It's the old HF Boards double standard if you ask me.
People criticise Krejci's play, and folks reply with...well he's on pace for X number of points. Ignoring the rest of his game.
Meanwhile a young player like Donato did late last year, comes in a puts up points, and all we hear is "what about his 200 ft. game" and "he's losing board battles".
Overall I thought Krejci's game has been fairly lousy this year.
Now, that being said, it doesn't mean he's a terrible player, nor does that mean other teams wouldn't want him.
But his trade value isn't massive, and he's simply not the player he used to be IMO. He's a high end No.3/low end No.2 two-way playmaking C. He's not a 1-A/1-B level C anymore.
I don't see him going anywhere. So the Bruins can either concede he's the No.2 C for better or worse and try to get him some help, or put him on the 3rd line and lessen his role even further.