That's the thing. You can put virtually anyone in that role and get equal production.
Either anyone could do it, and DD contributes nothing basically since anyone could do it. Or you've just exaggerated like crazy and no, not everyone can get equal production.
And spoiler... it's the latter. DD is a fine playmaker with excellent hockey sense, vision and passing skills. He's also got an underrated wrister that he should use more. He is also small, not great defensively and not as fast as you'd like a player of his stature to be. But overall, he's an useful little player for a 3.5M cap hit and he clearly brings something to the Vanek/Patch duo that not every other center on the team could bring. If you compare with Briere, he wouldn't be a good fit because Briere likes to shoot more than DD. With Vanek and Patch we don't need a guy that's more of a playmaker and since you already have two star player together in Patch/DD, they don't need to have a Crosby/Getzlaf centering them. DD fits the bill perfectly.
Again. I'd rather see other more valuable centered put in that role. If DD is as great as everyone thinks he is then he should be productive on another line or at wing. This would give us size upfront and would better spread firepower through the top 3 lines.
See you don't make sense at all. If you say that Plekanec is better than DD and you put Plekanec with Vanek/Patch, doesn't it spread the offense even less ?
See, our strength is that we have depth at center. No true all star center who can do it all (log huge minutes while producing at a ppg) but the sum of all parts add up to more than the individual parts given the way they are currently used. And we don't spend a lot on them. Hell, Galchenyuk+Eller+Plekanec+DD make a combined 10-11M cap hit. Just Getzlaf makes 8.2M in cap hit. So, we have cap space to get wingers which are better than our centers. Guys like Vanek. Or, to be carried by our goaltending/defense.
A lot of the arguments being put forth are just disguised hatred for DD. He's a fine player. Useful. We can win with him. He makes 3.5M and he won't be carrying the team, he shouldn't be expected to. He's not our best player on the ice, nor is he paid like he is. I can already hear your response that he is used like our best player but that's a load of BS. He's used in a way that makes sense within the team. Hell, we've been winning games like crazy despite some truly horrendous showing from our D at times. All lines are producing because Vanek has pushed Gionta to the third line, and Gallagher can play with Plekanec, so everything is where it should be. I don't see what's there to complain about. The problem was always that we didn't have enough quality wingers considering that our centers aren't exactly super stars. Vanek changed everything.
Let's hope galchenyuk develops into a good center man because DD is taking up a lot of development space.
Galchenyuk not playing center has absolutely nothing to do with DD.
If Galchenyuk were to dislodge someone to play center, he'd be dislodging Eller or Briere on a 3rd line. MT does not believe that AG is ready to be a center, and I happen to agree with him.
When you people try to dump every situations you don't like on DD's shoulders, it exposes your lack of understanding of the situation OR your irrational dislike for the player. At this point, it looks like you guys are desperately clutching at straws. It's hard to understand for me because, if anything, a local player should always be getting favorable bias. Why is it the opposite where a local player gets reverse bias and can't ever win ?