Prospect Info: Development Camp ‘23

Blowfish

Count down ...
Jan 13, 2005
22,864
14,916
Southwestern Ontario
Mamouth Kristian Kostadinski He's well schooled on how to defend, doesn't unnecessarily chase, knows where to go, is physical and clears the crease with ease, he was a vacuum cleaner any time they tried to attack his side and his skating became noticeably better from Monday to Friday Casper Nassen w first couple of steps are heavy but he's a powerful skater, big dude with soft hands and a lethal shot,deadly in tight,now the interesting part is where will he play next year,he doesn't start College till 2024,hopefully ends up in North America sooner than later
SE good stuff as usual. I especially enjoyed reading about the Mamouth and Casper the friendly ghost.Curious to hear how other's see SE's take regarding these 2 players. This is the first time seeing Casper's name in any of the shared observations.Two 7th rounders who had impressive camps. Finger's crossed they continue to develop into pros.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PepeBostones

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,031
33,883
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
Excellent info

He attacked this camp right from the beginning

He gives the vibe I don’t want to go back

Bruins prospect pool is maligned but they don’t need 4 centers that can play on the top two lines - one will suffice and he looks it.

Side note - Locmelis looked even smaller or lighter than Poitras so the NCAA should be a good place for him - he’s clearly got hockey sense he needs what Merkulov does

My Providence source says Merkulov is strong and significantly more filled out then Lysell - merkulov & Lohrei came from one of the best training programs around at OSU
As you know Dan, because we think a lot alike in many ways, it's not all doom and gloom. he "experts" are not high on the Bruins prospect pool. The Bruins do lack the high-end top-10 pick for obvious reasons. But it takes all kinds of players to fill out a roster.

If you draft one of the top-3 players available in the 2nd round, or 3rd round, or 4th round and so on, are you not doing something right? It's all about value where you are picking.

Again, lacking that high end player that comes with a top-10 or even top-15 pick, this doesn't look too bad:

Providence roster.PNG
Reserve List.PNG
 

DKH

The Bergeron of HF
Feb 27, 2002
74,295
52,160
SE good stuff as usual. I especially enjoyed reading about the Mamouth and Casper the friendly ghost.

Curious to hear how other's see SE's take regarding these 2 players. This is the first time seeing Casper's name in any of the shared observations.

Two 7th rounders who had impressive camps. Finger's crossed they continue to develop into pros.
They only got 3 picks next year unless they do something DC will be an invitational
 

Blowfish

Count down ...
Jan 13, 2005
22,864
14,916
Southwestern Ontario
As you know Dan, because we think a lot alike in many ways, it's not all doom and gloom. he "experts" are not high on the Bruins prospect pool. The Bruins do lack the high-end top-10 pick for obvious reasons. But it takes all kinds of players to fill out a roster.

If you draft one of the top-3 players available in the 2nd round, or 3rd round, or 4th round and so on, are you not doing something right? It's all about value where you are picking.

Again, lacking that high end player that comes with a top-10 or even top-15 pick, this doesn't look too bad:

View attachment 727164View attachment 727165
I'm sure it's posted somewhere however why haven't the blue guys filed for arbitration? Showing my ignorance here lol.
 

DKH

The Bergeron of HF
Feb 27, 2002
74,295
52,160
As you know Dan, because we think a lot alike in many ways, it's not all doom and gloom. he "experts" are not high on the Bruins prospect pool. The Bruins do lack the high-end top-10 pick for obvious reasons. But it takes all kinds of players to fill out a roster.

If you draft one of the top-3 players available in the 2nd round, or 3rd round, or 4th round and so on, are you not doing something right? It's all about value where you are picking.

Again, lacking that high end player that comes with a top-10 or even top-15 pick, this doesn't look too bad:

View attachment 727164View attachment 727165
I was sitting with some folks during week and one made a comment to me ‘I’ve learned from Bruins fans that the regular season doesn’t matter, Development Camp is a love fest over players that will never make it, and if you don’t win the Stanley Cup you or soft and a choker - not one but both.’

