- Jul 10, 2007
- 2,501
- 2,583
He’s got an elite shot and is a good skater. The organization knows his strengths and weaknesses but like a guy like Kessel he’s not a player that has a particularly long shelf life with teams just because they literally only bring one dimension.
I see his upside as 30-35 goals. Don’t think he’s got the vision or passing ability to put up huge assist numbers - to me he’s almost the same player as Kessel except without the vision and passing ability.
I agree Sprong is one-dimensional (or perhaps more accurately, not a complete player) at this point. The reason he was traded - and then periodically scratched by the ducks - was because he was bad in his own end and played without structure. I saw improvement in those areas (more still needed) and more importantly, I saw effort. He's 22 and was rushed to the NHL - it clearly stunted his development. Maybe he's forever ruined and uncoachable- I tend to doubt that. It seems to me Eakins is the perfect coach for a player like him.
He won't put up huge assist numbers because he's a shoot first guy (as well he should be). But last year he had 14g and 9 assists. Not exactly one dimensional offensively. When I watched him play - and I focused on him quite a bit - I saw a willing passer who had pretty good vision. That being said, goals are more valuable than assists, so I'm fine with a guy "who just scores goals" as long as he's adequate. You need players like that - the ducks especially.