz heavily implied it when he was acquired.

And they wouldn't even let him play the next game after he got a shutout, if that tells you anything. They went right back to Allen. I was in favor of letting him get last night's game after the shutout.

I think the only way he was ever coming back was if they made the decision to keep him over Allen and trade Allen's $1.9 somewhere else in the offseason. Since Allen got here they've only even given him 2 games. His first game was before Allen was able to play for immigration reasons.

If they're trying to audition him I feel they would give him more games and give him the next game after a shutout. It feels like he's probably only gonna get 3 of the remaining 9 games. The two back to backs and maybe one other.

Maybe if we can't get anything done with any of the ''Big fish'' goalies and the only option is to trade for Gibson (who isn't even better than Allen at this point and is expensive/3 more years of term remaining) or bring back Kahkonen to platoon with Allen, maybe they bring him back.

When you A) have as poor numbers as Kakkohnen the last two years with no real positive sample size prior other than two meh years as a clear backup and B) the GM basically says he traded for you to get 'flexibility', there's not much of a chance you'll do enough in a five-seven game sample size to change anyone's mind. There is possibly a world where they keep Kahkonnen as backup and trade Allen but they're clearly not going to roll it back with both when Fitz's ass is in the jackpot with his goalie choices next year and he's been trying to go big-game hunting for at least a year.

Even if Kahkonnen would take a two-way deal and go down to Utica why would you want him taking time away from Daws, Poulter and Schmid?
But what if the clear upgrade is not there? We all ask why a trade was not made for a goalie in Dec or Jan, well, probably because there wasn't a trade to be made(though I bet he could have gotten Kahkonen earlier).

I dunno, maybe he does make that trade for Markstrom, but as I say above, having 2 mid 30 goalies sounds pretty risky.

While trading for Saros sounds very expensive, on multiple fronts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

Cheddabombs

Status Quo
Mar 13, 2012
24,719
31,464
The Devils ran goalies to the ground this year because they've all sucked. So when one of then finally played good enough they ran with it. Last year the split was pretty even, I don't recall Vitek being hurt, or at least hurt for an extended period, and he only played 52 games.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad