jjniner
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2016
- 485
- 311
curios to see who else gets in the mix
It’s hard to tell because he always reports teams are talking about a player which could be true, but it doesn’t mean a trade actually happensPagnotta's track record is spotty
Team can’t score and limits chances against better than most teams in the league. Team adds defenceman. Makes sense to me.
This is the reality, I think there was a quote somewhere that fans would be shocked how often teams discuss player values without actually trading. Almost like checking asset value but instead of looking up a stock price you’ve got 31 peers who have different values for roles.It’s hard to tell because he always reports teams are talking about a player which could be true, but it doesn’t mean a trade actually happens
Has Pagnotta ever broken a trade first?
Seems as bad as Eklund
That seems to make more sense than the rumours out there but I am just not a fan of Karlsson. We already have Huberdeau’s contract looking like a potential anchorTell you what... you go for a retained Karlsson and we'll take Parayko. Problem solved, see you in the playoffs.
But not as bad as Dreger
Oilers pursuing more offence (if Karlsson rumours stand true), Flames pursuing more defence…Team can’t score and limits chances against better than most teams in the league. Team adds defenceman. Makes sense to me.
He broke Tavares to Toronto and has lived off of that ever sinceHas Pagnotta ever broken a trade first?
Seems as bad as Eklund
Didn't people on here break that, too ?He broke Tavares to Toronto and has lived off of that ever since
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!! I'll be in heaven if it happens.