Devils Draft Review

ForeverJerseyGirl

Registered User
Dec 14, 2014
11,854
35
New Jersey
I certainly hope so! It seems like Shero still firmly believes Bennett can make it in this league and be the top 6 wing he was drafted to be.

Nice to see someone has faith in him to be honest.



Also, you guys are so nice! I'm feeling so welcomed here, which is a huge difference from how another fanbase on here treated me. :)

I agree. It definitely looks like Shero (and Hynes, too, probably) believe that Bennet can still make it in this league and be a top six winger. I think he'll certainly get a good opportunity here, and that he was acquired for a reason. This could be a nice fresh start for him with people who are still familiar with him and have faith in him. I'm sure everyone wants it to work out well.

Glad you feel welcome here. We try our best to be a nice sub forum:)
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,386
24,637
Brooklyn, NY
I think people forgot how much talent Zacha has and how much it started to show in his season this year. He definitely had a few hiccups around when he got hurt, but he hit fire to finish the season off and in the playoffs.

JQ and Speers also had solid offensive seasons as well.

Could always use more but as you said, so could basically every team, but we aren't without it.

Plus you are right we are on the way to becoming a big, fast, tough team to play against and that by itself will lead to more wins.

We are accumulating the pieces to make us a playoff regular again.

I hope we succeeded in turning that guy's frown upside-down.
 

Crosby87Domi11

Registered User
Jan 29, 2013
522
1
Locust Grove,VA
I agree. It definitely looks like Shero (and Hynes, too, probably) believe that Bennet can still make it in this league and be a top six winger. I think he'll certainly get a good opportunity here, and that he was acquired for a reason. This could be a nice fresh start for him with people who are still familiar with him and have faith in him. I'm sure everyone wants it to work out well.

Glad you feel welcome here. We try our best to be a nice sub forum:)

I'm just hoping this will be good for him. Both playing-wise and mentally. I fully believe Pittsburgh kinda screwed his development (when he was healthy and could play) by either demoting him from Crosby or Malkins line for one bad game, or pulling him from the lineup completely.


I don't know as if it *did* hurt his development, since he hasnt played much anyway, but I doubt it helped.

Not to mention most Penguins fans were pretty horrible with the injury jokes and things of that nature.


But yeah, so far this group seems really friendly. (hopefully it doesn't change o.o)
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,386
24,637
Brooklyn, NY
Sorry, this makes no sense. If the Devils were the only team drafting this weekend I would agree with you, but everyone got better this weekend simply because everyone added players and subtracted nothing. If you scan "Draft Grades" by "experts" the Devils were in no way, shape or form considered to have one of the better drafts in the league. At BEST middle of the pack, at worst - worse than that. So, how can you argue that they are moving closer to the playoffs? What are they doing to gain ground on the current playoff teams and move faster than the other non-playoff teams in the "race to the eight"? I see nothing this weekend certainly. What are you seeing. Again, that they are doing BETTER than the others. Because you can't just look at them, what are they doing relative to who they are competing against?

I thought I WAS the experts.

Oh well, back to the drawing board...

If you guys want, I can draft grade the Metropolitan, but for now real quickly I'll rank us against "the competition".

1. Philadelphia: I hate to say this, but Hextall is aces on draft day. Their second round haul was magnificent.
2. New Jersey: see the column at the top of this thread.
3. Carolina: Loved Kuokkanen in 2nd, but both first rounders have tons of red flags and late rounds were shaky
4. Islanders: 6 picks, 5 LWs is funny, but 4 of those LWs have serious upside and Bellows = star
5. Washington: solid across the board, but not very sexy
6. Rangers: swung for the fences admirably late, but no picks until 3rd and no sure things
7. Pittsburgh: more than any team, should've drafted Bitten/Abramov with two late 2nd rounders
 

Emperoreddy

Show Me What You Got!
Apr 13, 2010
130,431
75,974
New Jersey, Exit 16E
I thought I WAS the experts.

Oh well, back to the drawing board...

If you guys want, I can draft grade the Metropolitan, but for now real quickly I'll rank us against "the competition".

