Sample sizes
So, by your theory, by sacking DD the Habs would gain roughly 30 standings points a year without him and playing Eller instead? Guy's getting in the HOF for sure with this kind of impact.
Sample sizes
So, by your theory, by sacking DD the Habs would gain roughly 30 standings points a year without him and playing Eller instead? Guy's getting in the HOF for sure with this kind of impact.
The 26-1-1 is certainly an exaggeration, however, it's easier for a good team to fluke itself to a great record than it is for a bad team to fluke itself to a good record.
Would the team win 26 in 28 games with DD on the IR? No, but the evidence suggests it would play better, since offensive time would be redistributed to superior players.
The 26-1-1 is certainly an exaggeration, however, it's easier for a good team to fluke itself to a great record than it is for a bad team to fluke itself to a good record.
Would the team win 26 in 28 games with DD on the IR? No, but the evidence suggests it would play better, since offensive time would be redistributed to superior players.
Actually its not an exaggeration. In games where Ellers TOI is greater than DDs or lower by less than 10 seconds, the habs really are 26-1-1, feel free to validate that yourself.
Not what he meant. Only means that there's either lurking variables or sheer luck in that record.
26-1-1 = fluke
Lololololololololololol
I don't think he's saying it's a fluke. You guys are about to engage in a semantical argument...26-1-1 = fluke
Lololololololololololol
He has no more excuses NOT to shoot after this last regular season game!!!!!
26-1-1 = fluke
Lololololololololololol