Rumor: Dave Pagnotta Reporting Blues/Calgary discussing Parayko

[jjniner]

curios to see who else gets in the mix

Click to read more...

 

[SeanMoneyHands]

Killington one for one.

 

[Satoru Gojo]

Pagnotta's track record is spotty

 

[mouser]

curios to see who else gets in the mix

Please include a link in the first post

 

[Tkachuk Norris]

Team can’t score and limits chances against better than most teams in the league. Team adds defenceman. Makes sense to me.

 

[Martinez]

Pagnotta's track record is spotty

It’s hard to tell because he always reports teams are talking about a player which could be true, but it doesn’t mean a trade actually happens

 

[DJB]

Has Pagnotta ever broken a trade first?

Seems as bad as Eklund

 

[Seachd]

“Reporting” where?

 

[bucks_oil]

Team can’t score and limits chances against better than most teams in the league. Team adds defenceman. Makes sense to me.

Tell you what... you go for a retained Karlsson and we'll take Parayko. Problem solved, see you in the playoffs.

 

[Colezuki]

It’s hard to tell because he always reports teams are talking about a player which could be true, but it doesn’t mean a trade actually happens

This is the reality, I think there was a quote somewhere that fans would be shocked how often teams discuss player values without actually trading. Almost like checking asset value but instead of looking up a stock price you’ve got 31 peers who have different values for roles.

I wouldn’t be shocked if the flames are just past that stage. Say they said a 2nd and the blues are haggling

 

[The Real JT]

Has Pagnotta ever broken a trade first?

Seems as bad as Eklund

But not as bad as Dreger

 

[Tkachuk Norris]

Tell you what... you go for a retained Karlsson and we'll take Parayko. Problem solved, see you in the playoffs.

That seems to make more sense than the rumours out there but I am just not a fan of Karlsson. We already have Huberdeau’s contract looking like a potential anchor

 

[Gaylord Q Tinkledink]

But not as bad as Dreger

That's an oof, but still better than Pagnotta.

 

[PuckG]

Team can’t score and limits chances against better than most teams in the league. Team adds defenceman. Makes sense to me.

Oilers pursuing more offence (if Karlsson rumours stand true), Flames pursuing more defence…

The **** is happening?

 

[bleedblue1223]

Link?

 

[crazyfisherman]

I rather trade for karlsson and play him at rw.......

 

[Some Other Flame]

lol what? Flames already have Andersson, Tanev and Weegar as right shot defenseman. Although Weegar comfortable both sides. This makes no sense.

 

[leafsfan5]

Has Pagnotta ever broken a trade first?

Seems as bad as Eklund

He broke Tavares to Toronto and has lived off of that ever since

 

[TheGreenTBer]

@super6646

 

[Gaylord Q Tinkledink]

He broke Tavares to Toronto and has lived off of that ever since

Didn't people on here break that, too ?

 

[Majorityof1]

I don't buy it. It doesn't seem to make sense for either team. With Anderson and Weegar as top 4 RHD, wouldn't Calgary prefer to look for a LHD to replace Zadorov? Weegar can play LD, so it isn't insane, but doesn't seem like the player they would target.

What would the Blues want out of it? Is it a RHD for RHD swap? Parayko for Weegar? Most of Calgary's best prospects are wingers and goalies, no? That is where the Blues prospect pool is strongest. We need D and C. I mean, I'd take Coronato, but I doubt Calgary would get rid of him for a guy on their 2nd pair that's going to knock their other 2nd pair D to his offside. Is Zary their best C/D prospect? He doesn't really move the needle for me.

 

[Linkens Mastery]

I dont see a fit for either side.

 

[super6646]

@super6646

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!! I'll be in heaven if it happens.

 

[BAdvocate]

When I think of Parayko, he reminds me of Zadora and vice versa.....and then I imagine them as Rock 'em Sock 'em Robots.

 

[Sparky93]

Probably means we're looking at ROR.