Brent Burns Beard
Powered by Vasiliev Podsloven
- Feb 27, 2002
- 5,595
- 581
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story.asp?id=112108
" ... you don't want a situation where teams on the bottom can afford only a $25-million payroll and teams at the top can spend $80 million to $90 million on players."
a) if bottom teams can only afford 25m and the NHL is opposed to significant revenue sharing, how will their proposal help anything ?
b) if the goal is to not have teams with a payroll over 80m (or even 50m), why not work with the players to construct a tax that makes it so that it can never happen.
Surely others see this inconsistency.
i feel that if this statement were true and not just cliche to fuel ignorance, then there offer doesnt resolve it and the players offer does at least offer a model to address it. the owners model EXASPERATES the problem since each team must spend over 34m. didint he just say some teams can only afford 25m ? which teams are those by the way ?
i know the players are being stubborn, but the owners are being bullies and for no good reason other than they have decided it is better to play hangmans bluff.
dr
" ... you don't want a situation where teams on the bottom can afford only a $25-million payroll and teams at the top can spend $80 million to $90 million on players."
a) if bottom teams can only afford 25m and the NHL is opposed to significant revenue sharing, how will their proposal help anything ?
b) if the goal is to not have teams with a payroll over 80m (or even 50m), why not work with the players to construct a tax that makes it so that it can never happen.
Surely others see this inconsistency.
i feel that if this statement were true and not just cliche to fuel ignorance, then there offer doesnt resolve it and the players offer does at least offer a model to address it. the owners model EXASPERATES the problem since each team must spend over 34m. didint he just say some teams can only afford 25m ? which teams are those by the way ?
i know the players are being stubborn, but the owners are being bullies and for no good reason other than they have decided it is better to play hangmans bluff.
dr