Calad
Section 422
What if, instead of penalty shots after overtime there were 2v1 rushes inthe same manner until a winner was decided?
That sounds ridiculous. It would never work.I say we use an element from the game of hockey but repurpose it in a way that breaks a tie. Like how about the penalty shot
What if, and hear me out on this.
What if, after OT if the game is still tied, it just ends and both teams get 1 point?
Trash idea. Hockey is amazing but one of it's faults is traditionalists who want things to be a way because it was a way at one time.
Ties are bad for the game. There is nothing worse than an amazing game being decided in a shootout. If the game just ended with no winner it would be even worse.
Besides, what you described essentially already happens. Each team gets a point for going to OT. If someone wins in OT OR in the shootout they get an extra point.
My idea: if a game is tied after OT an octagon will be erected at center ice and both team's mascots will compete in an MMA match consisting of 3 5 minute rounds using the unified rules. Mario Yamasaki will be the referee to ensure that if one of the combatants is being beaten badly the fight will continue until said combatant dies.
There is nothing worse than an amazing game being decided in a shootout. If the game just ended with no winner it would be even worse.
It's got nothing to do with being a traditionalist. I'm all of 27 years old.
Maybe it's merely the Soccer fan speaking but I just think ties are fine.
I think it's better for fan entertainment to always have one team "win". Now I think it's annoying to lose in a shootout, but at least there's a conclusive result.
(anyways, shootouts came from soccer first so you should appreciate them )
Get rid of the shootout, bring back ties and use the soccer system of 3 points for a win and one point for a draw.