Since they mentioned they want someone to kill penalties, i'm guessing they want someone they "trust". Lashoff is prob the one that fits that mold the best.Great! We got Lashoff in tonight. NOW we have a chance against the leafs.
Seriously though, Isn't there anyone else who might actually be a possible future d-man in GR? I know they mentioned they want someone to kill penalties.
I get where you're going, but I think Megan was recalled just to give them an available 4th line worthy warm body while they have no spare forwards (and now dmen) heading into to Toronto.
In the same vein however, I'm betting it'll be Hicketts over Hronek...
Do the advanced stats actually say that? I thought they said the opposite?So we bring up the love child of Big E and DDK. Had one above average year and we get stuck with him. Now going to wait for the rebuttle from the sabremetrics guys saying hes a top 4 defenceman..
Only a Jimmy Howard groin injury awayLose for Hughes.
Then we've got this in the bag.Only a Jimmy Howard groin injury away
cutting Cholowski's minutes more and more after his very good start to the season? calling up Lashoff over Hronek?
and people wonder why all the defensemen this organization drafts end up being terrible
Great! We got Lashoff in tonight. NOW we have a chance against the leafs.
Seriously though, Isn't there anyone else who might actually be a possible future d-man in GR? I know they mentioned they want someone to kill penalties.
On the one hand, the 7th defenseman will make absolutely no difference...barring he doesn't completely wet the bed, and cough up 3-4 premium scoring chances per game.
On the other hand, if it's not a huge impact to the team either way, then why would you bring up a "safe" guy with no future in Lashoff, over a kid with an interesting ceiling in Hronek?
(If they still think Hronek isn't close to ready, so be it. But if the kid is even close, I'd much rather watch him work out a kink or two than watch a career Griffin yet again.)