1. Philadelphia: I hate to say this, but Hextall is aces on draft day. Their second round haul was magnificent.
2. New Jersey: see the column at the top of this thread.
3. Carolina: Loved Kuokkanen in 2nd, but both first rounders have tons of red flags and late rounds were shaky
4. Islanders: 6 picks, 5 LWs is funny, but 4 of those LWs have serious upside and Bellows = star
5. Washington: solid across the board, but not very sexy
6. Rangers: swung for the fences admirably late, but no picks until 3rd and no sure things
7. Pittsburgh: more than any team, should've drafted Bitten/Abramov with two late 2nd rounders

I've gotten the impression that a lot of people liked our draft. Not in the top 3 (Arizona seems to be the consensus best draft), but still very good.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,386
24,637
Brooklyn, NY
This was thought to be a shallow draft.

Does that explain, in part, going Euro 3 times later in the draft?

How off the radar were these guys?

This was not a shallow draft, just top heavy. It was shallow compared to last year, which was exceptionally deep. Next year is a shallow draft, unfortunately. Weak at the top, as well. Nolan Patrick will go #1 and he's outstanding, but not generational like Matthews/Laine this year or McDavid/Eichel last year.
 

Eric Sachs

Registered User
Jan 31, 2007
18,643
1
You have to factor in #77 also

It was Brown and Connor Hall(#77) for McLeod and Bennett.

Not really considering that drafting Brown at 11 would not have generated the extra 3rd. The difference of 3 spots is fairly negligible in the 3rd round.

the options were:

1) Brown at 11OA
2) McLeod at 12OA + use extra pick for Bennett
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,386
24,637
Brooklyn, NY
I agree. It definitely looks like Shero (and Hynes, too, probably) believe that Bennet can still make it in this league and be a top six winger. I think he'll certainly get a good opportunity here, and that he was acquired for a reason. This could be a nice fresh start for him with people who are still familiar with him and have faith in him. I'm sure everyone wants it to work out well.

Glad you feel welcome here. We try our best to be a nice sub forum:)

Winnipeg has the nicest forums, but it's because they're trapped in by snow this time of June and don't get to actually speak with other human beings in person.
 

Crosby87Domi11

Registered User
Jan 29, 2013
522
1
Locust Grove,VA
Winnipeg has the nicest forums, but it's because they're trapped in by snow this time of June and don't get to actually speak with other human beings in person.

Lmao.

But really, Winnipeg is super nice too. I was in their fandom for a little while for another player (who doesnt play in the NHL anymore) and they welcomed me right in.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,386
24,637
Brooklyn, NY
I've gotten the impression that a lot of people liked our draft. Not in the top 3 (Arizona seems to be the consensus best draft), but still very good.

I'll rank the drafts differently.

1)Winnipeg: Laine is a future 50+ goal scorer, he's ridiculous. Stanley, Green & Cederholm are all very, very good D prospects added to a team which already has the best collection of F prospects in the NHL. Did they give up too much to move up for Stanley who still would have been there at #22 like everyone is saying? Yes. But Arizona gave up too much to move up 4 spots to get Chychrun, too.

2)Toronto: like many pundits, I had a problem with their later round picks. However, any draft where you get an Auston Matthews, you need to add him to the equation.

3)Calgary: Tkachuk falling to them at #6 was HUGE. Adam Fox at #66? He's basically a right-shooting version of Jake Bean who went #13 (Carolina), just an exceptional offensive defenseman. Parsons is a top 5 G in this draft. And a plethora of nice upside picks late: Lindstrom, Mattson, Tuulola.

4)Edmonton: This team wins the lottery even when they don't win the lottery. Puljujarvi falling to #4? Benson falling to #32? Sick. They made nice later picks with talented Finns Niemelainen and Rasanen.

5)Philadelphia: Dropping down from #18 to #22 and then getting the guy you wanted at #18 in Rubtsov is genius. In the second round they got the best G in the draft (Hart), and two RWs with first-line upside (Laberge, Allison). Just a brilliant job by Hextall.

6) TIE: Montreal/Arizona: very similar drafts. Sergachev is as superior to Chychrun as Keller is superior to Bitten. With their smallish offensive defensemen, I like Dineen better than Mete, but still give them a tie because it also needs to be factored in that Arizona was fleeced by Detroit in their desperation to get Chychrun, who is not considerably better than the guy Nashville picked next, Dante Fabbro.
 

AfroThunder396

[citation needed]
Jan 8, 2006
39,130
23,187
Miami, FL
Buffalo had a nice draft too. Nylander, Asplund, and Pu in the first two rounds is a nice haul but I thought they had a weak late draft.

I think ours was certainly top-10.
 

ForeverJerseyGirl

Registered User
Dec 14, 2014
11,854
35
New Jersey
I'm just hoping this will be good for him. Both playing-wise and mentally. I fully believe Pittsburgh kinda screwed his development (when he was healthy and could play) by either demoting him from Crosby or Malkins line for one bad game, or pulling him from the lineup completely.


I don't know as if it *did* hurt his development, since he hasnt played much anyway, but I doubt it helped.

Not to mention most Penguins fans were pretty horrible with the injury jokes and things of that nature.


But yeah, so far this group seems really friendly. (hopefully it doesn't change o.o)

One of the positives about Hynes' coaching is he doesn't tend to pull players from the lineup for just one bad game, so Bennett shouldn't have that hanging over his head.

For the most part, Devils fans are supportive, and there's not a lot of media pressure, so I think mentally the Devils are a pretty easy organization to play for. There are going to be some loony fans (like the ones that berate Cory every time he lets in a goal) but there are sadly going to be bad apples in every fan base. We just have to try to keep the bad apples from making the rest of the fans rotten.
 

Crosby87Domi11

Registered User
Jan 29, 2013
522
1
Locust Grove,VA
One of the positives about Hynes' coaching is he doesn't tend to pull players from the lineup for just one bad game, so Bennett shouldn't have that hanging over his head.

For the most part, Devils fans are supportive, and there's not a lot of media pressure, so I think mentally the Devils are a pretty easy organization to play for. There are going to be some loony fans (like the ones that berate Cory every time he lets in a goal) but there are sadly going to be bad apples in every fan base. We just have to try to keep the bad apples from making the rest of the fans rotten.


Yeah, and as far as I remember he played well under Hynes in the AHL. I think the fact that he already knows Hynes and Shero is only going to make the transition easier.

On a side note: it's stupid to get all pissed off with a goalie for allowing a goal, there are *usually* 5 players in front of him who should be helping to keep the puck away from him. If it's a really bad goal, then maybe place the blame but for *every* goal, it's beyond overkill and it's ridiculous.

I've ran into my share of 'bad apples' in various teams fanbases but luckily they're usually few and far between.
 

devilsblood

Registered User
Mar 10, 2010
29,544
11,813
So do we think we've stocked the fwd pool yet? At least to the point where we are no longer going into the draft demanding fwd's?

I thought we had made great strides since last off season, and now add 5 more decent to real good prospects up front.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,386
24,637
Brooklyn, NY
So do we think we've stocked the fwd pool yet? At least to the point where we are no longer going into the draft demanding fwd's?

I thought we had made great strides since last off season, and now add 5 more decent to real good prospects up front.

Well, the Devils are not winning the Stanley Cup this year, so there is still some ways to go in terms of beefing up the talent base. But Shero should always draft the best available player. Here's how I'd rank every position now, with 2016 picks in bold.

G
1. Blackwood
2. Wedgewood
3. Cormier

LD
1. Rykov
2. White
3. Davies

RD
1. Santini
2. Jacobs
3. Mozik

LW
1. Blandisi
2. Boucher
3. Maltsev
4. Wood
5. Seney

RW
1. Anderson
2. Bastian
3. Speers

C
1. Zacha
2. McLeod
3. Quenneville
4. Gignac
5. Coleman

As you can see, Devils had something between diddly and squat at RW prior to the draft weekend. We still don't have the firepower there of Winnipeg (Laine, Dano, Spacek) or Toronto (Marner, Nylander, Bracco, Kappanen), but we now have two guys that project as very good, fast & physical two way options for the second or third lines.

NJ also had nothing at LHD, but Rykov was an outstanding late grab -- at the very least he should be a solid bottom-4 guy. Davies was a nice risk to take in the 7th.

NJ were already strong at RHD, Santini in particular is one of the most underrated prospects in the NHL. He is an absolute shut-down beast in his own end, and will never score 40+ but he moves the puck well and skates terrifically. Jacobs also looks like some solid depth on the backline.

NJ center prospects now have to rank among the top in the NHL.

I would like the Devils to pick up another top 6 LW and top 4 LHD. There are options that have been unreported in major media outlets. Florida's new stat-based regime devalues a high-caliber prospect like LW Lawson Crouse, their 2015 1st round pick. I would definitely kick the tires on that. Would Columbus include 6'5 LW Paul Bittner in a deal to take Scott Hartnell off their hands? I would assume so, given their current predicament.

NJ still needs a high end, offensive LHD, and I expect that to be addressed in the 2017 draft. Scouting Mississauga for McLeod and Bastian, the Devils were surely impressed with 6'6 Nick Hague, a 2017 eligible who is not only humongous but also skates and moves the puck extremely well. Although I never want to type his name again, Urho Vaakanainen is a LHD who oozes offensive upside, also eligible in 2017. My personal favorite LHD for 2017 is US-NTDP Max Gildon (played with our own Joey Anderson), a kid who reminds me a lot of a young Ryan McDonagh.

Again, time will tell.
 

tailfins

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 20, 2005
2,612
1,476
I like the draft analysis, but I think trades should be included. When those are factored in, Arizona's draft is that much better after picking up DeAngelo. I think Carolina shots up as well after picking up TT for a 2nd this year (deBrincat) and a 3rd in a shallow draft next year.
 

elindholm

Registered User
Jun 3, 2013
151
0
Okay, so a lot of Devils fans were tweaked that Shero did not come away from the first round with a Keller or Jost or Nylander or Sergachev, but that's the price of not tanking. It would be nice to get a top line scoring superstar to pair with Zacha, sure, but the more I look at the Devils draft the more I like it.

1 (12) C Michael McLeod
Ray Shero deserves some credit here. After the four players the Devils coveted went off consecutively in picks 7-10, he pulled a fast one to get a free third round pick, convincing Ottawa that either NJ or Carolina wanted Logan Brown, who the Senators really, really wanted. So, Devils ran away with the #80 pick and moved down to #12.

McLeod has taken some slack for his inability to ever compete for the Art Ross Trophy, but hey -- all the best scorers went where they should have... in the top 10. And what does McLeod bring? Foremost, he is the best skater in the entire draft. Anyone who does not realize what that kind of speed can do was not watching the past Stanley Cup Playoffs. With all the talk of Crosby and Malkin, the main force in the Penguins' championship run was that no defense could skate with the trio of Bonino-Kessel-Hagelin.

Folks, McLeod is that kind of fast. Every time he hits the open ice with the puck it's like he swallowed a twin-carbine engine and got hit in the butt by a lightning bolt. He's like the Delorean in Back To The Future, for crying out loud. In addition to that, he plays two ways, he's a character guy, he's an unbelievable penalty killer, he's a demon in the face off circle. All of these qualities are qualities the Devils have lacked for several seasons. NJ has been a slow team, a small team, awful in the face off circle.

Let's get behind McLeod -- he's a player. There's a lot of Dylan Larkin in his game, he adds several needed elements to the Devils, and he should be a major part of NJ's future success.

2 (41) RW Nathan Bastian
I must admit, I was really hoping for a high-upside offensive F like Abramov or Bitten with this pick, and instead we took McLeod's linemate from Mississauga/best friend. But again, the more I think about the pick the more I like it.

Since Kovalchuk split back to the land of Nabokov and borscht, how many 6'4 power forwards who can skate and shoot have the Devils had? The number you're thinking of is exactly the same as the amount of one night trysts you've had with Madonna. (Not me, you. Those numbers are different.) Bastian has a sky high hockey IQ, and although he will never be confused with Datsyuk with his on-ice vision, he is a very adept passer. He plays two-ways and has an excellent shot. He bangs in the corners, wins board battles, and wins net-mouth scrums to bang rebounds home.

Again, Bastian is the type of player the Devils have lacked and sorely need. Will he ever score 50 goals? No, but he has the upside of a very formidable, two-way, physical second-line power F. A gamer.

3 (73) RW Joey Anderson
This pick did not have to grow on me -- I loved it right away. Anderson was overlooked due to the fact that his line mates on the US-NTDP were first-round studs Clayton Keller and Kieffer Bellows, but Anderson was no small part of that line's success.

