If Anaheim is a bottom 5 team by the trade deadline, maybe we could get Fowler or lindholm from them.I think the 2020 1st round pick should be in play for a top pairing LHD.
If Anaheim is a bottom 5 team by the trade deadline, maybe we could get Fowler or lindholm from them.
Unless you’re talking about the shootout then I don’t agree.This is wrong but yeah. Stafford had a role here and was actually good in it.
I would trade the house for Hampus Lindholm.
I just hope he can be half of what the main board tells me Lafreniere will be.
He's not THAT small.I just hope he can be half of what the main board tells me Lafreniere will be.
But 2 guys who have never played a day on North American ice nevermind the NHL should be automatically slotted in? Or maybe the guy who just put up a whopping 30 points (3 in his final 17)?With the players we have signed, Zacha should not be in the top 6. No way.
But 2 guys who have never played a day on North American ice nevermind the NHL should be automatically slotted in? Or maybe the guy who just put up a whopping 30 points (3 in his final 17)?
Zacha had a fantastic final 1/3 of the season and has already handled 2nd line duties at this level.
He starts on Hughes 'wing' unless the goose looks like freakin Kucherov in camp. Even then you consider dropping Bratt down the lineup and giving Pavel a shot. Unless you just want to completely concede faceoffs and a fair amount of D on that line.
It just doesn't make sense unless 2 of 3 things happen - he looks lost out there, goose comes STORMING out of the gate, and/or Jack magically figures out this offseason how to win a faceoff against NHL'ers.
We should all be excited, but for sound reasons.
The most overrated skill in the league. You don't need to be great at draws to be a great center. Kuznetsov just had 38%. Zacha had a good 1/3rd of a season but that's literally it. He was never able to produce before that. He should be on the outside looking in for a spot and gets bumped up if he looks better than any of our 6 best forwards which isn't likely. Put him on the 3rd line with Zajac and Boqvist
I disagree.I don’t think that Zacha is going to start on the top six to start the season, but if he has a stellar preseason, he might grab a spot there. Hynes tends to keep things wide open.
if zacha is in our top 6, something went horribly wrong with the plan, or someone got injured or died of dysentery or something
He didn't fail by any metric after mid-Jan or so last year all the while playing with a rotating gong show of linemates.Yes, the two guys who have the potential should get the spot ahead of the guy who has had the opportunity and failed.
Deletewhile Zacha’s Final Third would make a great username, it’s getting a little nutty how often it’s referenced. what did he have, 3 even strength goals in his last 25 games? that’s what we’re talking about?
if zacha is in our top 6, something went horribly wrong with the plan, or someone got injured or died of dysentery or something
if zacha is in our top 6, something went horribly wrong with the plan, or someone got injured or died of dysentery or something
Agreed, he probably won't become an offensive powerhouse but he still has another 2 seasons of growth and improvement ahead. I don't see why he can't be a steady player on our roster for years to come. Yes he's a disappointment due to his draft position but the way his career is going, he won't be a bust.the idea that because a player was less impressive in his age 20 and 21 seasons means he can’t ever be an impact player is dumb as hell. he has tools and hopefully he’ll put it together but his role and his career isn’t set in stone at this point