Confirmed with Link: Coyotes trade Strome and Perlini for Nick Schmaltz - Part Deux

[Fuhrious]

Based on what, exactly? His track record with the team up to the trade appeared to indicate otherwise?

 

[Jakey53]

Based on what, exactly? His track record with the team up to the trade appeared to indicate otherwise?

RT never played him with talent or put him in a position to succeed.

 

[BUX7PHX]

Thought you said you were done with this Jake.

 

[tuxonpups]

Spooner just scored on the Roadrunners, another Strome trade working out well for us...

 

[Jakey53]

Thought you said you were done with this Jake.

I was waiting for someone to catch that post.

 

[Pez68]

Thank you, John Chayka, for gifting the Hawks a 2nd line center. And a damn good one at that.

 

[MIGs Dog]

Thank you, John Chayka, for gifting the Hawks a 2nd line center. And a damn good one at that.

Part of the top secret tank plan. Hawks now ahead of Coyotes in standings.

 

[Matias Maccete]

Part of the top secret tank plan. Hawks now ahead of Coyotes in standings.

Step 1: Tank
Step 2: Mismanage player you draft, trade them away
Step 3: Tank again
Step 4: Profit

 

[RemoAZ]

I thought this was pretty funny from the Chicago board (w/Chi 31gm, 10g, 17a, 27p +/- 0):

​

 

[Edenjung]

I thought this was pretty funny from the Chicago board (w/Chi 31gm, 10g, 17a, 27p +/- 0):

​

Hhahah lol.

 

[The don godfather]

I have no doubt that schmaltz would have more points then strome if he was playing. It's just pure bad luck and why the trade looks tilted right now. He was playing so well. I wouldn't smash chyka for this. He got great young talent back and I'm sure it will show next year.

 

[rt]

I have no doubt that schmaltz would have more points then strome if he was playing. It's just pure bad luck and why the trade looks tilted right now. He was playing so well. I wouldn't smash chyka for this. He got great young talent back and I'm sure it will show next year.

I have plenty of doubt. Schmaltz was putting up .82ppg and Strome is putting up .87ppg. It stands to reason that Strome would be outscoring him given the same number of games.

 

[RABBIT]

Man Stromer is killing it. Usually I am more of a realist rather than a pessimist/optimist because there are a lot of one-siders on this board, but I'm beginning to feel pretty pessimistic about this trade. I really do like Nick Schmaltz and I think at the end of the day it will look a little bit more even than this first year has suggested. That being said I have a feeling Strome could consistently put up 50-60 pts in this league from now on, and that's what i have a problem with. Why not just give him his chance? Tocchet and staff failed him.

 

[The Feckless Puck]

Good for Strome, and bad for us. I am happy for one thing, and that is that I no longer have to be embarrassed about pumping Strome's tires for so long.

 

[MIGs Dog]

Strome is putting up some numbers, but I think it's too early to call this trade a loss.

Last night he had 3 assists
1. 5 on 3 where he made an OK pass that essentially was a broken play goal.
2. Nice blind pass. Kudos.
3. OT goal where he happened to be last guy to touch it in d zone. Goal was one man show by Toews.

As others have mentioned, he's playing with some top talent.

I wasn't pushing for the Strome trade, but like what I've seen from Schmaltz.

 

[Jamieh]

I have plenty of doubt. Schmaltz was putting up .82ppg and Strome is putting up .87ppg. It stands to reason that Strome would be outscoring him given the same number of games.

There is little doubt Schmaltz would have benefited from the torrid pace of goal scoring the Coyote's are currently on.

 

[MIGs Dog]

There is little doubt Schmaltz would have benefited from the torrid pace of goal scoring the Coyote's are currently on.

You forgot the .

What we will not know is how Schmaltz and Strome would have done had they not been traded. How much of a players success depends on those around them? I think a great deal.

 

[Jamieh]

You forgot the .

What we will not know is how Schmaltz and Strome would have done had they not been traded. How much of a players success depends on those around them? I think a great deal.

For some reason this tablet of mine will not do emojis ??

 

[Jamieh]

You forgot the .

What we will not know is how Schmaltz and Strome would have done had they not been traded. How much of a players success depends on those around them? I think a great deal.

I saw nothing from Strome here to suggest trading him would be a mistake. Success with greatness doesn't change that.

 

[rt]

Schmaltz is only 12.5 months older. I think people forget that. The narrative seems to be we gave away the much younger player with much higher upside. There’s a very good chance Strome ends up better and we lose this trade. But we shouldn’t lose sight of the the fact that only twelve and a half months separate the two.

 

[rt]

I saw nothing from Strome here to suggest trading him would be a mistake. Success with greatness doesn't change that.

.82 in AZ is probably more impressive than .87 in Chicago. That’s true. Strome is getting hotter and hotter, though. Could be next year he’s a 1ppg player for the Hawks and we’d be lucky to get .75 out of Schmaltz.

Similarly, Galchenyuk is only 12.5 months older than Domi. Again, most of us keep forgetting that because Galchenyuk has been in the league much longer, that he’s not actually much older. He’s .60ppg and Domi is .85ppg.

Still, we clearly lost that trade. Nobody should be impressed with John Chayka right now.

 

[HawksBeerFan]

Strome is putting up some numbers, but I think it's too early to call this trade a loss.

Last night he had 3 assists
1. 5 on 3 where he made an OK pass that essentially was a broken play goal.
2. Nice blind pass. Kudos.
3. OT goal where he happened to be last guy to touch it in d zone. Goal was one man show by Toews.

As others have mentioned, he's playing with some top talent.

I wasn't pushing for the Strome trade, but like what I've seen from Schmaltz.

Schmaltz success/production in Chicago came when he was riding shotgun with Kane. So, yes, Strome's production is coming alongside very good players, but the same is true of Schmaltz before he was traded.

 

[CLW]

Step 1: Tank
Step 2: Mismanage player you draft, trade them away
Step 3: Tank again
Step 4: Profit

But where is the "Collect underpants" part? We need to collect underpants too!

 

[Mosby]

Even if they draw even, I like Schmaltz's style more. Certainly a better fit for Tocchet's style too.

Perlini is starting to look like Duclair.

 

[Grimes]

Wait til Schmaltz is playing with Kack Hughes