Anderson is an outstanding skater with a non-stop motor. Despite modest size of 5'11-190, he plays a power F game, hustling like a demon, afraid of nothing, a beast in the crease and the corners. He does all the little things it takes to win, is smart as hell, very well coached and conditioned. He's basically a teenage version of Ryan Callahan. Like McLeod and Bastian he has a very high floor, meaning that even if his scoring does not develop enough to translate to a scoring line role, he will be invaluable in the NHL as a checker with speed and guts.

3 (76) TRADED FOR RW BEAU BENNETT
I know, I know -- what kind of idiotic hockey team would trade an early round pick for a talented but injury prone former first round pick who was labeled a bust in their early 20's?

Oh, we're talking about Beau Bennett? I thought we were talking about Kyle Palmieri.

Now, I'm not saying Bennett will be as good as Palmieri, but I will say he's certainly worth a third-round pick in a draft where you have three of them. Bennett can skate, is extremely creative with the puck and has a sneaky-good shot. Sure, there's a lot of IFS here; IF he's healthy, IF he clicks with the Devils' system on the second line. But let's just say those IFS work out this year... we could have 50+ point RWs on both the first and second lines for the cost of three non-first round picks. That's a chance Devils fans should be willing to take.

3 (80) C/LW Brandon Gignac
Another pick I loved right away. One of the best draft writers in the biz is Steve Kournianos (The Draft Analyst), and he loves this kid. Signac oozes skill, can skate like the wind and plays a responsible two-way game. Sense a pattern here? He is terrific in the face-off circle and has a high compete level. Sense a pattern here?

If the 61 points in 67 games does not impress you, keep in mind he was playing on the second line behind 2015 Islanders 1st round pick Anthony Beauvillier. Gignac got most of the secondary assignments and still managed a point per game in the QMJHL. He's just a tremendous passer and stickhandler, and many scouts think he has even greater offensive upside if moved to the wing. I think he's similar in many ways to Blake Speers, whom the Devils grabbed in the third round in 2015, a real upside pick.

4 (102) LW Mikhail Maltsev
Another pick I loved right away. What do you say to a 6'3-200+ LW with top notch skating, dazzling puck skills and a penchant for hard-nosed, two-way play? You say you'll take him on your team.

Maltsev was one of those kids who would have gone much higher if not for an injury prone draft year. In that sense, he is reminiscent of Christian Dvorak or a guy Devils fans might recall in Petr Sykora. The skill set is there, the smarts and motor are there. We're talking yet another forward with top-6 potential.

LATE PICKS
A few fans bummed out when the Devils announced a 4th-round selection of Saginaw goaltender Evan Cormier. Though projecting 18 year old goalies is even harder than trying to remember what I did last night, he's got NHL size and athleticism and a wicked glove hand. His positioning looks a bit wonky and he flails a bit in traffic, but those are coachable deficiencies.

Tough not to rave about 5th round LHD Yegor Rykov. Ideal size at 6'1-205, skates well, calm with the puck, very good in his own zone. He looked terrific at the world tourney and there's no reason to think he cannot be a rock solid second-pairing defenseman at the NHL level -- a tremendous bargain for a 5th round pick.

Jesper Bratt was a big-time dice roll, real boom/bust type. His skill with the puck is electrifying, his play without the puck is just atrocious. He's small at 5'9-170, but he can make plays at high speed and has a very hard, accurate shot for such a small kid. Like fellow Swede Mattias Tedenby, he's going to need to make it on a scoring line if he will make the NHL at all, hence the "bust" in boom/bust. But the boom? He can be a real Tyler Ennis-type undersized scoring threat. Certainly worth a 6th round gamble.

I can't even find film on Devils' 7th rounder Jeremy Davies. Admittedly, I really really wanted David Quenneville here, but I'm not going to complain about an offensive-minded LHD who led all USHL rearguards in scoring this season for Bloomington. Let's hope he develops into a Brian Campbell-type at Northeastern over the next few years.

CONCLUSION
Look, does the Devils draft rank with Toronto or Winnipeg? No, but they drafted first and second overall. NJ drafted 11th and just missed out on the four scorers they coveted. No use shouting to the heavens about that.

