Devils 2019-20 offseason team discussion (news and notes)

Status
Not open for further replies.

PizzaAndPucks

New Jersey Angels diehard
Nov 29, 2018
2,765
4,256
I'm not interested in moving our 2020 1st round pick at all. We have no 2nd and no 3rd next year. We had a bunch of picks this year but aside from Hughes it was a decent draft (so far) but nothing crazy. Hipefully next years lick is used on another D man or a big time goal scorer.
 

Bleedred

Travis Green BLOWS! Bring back Nasreddine!
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
130,277
57,712
This is wrong but yeah. Stafford had a role here and was actually good in it.
Unless you’re talking about the shootout then I don’t agree.

He was useless after November of 2017. He was no value after that during in-game situations unless we’re comparing him to Kevin Rooney or one of those scab call ups.
 

aboriginal

lou ****ing sucks
Mar 10, 2006
24,809
1,296
LV-426
I would trade the house for Hampus Lindholm.

Hamp?
Us?

Hampus!

giphy.gif
 

Jack Be Quick

Hasek Is Right
Mar 17, 2011
4,785
3,162
Brooklyn
With the players we have signed, Zacha should not be in the top 6. No way.
But 2 guys who have never played a day on North American ice nevermind the NHL should be automatically slotted in? Or maybe the guy who just put up a whopping 30 points (3 in his final 17)?

Zacha had a fantastic final 1/3 of the season and has already handled 2nd line duties at this level.

He starts on Hughes 'wing' unless the goose looks like freakin Kucherov in camp. Even then you consider dropping Bratt down the lineup and giving Pavel a shot. Unless you just want to completely concede faceoffs and a fair amount of D on that line.

It just doesn't make sense unless 2 of 3 things happen - he looks lost out there, goose comes STORMING out of the gate, and/or Jack magically figures out this offseason how to win a faceoff against NHL'ers.

We should all be excited, but for sound reasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeedsMonster

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
32,898
32,080
NJ
But 2 guys who have never played a day on North American ice nevermind the NHL should be automatically slotted in? Or maybe the guy who just put up a whopping 30 points (3 in his final 17)?

Zacha had a fantastic final 1/3 of the season and has already handled 2nd line duties at this level.

He starts on Hughes 'wing' unless the goose looks like freakin Kucherov in camp. Even then you consider dropping Bratt down the lineup and giving Pavel a shot. Unless you just want to completely concede faceoffs and a fair amount of D on that line.

It just doesn't make sense unless 2 of 3 things happen - he looks lost out there, goose comes STORMING out of the gate, and/or Jack magically figures out this offseason how to win a faceoff against NHL'ers.

We should all be excited, but for sound reasons.

The most overrated skill in the league. You don't need to be great at draws to be a great center. Kuznetsov just had 38%. Zacha had a good 1/3rd of a season but that's literally it. He was never able to produce before that. He should be on the outside looking in for a spot and gets bumped up if he looks better than any of our 6 best forwards which isn't likely. Put him on the 3rd line with Zajac and Boqvist
 

RangerDoggo

The Devils have a culture of failure
Feb 3, 2016
3,166
2,592
Brooklyn via NJ, like the Nets
I don’t think that Zacha is going to start on the top six to start the season, but if he has a stellar preseason, he might grab a spot there. Hynes tends to keep things wide open.
 

Jack Be Quick

Hasek Is Right
Mar 17, 2011
4,785
3,162
Brooklyn
The most overrated skill in the league. You don't need to be great at draws to be a great center. Kuznetsov just had 38%. Zacha had a good 1/3rd of a season but that's literally it. He was never able to produce before that. He should be on the outside looking in for a spot and gets bumped up if he looks better than any of our 6 best forwards which isn't likely. Put him on the 3rd line with Zajac and Boqvist

You posted by far the biggest outlier in Kuz. Every other star center in the league won more than 45% of their draws besides Mac (43.7) and most were very near 50 or much higher. Zajac might not have a job if not for his ability on the dot, or at least certainly not above the 4th line.

How is a Hughes line going to come in and be as effective as they should be if they're chasing the puck for the first ~15 seconds of ~70% of their shifts?

The last 1/3 of the season on a putrid team for a 22y/o is all that matters because it's the most recent and reasonable enough sample size.

And if faceoff's are borderline useless, what would you call a very high percentage of 27 y/o KHL players who arrive for their first time or 21 y/o 2nd round picks coming over from the SHL having success? Way more often than not, actually useless unfortunately, and not locks for a top 6 role above a dude who has been there.

It's their job to displace him, not the other way around.
 
Last edited:

Jack Be Quick

Hasek Is Right
Mar 17, 2011
4,785
3,162
Brooklyn
I don’t think that Zacha is going to start on the top six to start the season, but if he has a stellar preseason, he might grab a spot there. Hynes tends to keep things wide open.
I disagree.

But at the end of the day I think we can all agree these are good problems to have.

Ahhhh, August on HFBoards.
 

MartyOwns

thank you shero
Apr 1, 2007
24,238
18,103
while Zacha’s Final Third would make a great username, it’s getting a little nutty how often it’s referenced. what did he have, 3 even strength goals in his last 25 games? that’s what we’re talking about?

if zacha is in our top 6, something went horribly wrong with the plan, or someone got injured or died of dysentery or something
 
  • Like
Reactions: JK3

Jack Be Quick

Hasek Is Right
Mar 17, 2011
4,785
3,162
Brooklyn
Yes, the two guys who have the potential should get the spot ahead of the guy who has had the opportunity and failed.
He didn't fail by any metric after mid-Jan or so last year all the while playing with a rotating gong show of linemates.

I get that he's had a disappointing start to his career for a 6th OA. But the guy is 22 and on the upswing.

And potential? What sort of logic is that? If we were talking about a Turcotte, Caulfield, Dach, Cozens, etc, you'd have a point.

But we are talking about 2 guys - 1 of whom is quite old to be making his debut on NA ice - who have done less than Zacha in the NHL. You want them to realize that potential? Give them Travs at center, and beef t*ts Wayne on their right side and go from there.

That's how they should be earning a spot in the regular season and not in August or even September. Same goes for Zacha, prove the last 3rd of '18/'19 wasn't a fluke or down you go if one of the new guys shine.

But October - at minimum - is pretty straight forward other than the 12th and 13th forward spot. Camp is just a formality this season for the top 11.

I will say that no matter where these guys end up it feels nice to have that sentiment going in to a season for the first time in a while.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeedsMonster

Jack Be Quick

Hasek Is Right
Mar 17, 2011
4,785
3,162
Brooklyn
while Zacha’s Final Third would make a great username, it’s getting a little nutty how often it’s referenced. what did he have, 3 even strength goals in his last 25 games? that’s what we’re talking about?

if zacha is in our top 6, something went horribly wrong with the plan, or someone got injured or died of dysentery or something
Delete
 
Last edited:

Call Me Al

Registered User
Aug 28, 2017
5,582
6,959
the idea that because a player was less impressive in his age 20 and 21 seasons means he can’t ever be an impact player is dumb as hell. he has tools and hopefully he’ll put it together but his role and his career isn’t set in stone at this point
 
  • Like
Reactions: nugg and Dialamo

Dialamo

Fire Rogalski Hire Pepe
Jul 7, 2007
10,171
6,370
Montreal, QC, Canada
the idea that because a player was less impressive in his age 20 and 21 seasons means he can’t ever be an impact player is dumb as hell. he has tools and hopefully he’ll put it together but his role and his career isn’t set in stone at this point
Agreed, he probably won't become an offensive powerhouse but he still has another 2 seasons of growth and improvement ahead. I don't see why he can't be a steady player on our roster for years to come. Yes he's a disappointment due to his draft position but the way his career is going, he won't be a bust.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nugg

jkrdevil

UnRegistered User
Apr 24, 2006
42,830
12,716
Miami
Three full seasons in the NHL 24 points, 25 points and 25 points.

No one is saying he can’t develop into a useful NHL player, but the evidence shows he isn’t going to a be a top-6 player on a good team. Based on his career so far what is his ceiling? 35-40 points? And that is if he he makes leaps a strides in development.

That’s a low bar. And one that is low enough that is worth it try out two “unproven” players who the organization I assume projects to clear said bar. Especially one who was more than a point per game player in another professional league.
 

Call Me Al

Registered User
Aug 28, 2017
5,582
6,959
the evidence shows that he is developing slowly and performing less than we’d all hoped but proves nothing about the future
 
  • Like
Reactions: HBK27

RangerDoggo

The Devils have a culture of failure
Feb 3, 2016
3,166
2,592
Brooklyn via NJ, like the Nets
The problem with Zacha, as I’ve said before, is that flashes are all we have to work with. For whatever reason, he is completely incapable of putting it together for an entire season, and I think that isn’t going to change. He is who he is.

Keep comparing him to Couturier all you want, but he doesn’t have the brain to go that trajectory.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad