One M0RE YEAR
Registered User
- Jun 5, 2013
- 229
- 0
volchenkov at 4m per is a disaster...
I prefer to think of it as a captain taking over a ship and under his watch it sinks. Or a security guard replacing someones shift and under his watch a breakin occurs. As the GM its his job to make the moves to make this team as good as it can be and imo he made some choices that set us back before finally going with the rebuild.This is an pretty superficial way of looking at the situation.
If someone smokes for 40 years and quits at the age of 60 to replace the habit with Nicorette and then is diagnosed with lung cancer, what should the doctors conclude?
"Huh, the cancer must be from the nicorette. Doing something unhealthy for years and then quitting won't have any lasting consequence."
Have to think Tim Murray is going to be pulling the strings fairly soon.
He literally contributed NOTHING to the Sens though, he rode the coattails of a team built nearly entirely by Marhsall Johnston/ Pierre Gauthier.
He took a team with Championship potential, and added almost literally nothing to it over his entire 6-year tenure. He had a deplorable draft record, his trades were almost all flops, he screwed Hossa - which in turn gave Ottawa a horrible rep around the league for years...
Dude. When the only good thing about a GM was that they guys who were there before he got there, who were brought in by his predecessors, played up to expectations... I dunno man. That's pretty bad. That's almost "ALL bad".
I prefer to think of it as a captain taking over a ship and under his watch it sinks. Or a security guard replacing someones shift and under his watch a breakin occurs. As the GM its his job to make the moves to make this team as good as it can be and imo he made some choices that set us back before finally going with the rebuild.
In fairness to Mucks (who I can't stand as a GM) he was brought in to win now. His deadline deals were all about sacrificing the future for the present.
His abysmal pre-Ottawa draft record notwithstanding, he actually didn't do too badly considering where we finished in the standings. Of course the colossul blunder of picking Brian Lee with our gift of a 9th pick will forever overshadow the Nick Foligno's and other players that at least became NHL players, though unspectacular ones. Meszaros, Greening, Condra, Gryba, Daugavins, Eaves, Elliott etc...
Maybe the best move Murray ever made was hamstringing Muckler. God knows how bad things could have gotten had he not done so.
So yeah Murray inherited a mess, added to it in my opinion, but has done a good job with the rebuild, and most of the trades he's made in recent years.
A little defensive dont you think? I'm not giving him a ten. I never said anything about you. Guy made what i perceive as some moves that set the organization back, particularly at the back end. Made me sick that we had to hear about how we lacked a PMD and seeing how we were hemmed in our own end after moving mezaroes and Corvo. Then panicking and trading for campoli. Despite what people say imo LeClaire was never good. If we had no intention of resigning volchenkov we should have traded him off the sinking ship that was our team at the time. Helping Emery with his problems would have been the right thing to do rather then giving up on him after 6 years in the organization.
Do you think the team would have been better had we kept mezaroes and corvo over campoli or had we kept emery over leclaire. IMO we would have.
Murray's mistakes led to us missing the playoffs for the first time in 11 years imo. I give Murray tons of credit for successfully rebuilding the team but i also am not happy with some of the moves related to why we had to rebuild the team.
True Dat!In fairness to Mucks (who I can't stand as a GM) he was brought in to win now. His deadline deals were all about sacrificing the future for the present.
True Dat!I prefer to think of it as a captain taking over a ship and under his watch it sinks. Or a security guard replacing someones shift and under his watch a breakin occurs. As the GM its his job to make the moves to make this team as good as it can be and imo he made some choices that set us back before finally going with the rebuild.
We went from Stanley Cup contenders to a first round Playoff Team under Murray!
But now knowing that Melnyk put a clamp on the salary Cap, I can't blame Murray!
Now that's just rude.....I guess people are just happy being short sighted, it must be a lot less complicated.
meh lost it but Eaves is a fringe NHLer and so is CorvoStillman, Commondore for Corvo and Eaves .
- 3rd rounder only flat out loss in my opinionWhatever we traded for filatov .
They drafted him......Leclaire and dont give me that bs that we knew wed get lehner.
/Mezaroes trade was terrible considering he was a top ranked RFA at the time
what would you have done? Do you not think they tried to trade them?imo buying out Emery and butler was also unnecessary
yeah you want him at 4.5 million good call.... See how they feel about your 6th D at that price tag injersey.Losing volchenkov was kinda bad too
He's made some mistakes but in the end he's turned most of them into positives.
As poorly as Muckler did with drafting his tenure coincided with our best years as a franchise in terms of results: I don't think we missed the playoffs while he was the GM
He gets too much hate; he wasn't ALL bad
meh lost it but Eaves is a fringe NHLer and so is Corvo
- 3rd rounder only flat out loss in my opinion
They drafted him......
They couldn't afford him, Kuba had two really really good seasons here better then any Meszaros had after they traded him.
what would you have done? Do you not think they tried to trade them?
yeah you want him at 4.5 million good call.... See how they feel about your 6th D at that price tag injersey.
