Eggtimer
Registered User
This for sure .I’d still do Avs 1st round pick at ~28th + Zadorov for 18OA.
I’d love to somehow get Zadorov . Exactly the type of player we need
This for sure .I’d still do Avs 1st round pick at ~28th + Zadorov for 18OA.
Wouldn't a second and some adds work just as well?I’d still do Avs 1st round pick at ~28th + Zadorov for 18OA.
Wouldn't a second and some adds work just as well?
Wouldn't a second and some adds work just as well?
I would do the Dumba proposal and look to move Severson for help on the left side of our blueline (Nurse) or a top #6 forward (Nylander).
We need a shakeup on defence and adding two players that aren’t paper tissue soft while removing one of the wort dman on our team in his own zone would be ideal.
Our second is next year, so that does deflate the value a bit.
If you flip the firsts...I don't know...maybe you can get the same quality vet for 28 that you would get for pick 18. So maybe you pick up Z by dropping down 10 spots, but then are still able to pick up Dunn from St Louis for #28 if we take a cap dump or something. Or maybe Cernak, or Dylan Strome from Chicago or something?
I dunno, I think it still leaves the door open for an interesting move after the fact. If you could take something like pick 18 and turn it into Zadorov and Strome or Zadorov and Dunn, that's pretty amazing.
It sounds nice but Zads value has not been a first even by your fans own account. Rangers have their own problems with cap I don't see them with a guy like Zads, but who knowsNope. Avs don’t need quantity. They need quality. I’d shop Zadorov around if NJ didn’t offer 18th OA (plus Avs 1st). See what the Rangers would offer. And others that need a huge hitter that can skate and gobble up 17 minutes a night.
it NJ doesn’t want him. Let Zadorov drop the hammer on Jack Hughes wearing a Rangers sweater.
Avs could use another upper level prospect like Jarvis or Zary in their farm system.
I said Avs 1st and Zadorov for 18OA. I didn’t say Zadorov for 18OA. Huge difference. A second round pick in 2021 gets you no where in this discussion. Avs trade him to someone else.It sounds nice but Zads value has not been a first even by your fans own account. Rangers have their own problems with cap I don't see them with a guy like Zads, but who knows
If the Rangers are keeping (and paying) DeAngelo then they aren’t likely to trade for a defenseman making +3m unless they find a way dump some dead weight (aka Staal & Smith). With the flat salary cap and a brutal 7.5m salary buyout hit they don’t have much wiggle room and some tough decisions to make.Nope. Avs don’t need quantity. They need quality. I’d shop Zadorov around if NJ didn’t offer 18th OA (plus Avs 1st). See what the Rangers would offer. And others that need a huge hitter that can skate and gobble up 17 minutes a night.
it NJ doesn’t want him. Let Zadorov drop the hammer on Jack Hughes wearing a Rangers sweater.
If the Rangers are keeping (and paying) DeAngelo then they aren’t likely to trade for a defenseman making +3m unless they find a way dump some dead weight (aka Staal & Smith). With the flat salary cap and a brutal 7.5m salary buyout hit they don’t have much wiggle room and some tough decisions to make.
For Johnny Gaudreau? I'll do that.Gaudreau for 18th and 20th.
I just think the cap space in conjunction with the picks would be worth it for us and I don't think he'll re sign here. He wants to be in NJ or PHI I think. We also have lots of wingers now.For Johnny Gaudreau? I'll do that.
Even if Gaudreau doesnt re-sign with NJ, they can recoup a 1st round pick back (minimum) at trade deadline.
Gaudreau for 18th and 20th.
I’d still do Avs 1st round pick at ~28th + Zadorov for 18OA.
Sounds good. After the playoffs we'll send the papers in to the league...hahaI would do that deal in a heartbeat. Like a previous poster mentioned, if he doesn’t want to resign, he’ll get at least the same package we got for Hall.
Gaudreau for 18th and 20th.
The cap space is the real value for us. If rumors are true and Hall wants to be a Flame then I think we need to move on from Gaudreau with no cap coming back.Now this is interesting. I had pushed back against JG proposals in the past because they usually included someone like Bratt, and I wasn't about to include a guy i perceived to be a long term solution for the team into a deal where the compensation was not guaranteed to be a long term solution.
But just giving up the first two round picks is much more interesting because even though I don't have interest in acquiring a guy just to flip him later in 18 mos, the general sentiment is that we would have a really good chance of signing him to a deal giving his location preferences, and the absolute worst case scenario, as someone else mentioned, is that we probably flip him for a first + good prospect as a rental.