As usual, your almost perverse, "blame everything on Cory" bias is showing:
Goal 1 chance is created because Severson thinks he's Wayne Gretzky and because Noesen played defense covering for Severson poorly. Could Cory stop it? Maybe. But I'd hardly call that "on Cory".
Goal 3 is entirely because Severson played 0 defense and allows a man backdoor 1 v 0 on his side of the ice. Little chance for Cory.
Goal 3 is high short side. That's on the goalie. Goals that go in on the short side? Of course there are exceptions, but he left the whole short side open. I would argue that was worse than goal 1, because there was a screen on goal 1.
Let me ask you this and PLEASE REPLY BACK! Because you've ignored it EVERY time I've used these numbers. Schneider is a .905% goalie over his last 100 starts. That includes the playoffs too. It would be less if I took those out of the sample and THAT would be a bias. It's probably .902% or .903% regular season only, but I'm being fair here.
So, .905% over 100 games, isn't it a possibility that he just sucks now? And just isn't good anymore? Because if your favorite goalie across the river (who I KNOOOOW you LOVE!) had a .905% over his last two years, you'd be laughing at him, saying he was finished and that he needed more pads. But we live in a world where that's not happening. Where Cory Schneider might go extinct before not only Lundqvist, but before Roberto Luongo. Find me a list of ACTIVE goalies that are .905% over their last 100 games. I'll be waiting. I bet you can't find many active. I don't even know if Cam Ward has been that bad.