I agree with this, but they haven't made many mistakes. I think money has come into play and hand cuffed them a few times like this summer. This team with Gonchar and Alfie over Corvo and Mac would be downright scary.
Meszaros was king of pucks bouncing off him into our net his last year here. We replaced him with a good PMD in Kuba.
Letting go of Corvo... meh.
I agree about Leclaire. He had one okay (not even great) season that got overrated because of his shutout total and the fact that he played for Columbus. Every other year he was mediocre and injured.
By far he's not the worst gm but we did miss the playoffs under his watch for the first time in like 10 years or something. My major issues were with the moves that went on with our back end. I was not happy with the departures of corvo and mezaroes. Imo it made us alot weaker. Volchenkov was a good player in ottawa which is the reason why he got such a good contract from the devils. As a rebuilding team i'm sure we could have at least gotten some sort of return. Leclaire's numbers were weak in columbus and he wasnt known for is health, we knew what we were getting into.
Emery had his issues but he only had one bad season before being bought and imo he was better then gerber, elliott and leclaire. Career wise Emery's numbers have been consistently ok outside that one year.
You can possibly question his decision in hiring paddock, Hartsburgh and clouston too.
By no means am i calling him a bad gm but i'm certainly not giving him a 10/10.
The coaching hires were definitely problematic. I have to disagree about moving Meszaros, though. He was asking for way too much for a guy not named Karlsson, coming off his ELC. Especially with the cap sitting where it was at the time.
Disagree about Volchenkov, as well. Based on his style of play, letting him go was the right thing to do. Again the cap was a factor.
This team is his at this point, and is trending upwards, notwithstanding the western road trip. Personally I would give him somewhere between 7 and 8.
We went from Stanley Cup contenders to a first round Playoff Team under Murray!
But now knowing that Melnyk put a clamp on the salary Cap, I can't blame Murray!
I'd probably give him a 7. I'm happy with him for the most part but i think having a PMD and keeping Emery.
Man emery was a complete cancer, do you not remember him showing up late for practices, and getting in fights at practices with neil and mcgrattan, and at that time Gerber had taken the reigns as the starter. We were better off without him.
I'd probably give him a 7. I'm happy with him for the most part but i think having a PMD and keeping Emery.
Man emery was a complete cancer, do you not remember him showing up late for practices, and getting in fights at practices with neil and mcgrattan, and at that time Gerber had taken the reigns as the starter. We were better off without him.
Ya i remember. The guy was going through a difficult time. For all the other years he was with us he was from what i remember a good teammate and a competent goalie. Emery was problem we needed to fix, we couldn't afford to get rid of him and set the organization back. Judging by how Emery has returned to the NHL it was wrong to let him go.
I actually dont remember him and neil fighting. I remember him going to the wrong arena, missing practices, fighting Mcgrattan(who had his own issues) and saying the cops were rascist.
This is an pretty superficial way of looking at the situation.
If someone smokes for 40 years and quits at the age of 60 to replace the habit with Nicorette and then is diagnosed with lung cancer, what should the doctors conclude?
"Huh, the cancer must be from the nicorette. Doing something unhealthy for years and then quitting won't have any lasting consequence."
We didn't feel the negative effects of Muckler's regime until years later. The 2010-2011 team that hit rock-bottom was in a downward spiral due to injuries, Muckler's lack of foresight, the loss of a superstar (Heatley), and a poor coach. How many of those factors should we pin on Murray? I count one - the coach.
The dive in the standings was the after-effect of years of poor drafting. Take a look at the prospects thread and scroll down to Muckler's picks:
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=1494213
Not many of them there. No one's saying you have to change your opinion, feel free to give Murray whatever ranking you want. I'm not giving him a '10' either, but people are disputing what you've said because many of the trades that you listed as 'bad' were far from bad deals. Really, you wish we had kept Volchenkov? Muckler did some great things in his time as well, culminating in a SCF appearance.
Thus far, none of Murray's moves have proven to be franchise-crippling, and in fact, he's laid a very solid foundation for us to build on (Karlsson, Turris, Zibanejad, Ryan, Lehner, Anderson, Methot, etc.). Maybe you can count Heatley, but the guy turned into a pylon about two years later and it ended up being a blessing in disguise. I know Muckler isn't entirely to blame for the loss of Chara, Hossa, and Havlat, but I can't help but shake my head when I hear those names and think about what might have gone differently if they'd stuck around.
The real villain to blame here: the salary cap. Could not have been worse timing.
We're a mediocre team.
Thanks for...being average?
I'll fall over myself thanking Murray when a championship is delivered, or at the very least a first-place team in the standings that goes on a very, very, very deep playoff run. He's done well in some areas but has anyone forgotten four coaches, countless bad contracts, one playoff round won in close to ten years?
I love Murray as a scout/youth analyst (though I prefer Tim in that capacity) but as a finisher? Not so much.
I'm acting like he's an NHLer. Something that Brodeur, Leclaire, Auld, Glass, ect ect were not.