Stone's career high is 73pts. Marchand just put up seasons of 85, 85 and 100pts. Stone has never been close to a top 10 pts finish, Marchand has come top 5 2x. They are in no way "close enough" in scoring, unless you think a ~60pt guy = a ~90pt guy.
Stone has 158 points in his last 150 games, the majority of which was spent on one of the worst offensive teams in the league. He's not a 60 point guy
Marchand's production should probably put him ahead but Stone is pretty close. The hot takes on Stone's offense are terrible though.
Yet he has only hit 70pts once in a season.
If this is the case, so does Marners
So? Marchand had only hit 90 points once yet you had no problem calling him that.
Explain how he's better offensively.Stone is better than Marchand offensively and defensively.
Really annoys me when people just look at point totals and act like they tell anything.
Explain how he's better offensively.
Stone is better than Marchand offensively and defensively.
Really annoys me when people just look at point totals and act like they tell anything.
Marchand hit 85 in 80, then 85 in like 68 or something and then 100 in 79.So? Marchand had only hit 90 points once yet you had no problem calling him that.