I couldn’t have said it better

However I do believe Lysell, Lohrei and poitras in no order all can be very good regulars at some point within next 1-3 sessions

All they need to keep it going

As you know Dan, because we think a lot alike in many ways, it's not all doom and gloom. he "experts" are not high on the Bruins prospect pool. The Bruins do lack the high-end top-10 pick for obvious reasons. But it takes all kinds of players to fill out a roster.

If you draft one of the top-3 players available in the 2nd round, or 3rd round, or 4th round and so on, are you not doing something right? It's all about value where you are picking.

Again, lacking that high end player that comes with a top-10 or even top-15 pick, this doesn't look too bad:

View attachment 727164View attachment 727165
Love this chart
 

Blowfish

Count down ...
Jan 13, 2005
22,864
14,916
Southwestern Ontario
I was sitting with some folks during week and one made a comment to me ‘I’ve learned from Bruins fans that the regular season doesn’t matter, Development Camp is a love fest over players that will never make it, and if you don’t win the Stanley Cup you or soft and a choker - not one but both.’

I couldn’t have said it better

However I do believe Lysell, Lohrei and poitras in no order all can be very good regulars at some point within next 1-3 sessions

All they need to keep it going
DK what are your thoughts on Topo and Merk giving them a challenge? Topo was on fire prior to injury and Merk was consistently excellent all year long.
 

Saxon Eric

Registered User
Dec 18, 2005
20,287
27,356
I'm sure it's posted somewhere however why haven't the blue guys filed for arbitration? Showing my ignorance here lol.
They must have either settled their contract or are close enough to completion or aren't eligible for arbitration
 
  • Like
Reactions: hrdpuk

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,031
33,883
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
I'm sure it's posted somewhere however why haven't the blue guys filed for arbitration? Showing my ignorance here lol.
Teams file for arbitration to get a player in at lower than their qualifying offers. NJD did it with Timo Meier and Ottawa is trying to do the same with Alex DeBrincat.

Players file obviously to get a bigger payday but more recently to set a hard deadline for the team to come to terms. I'm not sure why Ian Mitchell filed, probably because he wants a one-way deal. With 1 NHL game under his belt, it's certainly not money.

Regula and DiPietro didn't have a leg to stand on in arbitration so why waste everyone's time and go through the process where they likely lose.

McLaughlin, I don't know. Like Eric said they are probably close and probably looking at the same type of deal Lauko got - 2-year deal with the first being two-way and second year being one-way with the $300K guaranteed in the first year.
 

DKH

The Bergeron of HF
Feb 27, 2002
74,295
52,160
DK what are your thoughts on Topo and Merk giving them a challenge? Topo was on fire prior to injury and Merk was consistently excellent all year long.
I was watching reruns of Seinfeld seasons 1-9, Mad Men, and Marvel movies in ‘release’ order while Eric was watching Providence like the Zapruder film

I saw them play early but only once after Jan 1 live so he’s way more up on this

I got the Merk inside because of my friend who both works and is close with him and he’s the real deal on and off ice - he’s going places (other than back to Russia) he’s got his head on straight and sweet hands and some matrix slow things down to game

Merk has gone from college hockey where he made first team all-Big 10 all-freshman team

He goes to Providence and makes All-Rookie team

He’s homered at first stops at two levels - playing against increasingly stronger and faster players

He’s smart, he adapts, he apparently is a killer on the power play off the wall or as the trigger guy

Why the F should he not be able to play

@Saxon Eric tells me center as do others so maybe long term he centers Zacha & Pastrnak?

I’m curious what McQuaid, Donnie etc think

Diiver is on a couple of podcasts I’m going to try and locate what he said about him

He is 22 and turns 23 in October so good age physically and success at NCAA and AHL

If success breeds success he should be good lol
 

Gee Wally

Old, Grumpy Moderator
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
74,630
89,573
HF retirement home


Poitras’s upside is apparent. Mason Lohrei and Fabian Lysell have been Boston’s premier prospects in a thin pipeline over the past few seasons.
But Matthew Poitras, a 2022 second-round pick, might be pushing his way into the conversation as the organization’s most intriguing young asset.

