Sarcasm?
CF% in one game doesn't really mean anything. But in a game where the top paring RHD was 7 CF 32 CA and we're hammering Severson who was 22 CF 23 CA...I mean cmon. He was fine. He made that one awful pass to no one that led to a rush the other way, but he did not have a bad game whatsoever.
You have no business using the term "unsupportable take" lmao. That's all I'll say about that.
Moore had 19 CF and 24 CA. By your standard Moore was fine as well. On the season Severson has a CF% of 49.51% and Moore has a CF% of 48.51%. By what standard are you claiming Moore is horrific compared with Severson?
I actually think Severson is dragging Moore down. Dude is constantly stuck with repairing Severson dumb plays.
Wow, is Severson really under 50% lol. I don't even pay attention to that shitty stat, but I'm not even surprised.
I added more to my post. Again, by what standard are you saying Moore stinks compared with Severson when they have similar numbers in the stat you often use to say Severson is great?
Watching the games makes it clear, he's not remotely close to the same caliber. His skating is his only plus attribute. Of course they'll have similar corsi since they've played the heavy majority of games together, but statistically Moore is worse at virtually all of the things.
I agree. I just don't possibly see where this narrative that Moore is horrific and dragging Severson down comes from. They are clearly not a great fit as a pairing though, but Hynes keeps going to it over and over.
Moore has been put in a position to try and repair Severson errors, which is putting him in a tough spot as he isn't that type of player.
Major redflag on the QOC for Severson.Watching the games makes it clear, he's not remotely close to the same caliber. His skating is his only plus attribute. Of course they'll have similar corsi since they've played the heavy majority of games together, but statistically Moore is worse at virtually all of the things.
"All of the things". This chart doesn't have that many individual statistics, most of them are just variations on the same few stats (points, corsi, on ice goals, time on ice) but analyzed in different ways. Presenting it as a comprehensive analysis is misleading, which isn't even the intention of the tool.Watching the games makes it clear, he's not remotely close to the same caliber. His skating is his only plus attribute. Of course they'll have similar corsi since they've played the heavy majority of games together, but statistically Moore is worse at virtually all of the things.
It’s last updated March 14 so it’s missing few games (where both of them weren’t good so not much will change).