Instead, enjoy a very promising group of new Devils prospects. It can be argued that the Devils had a better draft than Columbus, who drafted third. Better than Carolina and Boston, who each had a pair of first-rounders.

The Devils still need a top-end young scoring winger to pair with Zacha for the foreseeable future. Maybe the Devils will trade for one in the future, or draft one next year. Maybe an idiot GM like Benning in Vancouver or the math geeks in Florida offer NJ Virtanen or Crouse for something expendable. But the fact remains that a team with little organizational depth at forward last week now has substantial organizational depth at forward, and that's something to smile about.

It is clear to me that Shero and Castron and co. have a vision and they are executing that vision with patience and precision. It is extremely conceivable that names like McLeod, Bastian and Anderson will be part of that vision for many improved seasons to come in the future.

Well done, thanks for the hard you put into this
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,386
24,637
Brooklyn, NY
I like the draft analysis, but I think trades should be included. When those are factored in, Arizona's draft is that much better after picking up DeAngelo. I think Carolina shots up as well after picking up TT for a 2nd this year (deBrincat) and a 3rd in a shallow draft next year.

You know, that's a good point I did not consider.

So I will rank Arizona over Montreal due to your astute remark.

I will say that DeBrincat is, to me, a superior prospect to Teravainen. I just love the kid, imagine Brendan Gallagher with even more offense. People say 5'7 this and 5'7 that, but pound for pound he's one of the toughest kids in this draft, really throws the body around and backs down to nothing.

As far as pure offense? I would say he's equivalent to Nylander. His puck skills/skating/shooting are really that good.

But agreed Teravainen is a good value for Carolina. I had some problems with Carolina's draft, however, that I did not have with NJ.

1)Carolina's best two prospects are LHD; Hanifin and Fleury. As good as Bean is, why draft him at #13 with the dynamic scoring Fs you need available like Bellows or Kunin? I think Bean has the upside to become a 50+ point guy at the NHL level. But that would still put him behind Hanifin on the depth chart. And he's got a lot of concerns about his two-way play. I believe in BOP to some degree, but did anyone think Bean was that much superior to Bellows or Kunin?

2)I have a ton of concerns with Gauthier. He's got a tantalizing combo of size/strength/skates/shot, but he's kind of a one-trick pony. He bodies off smaller D and barrels to the crease or shooting areas for all of his goals. And all of his points are goals... he had a very strange stat line of 41 goals and 16 assists in his draft year. Essentially, his entire offensive repertoire will not work in the NHL against stronger defensemen. To me, he's got a lot of Ifs for a first-round pick. Watch film of Gauthier and then a very similar talent in Philadelphia second-rounder Wade Allison, then tell me who looks like the better prospect to you.

3)Janne Kuokkanen in the second round was, in my eyes, one of the best picks in the entire draft. Basically a far better version, in every aspect, than Henrik Borgstrom whom the Florida Panthers took over 20 picks earlier in the first round.

4)In later rounds I felt Carolina drafted essentially a project goaltender (as did the Devils) in Lafontaine and then mostly went for checking line forwards (Filipe, Elnyuk, Zimmer).

So even adding Teravainen to their draft haul, I'm going to keep them at #3 in the Metro behind the Devils.
 

thethinglonger

Castron & Crew
Dec 1, 2014
3,771
2,750
New Jersey
One thing that I really like about the Gignac pick, as Steve mentioned in the OP, Gignac was mostly on the 2nd or 3rd line this season for a loaded Shawinigan team. However, during the World Juniors (and Anthony Beauvillier was representing Team Canada), Gignac found himself playing on the top line for Shawinigan. In 9 games he scored 14 points...huge potential for a breakout season next year.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,386
24,637
Brooklyn, NY
One thing that I really like about the Gignac pick, as Steve mentioned in the OP, Gignac was mostly on the 2nd or 3rd line this season for a loaded Shawinigan team. However, during the World Juniors (and Anthony Beauvillier was representing Team Canada), Gignac found himself playing on the top line for Shawinigan. In 9 games he scored 14 points...huge potential for a breakout season next year.

Bingo.

Everyone was saying this with Cliff Pu (whom I also like, also taken in 3rd round) with London, but Gignac was even better in a 2nd-line role. This was a very, very good pick, folks.
 