The 19-year-old forward doesn’t have the wheels or stick skills of Lysell, or the size of Lohrei (6 feet 4 inches), a playmaking defenseman. But the 6-foot, 182-pound pivot has the potential to be an impact pro thanks to his craftiness with the puck and hockey IQ.
Even though skating dropped Poitras out of the first round, Bruins assistant general manager Jamie Langenbrunner noted that the youngster’s “elite brain” allows him to generate Grade-A looks by way of changing pace, positioning down low, and poised passing.

Few surprises with Boston’s blue-chippers. Poitras has taken a major step forward during his short time in the organization. But the Bruins’ other two prized prospects, Lohrei and Lysell, were as advertised throughout the week.

Lohrei’s size and playmaking acumen on the blue line offer tremendous upside. His floor at the NHL level might be a third-pairing, power-play specialist.
After a slow build-up this week while recovering from a concussion, Lysell did plenty of damage during Friday’s three-on-three session thanks to his high-end skill.

Heft on the back end. A smaller, puck-moving stalwart has been a staple of the Bruins’ defensive units for more than a decade. But a quick glance at the development camp roster signals how the team is targeting more beef on the blue line.

The Bruins brought in 10 defensemen this week, nine of whom are in the organization. The average height of those 10? 6-3. Average weight? 204 pounds.

Hulking defensemen such as Kristian Kostadinski (2023 seventh-round pick) and Jackson Edward (2022 seventh-round pick) are still raw, but their prickliness was evident on most contact drills.

The smallest option on defense this week, Boston University’s Gallagher (2021 seventh-round pick) still made his presence felt during Friday’s scrimmage with sound stick work and physical push-back around the boards.

Duran seems destined for checking-line role. A physical forward such as Riley Duran seems like a lock as a fourth-line regular in due time.

The Woburn native and 2020 sixth-round pick has been productive during his two seasons at Providence College (39 points in 67 games). But Duran’s high motor and physicality are what stuck out during five-on-five action, especially on Friday.

If he carves a path to the NHL, Duran should ingratiate himself to the TD Garden crowd in short order, given his pugnacious and committed style.
 

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,031
33,883
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
They only got 3 picks next year unless they do something DC will be an invitational

A lot of people fixated on the draft, but it's not the only way of building a roster. Bussi wasn't drafted. Merkulov wasn't drafted. Toporowski wasn't drafted. McLaughlin wasn't drafted. All players the Lunatic Fringe has grown to like here. (and will soon like Ritchie).

I've said it a hundred times: Give me the 2024 draft over 2023 in terms of quality and depth top to bottom. Yeah they only have 3 picks but there are going to be players left over to fight over and not to mention the draft re-entries from this year that didn't get picked.

Artsatbanov for example is a draft re-entry for 2024. Bruins got a leg up on everyone by inviting him to camp. Ditto with Blake Smith.
 

Beesfan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2006
4,885
1,921
He’s a completely different player then Bergeron

I would be very surprised if he made Boston

There is a lot he can work on in CHL - strength, faceoffs, developing good habits and not bad because it’s easier

I see a lot of steak with his sizzle

The prospect I think that could surprise and make the Bruins is Lysell as a third line RW if Geekie starts of as third line center

Now that I think of it, the best comparison for Poitras from a style point may be Adam Oates. A bit smaller and less powerful than Krejci/Bergeron, not a tremendous skater, but extremely heady, creative, gritty and dedicated to improving.

If Poitras turns out to be as good as Oates then this is an out of the stadium home run.
 

DKH

The Bergeron of HF
Feb 27, 2002
74,295
52,160


Poitras’s upside is apparent. Mason Lohrei and Fabian Lysell have been Boston’s premier prospects in a thin pipeline over the past few seasons.
But Matthew Poitras, a 2022 second-round pick, might be pushing his way into the conversation as the organization’s most intriguing young asset.

The 19-year-old forward doesn’t have the wheels or stick skills of Lysell, or the size of Lohrei (6 feet 4 inches), a playmaking defenseman. But the 6-foot, 182-pound pivot has the potential to be an impact pro thanks to his craftiness with the puck and hockey IQ.
Even though skating dropped Poitras out of the first round, Bruins assistant general manager Jamie Langenbrunner noted that the youngster’s “elite brain” allows him to generate Grade-A looks by way of changing pace, positioning down low, and poised passing.

Few surprises with Boston’s blue-chippers. Poitras has taken a major step forward during his short time in the organization. But the Bruins’ other two prized prospects, Lohrei and Lysell, were as advertised throughout the week.

Lohrei’s size and playmaking acumen on the blue line offer tremendous upside. His floor at the NHL level might be a third-pairing, power-play specialist.
After a slow build-up this week while recovering from a concussion, Lysell did plenty of damage during Friday’s three-on-three session thanks to his high-end skill.

Heft on the back end. A smaller, puck-moving stalwart has been a staple of the Bruins’ defensive units for more than a decade. But a quick glance at the development camp roster signals how the team is targeting more beef on the blue line.

The Bruins brought in 10 defensemen this week, nine of whom are in the organization. The average height of those 10? 6-3. Average weight? 204 pounds.

Hulking defensemen such as Kristian Kostadinski (2023 seventh-round pick) and Jackson Edward (2022 seventh-round pick) are still raw, but their prickliness was evident on most contact drills.

The smallest option on defense this week, Boston University’s Gallagher (2021 seventh-round pick) still made his presence felt during Friday’s scrimmage with sound stick work and physical push-back around the boards.

Duran seems destined for checking-line role. A physical forward such as Riley Duran seems like a lock as a fourth-line regular in due time.

The Woburn native and 2020 sixth-round pick has been productive during his two seasons at Providence College (39 points in 67 games). But Duran’s high motor and physicality are what stuck out during five-on-five action, especially on Friday.

If he carves a path to the NHL, Duran should ingratiate himself to the TD Garden crowd in short order, given his pugnacious and committed style.
Deck reading materiel !!!!
 

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
29,461
17,893
Connecticut
Now that I think of it, the best comparison for Poitras from a style point may be Adam Oates. A bit smaller and less powerful than Krejci/Bergeron, not a tremendous skater, but extremely heady, creative, gritty and dedicated to improving.

If Poitras turns out to be as good as Oates then this is an out of the stadium home run.

As good as one of the 10 greatest passers in NHL history?

More like a grand slam in extra innings of game 7 in the World Seies. Out of the stadium.
 

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
29,461
17,893
Connecticut
As you know Dan, because we think a lot alike in many ways, it's not all doom and gloom. he "experts" are not high on the Bruins prospect pool. The Bruins do lack the high-end top-10 pick for obvious reasons. But it takes all kinds of players to fill out a roster.

If you draft one of the top-3 players available in the 2nd round, or 3rd round, or 4th round and so on, are you not doing something right? It's all about value where you are picking.

Again, lacking that high end player that comes with a top-10 or even top-15 pick, this doesn't look too bad:

View attachment 727164View attachment 727165

Wondering how you view Oskar Steen.

He's shown flashes of skill at the NHL level on the right wing, where to Bruins have no depth.

What's holding him back?
 

False Start

Registered User
May 8, 2018
711
699
Wondering how you view Oskar Steen.

He's shown flashes of skill at the NHL level on the right wing, where to Bruins have no depth.

What's holding him back?
He’s impressed me almost everytime he’s come up. Then his overall plays slows and we send him back down.

Also curious because he doesn’t seem to dominate at the AHL either. Still. The return from him as a sixth rounder isn’t so bad thus far.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad