Having those players on a team gives you a bias that they should win every other year, making the years they don't look like a conspicuous failure.
From this perspective, six straight years without a Cup seems like a titanic catastrophe.
However, what you want is a more traditional configuration, presumably to lessen the pain of failure that comes with (artificially) higher expectations.
There's no reason to believe that actually trading either of these players would increase the odds of winning a Stanley Cup for the foreseeable future. You won't get the value you would assume, and you would have to assume a greater emphasis on roster building through the draft, which has been the real failure around here.
Maybe you want the players traded so that it would limit management's proclivity towards short-term trades. Still, that's a big risk.
I get it, you'd rather have the mystery box with the hopes that a radical change would mean a big payoff. Most people's opinion seems to be that the evidence points towards failures surrounding those two players. Cashing in those players on the market still doesn't solve the biggest problems in Penguins management.
They're locked up with increasingly cap friendly deals for their career. They've won at least one Cup. They're still elite, if not dominant anymore. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water.
Ladies and Gents... a secret I will share with you.
Stop letting one poster take over a thread. It's an insanely weak argument and nobody agrees. Just let the individual post and post and post. When nobody responds - it will die off.
Jesus.. there is no need to explain to someone why trading Sid/Geno is dumb. If the question needs to be asked, there is no rational way you will get through to that individual. Just stop it.
Ladies and Gents... a secret I will share with you.
Stop letting one poster take over a thread. It's an insanely weak argument and nobody agrees. Just let the individual post and post and post. When nobody responds - it will die off.
One thing that doesn't get talked about NEARLY enough is using Crosby and Malkin on the PK...ESPECIALLY when you run into early penalty trouble. You are playing into the opponents' hands when you don't do this.
It's so dumb to sit down two of the game's best, no matter what the situation calls for. Getting them into the game early reaps massive benefits late.
Hell, I guarantee you Sid and Geno won't have time to look disinterested if you increase their responsibilities.
The game situation should NOT determine ice time for our two best players. We need to adjust to them. So if we get 3 straight penalties in the first 10 minutes, those two still need to get the appropriate ice time.
The sad truth is if Craig Adams were dressed last night, he'd have played more than Sid or Geno early on.
Our next coach needs to understand bench management better, and also needs to play both of our horses in every situation, and use them early so they can get into the game.
This is basic, kindergarten stuff really!
Look up Koivu and Parise's cap hits. They cost roughly 14.25 million per year together. Also, what makes you think the Wild would take on Scuderi's contract in the trade? You said yourself that no team would take on that contract.
You have confirmed my suspicion that you have no idea how the trade market works.
2 things on your fantastic post:
1) The Breakout: This is the one aspect where you can fault injuries and you can fault the Despres trade. The d-men were just swinging the puck up the board as hard as they could and hoping for a chip out to safety. Ironically... at times it even worked because it didn't let the Rangers pinch their dman in. We sprung a couple 3 on 2s and even 2 on 1s early in the 2nd because the Rangers were trying to pinch in on it. They quickly backed off the rest of the game when they found out the Pens defense refused to skate the puck to safety or make a direct pass. It was weird.
I've never been one to blame injuries. This is one situation where I have to. It killed our possession. It killed our transition. It murdered our forwards because they had to work every shift trying to make it work.
2) Identity: We've talked about it for years. We want to be fast and big. It's not plausible. I was watching Anaheim last night and they kept talking about Anaheim struggling against fast teams (1-6 I believe was the record) during the 2nd period when WPG was taking it to them. They committed to being big. Chicago committed to being skilled and not focused on hits. LA focused on being big. Rangers focused on being fast and furious. Isles, too.
Bottom line - PICK AN IDENTITY. Develop your own. Just pick one and build on it. That's all.
Everybody laughed when we had guys like Vitale, TK, Letestu, Farny, etc.... but the thing is - it works. It actually works when used properly. The line went out and played fast/furious.
It's been proven for YEARS since the lockout what it takes to win because of how systematic the game has become, and how lax the enforcement of the rules has once again become.
You need speed AND/OR size. That's it. That's the list. Speed to cause chaos on the forecheck like the Rangers and Hawks, or size to be able to pound a team into submission like the Kings. If you can have both, more power to you.
Defensively, again I'll use the 'Hawks as an example. The 'Hawks (except for Roszival who is ****ing awful) have 5 guys that can transition and basically play forward, making every foray into the offensive zone 5 on 5 in the purest sense. There is no Rob Scuderi "shooting wide on purpose" because he doesn't have the puck skills of an ECHL d-man.
But what do our paid pros do? They acquire the worst combination of traits in almost every position, almost as if they didn't bother to actually scout anyone or worse still, don't see the way the League itself is trending.
Big guys who can't hit
Small guys who aren't fast
And the biggest offense of all: acquiring smallish defensemen with the thought that they will sacrifice size and physicality because they'll be able to move the puck surgically and get involved in the offense once the cycle is established. But guess what a-holes, you can't do that with Scuderi and Lovejoy as stalwarts.
A dozen of us here can right now quit our jobs, head to the CEC and do a better job assembling a team for TODAY'S game than these ****ing morons. I used to say stuff like that tongue-in-cheek, but now I actually believe it.
I MUST BE STUPID not understanding why everyone wants them together when they can't win or even come close. Funny thing is the team that will win the cup this season won't have Crosby or Malkin on their team. Fluke I guess lol
Jesus Christ. Phil Bourque on Savran's show saying that if you put Plum high schoolers out with Sid and Geno, they should be able to produce. It's Sid and Geno's fault. They have to find a way.
This organization is just not likable. I'm sick of guys with zero talent riding Mario's coattails telling me how the game is played. Why don't you go revise your menu at that Blue Line Grille Mario got you, Phil.
Ladies and Gents... a secret I will share with you.
Stop letting one poster take over a thread. It's an insanely weak argument and nobody agrees. Just let the individual post and post and post. When nobody responds - it will die off.
Jesus.. there is no need to explain to someone why trading Sid/Geno is dumb. If the question needs to be asked, there is no rational way you will get through to that individual. Just stop it.
Yeah, I feel the same way about that jagoff.
He was plug and play type player who thought that he was more important than he actually was for those great teams.
It's like the guy doesn't watch any hockey and doesn't understand that this isn't what the League is anymore.
"Phil, a caller earlier said that the reason Sid and Geno can't get going is because the transition game from the back end isn't very good right now"
"IF YOU'RE GREAT PLAYERS PROVE IT!!! IT DOESN'T MATTER IF NOBODY CAN GET YOU THE PUCK OR DO ANYTHING WITH IT ONCE THEY GET IT FROM YOU!!!"
Datsyuk made some amazing single handed plays last night that makes you wonder why Sid/Geno can't do it...so who the hell knows.
Good post. Agree totally.
I know it sounds stupid, but I firmly believe that swapping out every below average skater with the best skating guys from Wilkes-Barre would give us a better chance to win a game in this series than the status quo. This includes guys like Megna, who I don't like a single other thing about his game other than his wheels.
I'd make the same argument about big, physical players, but we don't have any of those in Wilkes-Barre, except, like, Ruopp.
Yeah, I feel the same way about that jagoff.
He was plug and play type player who thought that he was more important than he actually was for those great teams.
It's like the guy doesn't watch any hockey and doesn't understand that this isn't what the League is anymore.
"Phil, a caller earlier said that the reason Sid and Geno can't get going is because the transition game from the back end isn't very good right now"
"IF YOU'RE GREAT PLAYERS PROVE IT!!! IT DOESN'T MATTER IF NOBODY CAN GET YOU THE PUCK OR DO ANYTHING WITH IT ONCE THEY GET IT FROM YOU!!!"
He was plug and play type player who thought that he was more important than he actually was for those great teams.
"
Good post. Agree totally.
I know it sounds stupid, but I firmly believe that swapping out every below average skater with the best skating guys from Wilkes-Barre would give us a better chance to win a game in this series than the status quo. This includes guys like Megna, who I don't like a single other thing about his game other than his wheels.