Jakey53
Registered User
- Aug 27, 2011
- 30,226
- 9,227
That would be nice. Merkley may surprise.
Merkley
That would be nice. Merkley may surprise.
High upside. Unique skill set. 2-3 years before he is even close to making NHL. Needs to improve skating and ability to adapt to players coming down at him with speed. Also could be more physically assertive. Not just be big.That would be sweet if Merkley proves he's ready to challenge for a spot on the big team.
And Soderstrom sounds like he's going to be a beauty.
What is the thinking on Bahl?
That would be sweet if Merkley proves he's ready to challenge for a spot on the big team.
And Soderstrom sounds like he's going to be a beauty.
What is the thinking on Bahl?
High upside. Unique skill set. 2-3 years before he is even close to making NHL. Needs to improve skating and ability to adapt to players coming down at him with speed. Also could be more physically assertive. Not just be big.
When I watched Bahl in his draft year, I saw a guy with very good straight line speed (size aside) and amazing straight line speed (for his size). I saw a guy who was as awkward in terms of overall mobility as you would expect for a 6’6” 17 year old. That is to say he lacked quickness and agility. But was amazing when he got going.I thought that Bahl was a very good skater? Or is it one of those "good skater for his size" type of endorsement?
I think that Bahl may be closer than people think to being an NHL player. Seems to read the offensive play well and positions himself correctly. And most importantly, you can't teach size and length.
This kid can skate. Honestly you would think he's 5'10" out there. It's actually quite surprising.
That’s a bit hyperbolic, I think. I watched him at the U18s and was impressed with his straight line speed but dismissed him pretty quickly as lacking quickness, lateral mobility and the ability to change directions quickly.
I think he’s a powerful skater, who’s fast for his size, but his overall “skating ability” needs a ton of development. I would not have considered him in the top 62. Though, that has a lot to do with offensive upside.
He looks lost in the offensive zone. Like he can’t wait bail out and go play D. It’s sort of like reverse cherry-picking. Like the opposite of how Nikita Filatov would just hang out at his own blue line in the offensive zone, beaver-tailing and just hoping for an off man rush. Bahl seems like he’d be just as happy to never cross his own side of the redline.
Now I’m the one exaggerating.
He’s seven foot tall with a muffin of a shot and a Frankenstein skating style. He’s good defensively and he’s mean, but any big hit he throws in the nhl will be an automatic penalty for checking while tall.
Disclaimer: I’ve one see him play one tournament ever.
He needs to improve his defending speed. He needs to learn when to close the gap and go for the hit and when to continue to skate backwards. At the U20 camp I saw a few times he was in no mans land. Scared people who going to race around him the second he went for the hit. His skating with the puck is good.Funny. Here’s an exchange from 15months ago:
Heh. My memory is a little bit lacking.
When I watched Bahl in his draft year, I saw a guy with very good straight line speed (size aside) and amazing straight line speed (for his size). I saw a guy who was as awkward in terms of overall mobility as you would expect for a 6’6” 17 year old. That is to say he lacked quickness and agility. But was amazing when he got going.
I also saw a guy who hit to hurt and played mean when up to speed but struggled to maximize that power when play was slower and closer. In other words, he wasn’t ragdolling anyone but he was willing to light people up. He had mass and leverage, but not real power.
All of the above meant I saw I guy who was good when his feet were moving. Effective. Even special. And a guy who was poor when his feet slowed or stopped moving. Ineffective. Like a future draft bust.
I didn’t see him ply last season.
Yes. I noted I’m in him because it’s especially true of him. Notably so. That’s the point.Can't this be said about many players, though? If you are moving your feet in the proper ways, then you'll probably find yourself in good position and if you look like you are standing still, you will look bad? That was my chief complaint about our PP in the Tippett years - too much standing still. Only Whitney looked like he was constantly moving his feet and changing angles. Everyone else looked like they were standing still.
Lo and behold, our PP was not great from an effectiveness standpoint.
Will Bunting have a shot at making the coyotes? We need someone like that to agitate the opposition.
He's going to have to do what Garland did. Seize an opportunity when it's presented and make it so they have to deal someone else to create a roster spot.Will Bunting have a shot at making the coyotes? We need someone like that to agitate the opposition.
Yes. I noted I’m in him because it’s especially true of him. Notably so. That’s the point.
It is true that everyone dies. That’s a problem. For everyone. Especially people with stage four cancer. That’s why it’s notable. It’s especially true.
I didn’t simply say that. I said a lot. I can’t say it any better.I mean, sure, I guess my question was more pertaining to what situations is it where the part of his stride that gets him into trouble, is it just the initial first step only from a stand-still position, or is it one of these things where his weakness is in the first two, three, or four strides overall?
Simply saying that the guy doesn't look good when not moving really doesn't leave much, considering that I can think of three instances where a player isn't necessarily moving their feet in the play: a defenseman that is standing still is doing so because he is covering an area of the ice where the puck likely isn't, he is in a board battle tie up, or a face-off. I'm less worried about his movement when the puck is on the right half-wall and he is on the left side of the crease, because as the puck gets transitioned, I am more worried about him tracking with vision which forces him to move his feet at least some. If you are referring to his ability to react when the puck is close to him and he is jamming in the corners or along the boards, then I see where the concern is because if the opposition comes away with the puck, they are likely going to be able to beat him in a certain lane. Context was all I was asking for, but it didn't come across that way with what I said.
I didn’t simply say that. I said a lot. I can’t say it any better.