Ripshot 43

Registered User
Jul 21, 2010
13,778
10,545
Well, the Devils are not winning the Stanley Cup this year, so there is still some ways to go in terms of beefing up the talent base. But Shero should always draft the best available player. Here's how I'd rank every position now, with 2016 picks in bold.

G
1. Blackwood
2. Wedgewood
3. Cormier

LD
1. Rykov
2. White
3. Davies

RD
1. Santini
2. Jacobs
3. Mozik

LW
1. Blandisi
2. Boucher
3. Maltsev
4. Wood
5. Seney

RW
1. Anderson
2. Bastian
3. Speers

C
1. Zacha
2. McLeod
3. Quenneville
4. Gignac
5. Coleman

As you can see, Devils had something between diddly and squat at RW prior to the draft weekend. We still don't have the firepower there of Winnipeg (Laine, Dano, Spacek) or Toronto (Marner, Nylander, Bracco, Kappanen), but we now have two guys that project as very good, fast & physical two way options for the second or third lines.

NJ also had nothing at LHD, but Rykov was an outstanding late grab -- at the very least he should be a solid bottom-4 guy. Davies was a nice risk to take in the 7th.

NJ were already strong at RHD, Santini in particular is one of the most underrated prospects in the NHL. He is an absolute shut-down beast in his own end, and will never score 40+ but he moves the puck well and skates terrifically. Jacobs also looks like some solid depth on the backline.

NJ center prospects now have to rank among the top in the NHL.

I would like the Devils to pick up another top 6 LW and top 4 LHD. There are options that have been unreported in major media outlets. Florida's new stat-based regime devalues a high-caliber prospect like LW Lawson Crouse, their 2015 1st round pick. I would definitely kick the tires on that. Would Columbus include 6'5 LW Paul Bittner in a deal to take Scott Hartnell off their hands? I would assume so, given their current predicament.

NJ still needs a high end, offensive LHD, and I expect that to be addressed in the 2017 draft. Scouting Mississauga for McLeod and Bastian, the Devils were surely impressed with 6'6 Nick Hague, a 2017 eligible who is not only humongous but also skates and moves the puck extremely well. Although I never want to type his name again, Urho Vaakanainen is a LHD who oozes offensive upside, also eligible in 2017. My personal favorite LHD for 2017 is US-NTDP Max Gildon (played with our own Joey Anderson), a kid who reminds me a lot of a young Ryan McDonagh.

Again, time will tell.

Again Steve... This write up is just awesome. Now, while all don't need to take your word as gospel, I do know that you follow these things a lot more closely than me. This is great information and thank you for sharing it with all of us.

Seeing you out quite a few of the newly drafted players above some "bigger" names for us previously on the depth chart... Is this more of a positive thing for the new guys or just shows how bad our depth really was? Specifically talking about Quennville and Wood respectively.
 
Last edited:

Ripshot 43

Registered User
Jul 21, 2010
13,778
10,545
Also, surprised to see Blandisi above Boucher and Anderson (drafted later) above Bastian.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,386
24,637
Brooklyn, NY
Again Steve... This write up is just awesome. Now, while all don't need to take your word as gospel, I do know that you follow these things a lot more closely than me. This is great information and thank you for sharing it with all of us.

Seeing you out quite a few of the newly drafted players above some "bigger" names for us previously on the depth chart... Is this more of a positive thing for the new guys or just shows how bad our depth really was? Specifically talking about Quennville and Wood respectively.

It's all speculation. I think Bastian and Anderson are very close. I like them both a lot. Neither have any bust potential -- their skating/2-way/hockey IQ/character combos will guarantee they are effective bottom-6 types even if their scoring does not come around.

I'm not knocking Wood, I think he's a very good third-line guy for the foreseeable future. But I feel strongly that Maltsev has the talent to be at the top of the LW list by the end of next year.

Quenneville is a prospect I love. McLeod is a prospect I love more. But Quenneville makes the team in 2016-17, in my opinion. He was terrific down the stretch for the Wheat Kings.

Thanks for your complimentary words by the way. I'm probably going to leave these boards in awhile to work on other writing projects, but I can always put something together on here if you have specific things you want me to analyze/discuss: I can be found at @StIves72
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad