Oddbob
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2016
- 15,917
- 10,463
They couldn't get that done without an arbiter?
Bertuzzi definitely wanted more than that and longer term.
They couldn't get that done without an arbiter?
Hope Bert’s camp doesn’t hold some ire over this. That contract is much lower than most Wings fans anticipated even with covid adjustment.
And teams normally carry 14 forwards
Of course as it was a silly take.Also... going to arbitration is a normal thing in the NHL. So I don't understand the litany of "OMG TYLER BERTUZZI HATES THE WINGS NOW BECAUSE THEY WENT TO ARBITRATION ooooohhhh spooky"
I would be willing to bet a decent sum of money that Tyler wasn't even in the room for it. He probably worked with his agent and his agent said this is your best way to maybe get a 4M contract this year. This is the way you have a chance at the most money.
Bertuzzi filed for arb. What are you on about? This wasn't Detroit's call to go before the arbitrator. If you're Bertuzzi and you think the arbitrator is going to give you closer to 4M, why would you settle for 3.5M from the team?
This is a regular negotiation event... and let's be honest, I don't think Tyler Bertuzzi was in the room for this. Pretty certain his agent fielded this. Damaging the relationship isn't seeing through an arbitration case. It would be cutting his minutes or not putting him in the best place to succeed. Tyler's uncle played here. He's played here a couple years. He knows what Detroit and Yzerman are about.
Talk about damaging relationship with a key player to save 200 k. Not sure I get it from Detroit, to be honest.
Yzerman clearly doesn't see him as a key player. And he might be right. Bertuzzi has been riding the coattails of two vastly more talented linemates.
He's named him multiple times as a key player...
You don't take someone you consider a key player to an actual arbitration hearing. You don't scoff at paying someone you consider a key player in the range of $4 million annually. Obviously Yzerman is smart enough not to publicly trash a trade asset.
You're more than welcome to listen to the countless interviews where he's named him as such.
Go ahead and name which players Yzerman signed to shit deals in Tampa. He knows how to negotiate. Bert's still an RFA at the end.
Bertuzzi will be on a different team within a year. There's a reason Yzerman is handling the Mantha negotiations much differently. Mantha is a player he has identified as a long term core piece.
Further to my last point: of the 11 arbitration hearings that have occurred since 2016, 7 players were traded within a calendar year of their hearing date (Djoos, Edmundson, Rodrigues, Ceci, Kulak, Trouba) and an additional 2 (Anton Forsberg, Gemel Smith) joined other teams as free agents.
I'm willing to admit I'm wrong if you can cite even a single example in the history of NHL salary arbitration (25+ years) where a team has honored a player's arbitration award and kept him around long term.
Hell just from last summer's six arbitration hearings alone, Christian Djoos (WSH), Joel Edmundson (STL) and Evan Rodrigues (BUF) have all been traded already. Teams and players alike simply do not go down this road if they are happy with each other. There is a HUGE difference between filing for arbitration as a negotiating tactic and actually going through with the hearing.
What matters though is that Bert is very happy in DET & loves his linemates etc & vice versa. This arbitration was more a product of C19 & gives Bert another year to prove his true worth, while not coincidentally saving the team $ & cap. There's been no reports of any negative news regarding Bert & the Wings. If Nielsen also happens to get bought out, then "conspiracy theorists" suggest it could've been the Wings who prompted Bert to go this route, opening up a window for Frans to be bought out. Bert is a key player for us & is treated as such, this isn't even a blip on a proverbial radar. He's a huge part of our Top6F now & moving forward & will likely score some huge & timely goals on our way to future Cup(s).Further to my last point: of the 11 arbitration hearings that have occurred since 2016, 7 players were traded within a calendar year of their hearing date (Djoos, Edmundson, Rodrigues, Ceci, Kulak, Trouba) and an additional 2 (Anton Forsberg, Gemel Smith) joined other teams as free agents.
Which 2 stayed?
The trouble here is our top line, shouldn't be getting top line minutes. So Mantha/Bertuzzi and even Larkin... Are likely getting a lot more production and ice time than they should be getting if we had a more talented roster.
Under these circumstances, I feel its a smart move to do shorter 1-3 year deals on these players.
I'm willing to admit I'm wrong if you can cite even a single example in the history of NHL salary arbitration (25+ years) where a team has honored a player's arbitration award and kept him around long term.
Hell just from last summer's six arbitration hearings alone, Christian Djoos (WSH), Joel Edmundson (STL) and Evan Rodrigues (BUF) have all been traded already. Teams and players alike simply do not go down this road if they are happy with each other. There is a HUGE difference between filing for arbitration as a negotiating tactic and actually going through with the hearing.
It’s fascinating to see some of the reaction here. Holland was ran out of town for signing vets to bloated contracts now some are borderline Upset/annoyed that Bert didn’t get enough money?
Management can’t do anything right
Andrew Copp (Jets opted for 2-year arbitration award which he's still playing on) and Nate Schmidt. Honestly Schmidt might be the best and only example of a player who stuck around after an arb hearing but of course he was eventually traded too.
I think Yzerman sees it the same way and Bertuzzi is the least likely of the three to be a legit top six forward on a championship team so it makes sense to move on. Especially with Raymond and Zadina in the system. I would guess another Athanasiou-type return for Bert at this season's deadline.
Name an example in NHL history where a few dozen decent RFAs weren't even qualified because 75% of the league got crushed by the cap.
Go back to spitting out hot takes about how Bertuzzi has the same deadline value as Athanasiou.
Athanasiou was always a problem for us. Not the fans, but the coaches and his play style.
He didn't play winning hockey.
Bertuzzi is the opposite. I think we are penny pinching on Bertuzzi to make a point about how Detroit doesn't overpay anymore, and then I still think it would be in our best interest to retain the player. On the next deal Bert will have more leverage and we will likely sign him to a number closer to his ask.
I don't think he meant to be rude. Just that these situations usually involve players moving later. I really do think with the style of game Bertuzzi plays, that Yzerman may push for lowest salary possible, but he should know Bert isn't the kind of player we should be trading.
Schmidt stayed after his hearing.You don't take someone you consider a key player to an actual arbitration hearing. You don't scoff at paying someone you consider a key player in the range of $4 million annually. Obviously Yzerman is smart enough not to publicly trash a trade asset.
Bertuzzi will be on a different team within a year. There's a reason Yzerman is handling the Mantha negotiations much differently. Mantha is a player he has identified as a long term core piece.
Further to my last point: of the 11 arbitration hearings that have occurred since 2016, 7 players were traded within a calendar year of their hearing date (Djoos, Edmundson, Rodrigues, Ceci, Kulak, Trouba) and an additional 2 (Anton Forsberg, Gemel Smith) joined other teams as free agents.