Better Call Sal
Salnalysis
That production level is insane lol.
Hamilton is a possession monster. Possession is the most important basic skill in hockey. He's gonna get beat on the occasional misplayed 2 on 1. But there's a lot fewer 2 on 1s when he's on the ice than when other guys are.
Complaining about it is like complaining that your Ferrari gets bad gas mileage. It's something you should keep in mind and occasionally work around, but it doesn't make him a non-elite player and doesn't mean he isn't living up to his fat contract.
He’s probably the best possession defenseman of his generationIs there certain possession metrik you are referring to?
I see him as someone that is playing sheltered minutes and still managing to bleed defensively. I mean has he EVER won a foot race? Does he even try to skate back if there is a breakaway?
View attachment 633578
Least d-zone starts, least takeaways and most giveaways. Most penalties taken, least penalties drawn. Least shots blocked.... etc.
Wouldn’t worry about that at all to be honest.Dougie is a bit of a soft defender at times but nothing you didn’t know before we signed him.
I’d worry more about Luke and Nemec developing into well rounded players. We’ve traded and signed our way into competent defenders. Remains to be seen if we can develop one.
I wonder if he had the nickname ''King Richard'' even before that though? He was already in pro hockey for 10 years by then. He was a Nordique for quite a while before he got to Vancouver.I’m m going to guess it is because he put up a .918 sv percentage in 1982 playoffs leading an under .500 Canucks team to the Final. For context that regular season only 1 goalie had a sv pct. above .900. It was also the season Gretzky scored 92 goals and the Canucks avoided the Oilers in the playoffs because the even worse Kings upset them in the Miracle on Manchester.
I don’t think you can win 4 playoff series en route to a cup with three guys who are gamblers, even if they comprise the best offensive D corps. in the league.Wouldn’t worry about that at all to be honest.
They are young and untested. it's a reasonable thought. I expect that their talent level will allow them to succeed but until they are functional in the NHL it will be a question no matter how great they are outside the NHL. I can almost guarantee you that numerous non-Devils fans will post about Luke being terrible or a bust or whatever miserable insult they can think of when he has the typical growing pains.Wouldn’t worry about that at all to be honest.
The best defense is a good offense or something someone said sometime.But technically, that doesn't mean he plays good defense. Those stats can also show the puck is on his (or his linemates's) stick more and they generate more offense zone time and chances vs. goals against. I mean you can infer either way, but we all know he and his line have the puck in ozone more, so yes it generates less goals against, etc, but not because their defense is good, but more because their offense/pressure is so good.
If they want to infer that is defense, i guess yes, but that is not really touting he defensively is best in league by defensive play.
I'd say Hughes a better forechecker than Bratt... and hounds better...
(Oh and don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Bratt is BAD at defense, I just find that interpretation of that meaning he is best defensive forward very misleading)
Presumably he and Tatar would form 2/3 of the league's most dominant line.if haula is so good at propping up his linemates, put him with someone who needs the help. jack doesn’t
I recall Richard, he was called "King Richard" if memory serves.
My wife disagrees. According to her I’m never correct. To be fair the dogs agree with her.your memory is correct
So do we keep together Mercer - Boq - Mcleod together (whomever was the center)
Was that them getting lucky, or was that actual chemistry... ?