Value of: (D) BRADEN SCHNEIDER (NYR)
- Thread starter inxs
- Start date
He’s the type of player you need on defense and teams look for. I think he has more value than people think, but will also demand a larger contract soon then people think as well (I’m sure you can bridge him for cheap)
John Mandalorian
2022 Avs: The First Dance
- Nov 29, 2018
- 10,983
- 6,789
NYR should hang on to him and be patient. After that draft, it was mentioned that the Avs were trying to trade up for him. Instead, they drafted Barron.
It's definitely better to keep him than Hoglander or Arizonas "treasure trove" of 2nds and most everything else that has been mentioned in this thread.
It's definitely better to keep him than Hoglander or Arizonas "treasure trove" of 2nds and most everything else that has been mentioned in this thread.
- Jul 28, 2011
- 15,133
- 9,927
2 years ago I would have looked at this differently. I'm not sure when Soderstrom will make the full time jump to the NHL. Rangers need a legit replacement unless they find an option elsewhere. We don't really have somebody who can jump into the line-up and take those minutes. So if Soderstrom isn't that guy, yet, it's just not possible to trade Schneider. We can do a lot with those second rounds. Those are great deadline assets for a team in potential playoff hunt through those years, but it's too hard to replace Schneider right now.
Minten + Liljegren for Schneider give the Rangers a replacement RD plus a strong two way center prospect with size.
I didn’t think they were. Similarly neither is Schneider. I think that’s sort of the point - someone inquired about him and the reality is he’s only moved in a pure hockey trade that addresses a need. I used your guys as an example of that type of trade, but just like I’m not sure why we’d be moving Schneider, I don’t know why you’d be moving either of those guys.
Really pulling for the Sens to put it together next season, btw. Like your team a lot.
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
Frankie Blueberries
Allergic to draft picks
- Jan 27, 2016
- 9,202
- 10,677
Selectively only posting bad stats is hilarious. Hoglander has a good chance at hitting 25-30 goals this year without any power play time and spending the first half of the season on the 4th line while on a great contract. Would not be surprised if he had more value league-wide than Schneider currently does.
Sounds great. If he has more value than Schneider keep him. I'm sure he'll continue shooting 23.2% going forward.
Wierzbowski426
Registered User
He's not very good, teams should be wary of overpaying like dallas did for the last rangers d.
Frankie Blueberries
Allergic to draft picks
- Jan 27, 2016
- 9,202
- 10,677
You realize it was a fictional trade proposal. I threw it out there to see what Rangers fans thought as on the surface, the two players appear to have similar value given their ages and production so far.
I am happy if the Canucks keep Hoglander. We are the best team in the league right now
GG
- Jul 28, 2011
- 15,133
- 9,927
There's a big difference between Schneider and an unknown in Nils at the time of the trade.
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
eco's bones
Registered User
The Rangers need the player at the position. Unless some team wants to massively overpay for him it would be dumb for us to move him. It does seem some Rangers fans are panicked over Chytil but creating a hole on defense to try to fill a 3C hole is not something I would be interested in. Rangers do have potential centers in the pipeline like McConnell-Barker or lower down Edstrom, Rempe. We don't have any D depth.
As far as Schneider's next contract I imagine they'll bridge him. We don't need to lock up long term what is essentially a very young bottom 6 defender. As well his offensive game hasn't really popped so I see him getting a decent raise but to me $2 mil per is pushing it. If he gets more than that it won't be by much and he might even get a little bit less. Even so Rangers will still have rights after his second contract so he's a controlled player. There is no reason for us to feel panicked about him or his next contract or so.
As far as Schneider's next contract I imagine they'll bridge him. We don't need to lock up long term what is essentially a very young bottom 6 defender. As well his offensive game hasn't really popped so I see him getting a decent raise but to me $2 mil per is pushing it. If he gets more than that it won't be by much and he might even get a little bit less. Even so Rangers will still have rights after his second contract so he's a controlled player. There is no reason for us to feel panicked about him or his next contract or so.
I just remember "the rangers schooled Fitz by taking the guy he was going to pick! They forced him to panic and choose some funny named Russian guy!" narrative.
"We want Kakko" and now this.
You could say that its premature to put Muk above Schneider but I feel good enough to cash in my chips now.
I'll go to the penalty box now.
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
Oh. Outside of the last sentence, I have no idea what you're talking about.
Last edited:
WTFMAN99
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2009
- 33,066
- 11,079
Rangers are at times. Not many players go crash the net and play aggressive with an edge especially on defense.
WTFMAN99
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2009
- 33,066
- 11,079
You have one of the best in Trouba.
Analytically, Liljegen is better than Schneider defensively but it's a trade off in grit, I agree.
I'd say just fine a real tough SOB for 3rd pairing LD next year. I think this transaction around Liljegren and Schneider is likely an off-season thing but if you got someone good defensively and tough like Seeler?
Lingren-Fox
Miller-Trouba
Seeler-Liljegren
Net improvement but will have to see how the rest of the year unfolds.
thanks but supply + demand, so few RD available so no
plus
we want to do KK + Cuyle w/a pivot
Ad
Latest posts
-
Pre-Game Talk: Oilers vs. Canucks - time to make Vancouver rainier than usual- Latest: bobbythebrain
-
