Tact
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2006
- 2,417
- 1,279
Barry Trots will cost lots of $$$. FA will not be interested in that.He has structure and look at Islanders roster. I really don't understand why they fired him...
Barry Trots will cost lots of $$$. FA will not be interested in that.He has structure and look at Islanders roster. I really don't understand why they fired him...
Those players leaving would be in return for assets. If the trades are even then there may be no step back on paper.No Miller and Garland and (?) next year and it’s going to be interesting to see what the step back might be.
Don’t see why not. He just hired a big management team.Barry Trots will cost lots of $$$. FA will not be interested in that.
He has structure and look at Islanders roster. I really don't understand why they fired him...
I find it VERY interesting that Lou fires Trotz too. I mean Trotz is sort of Lou's guy.You're not sure why Lou Lamoriello fired a coach? The same Lou Lamoriello that twice fired a coach the same season those teams went on to win the Stanley Cup. He goes through more coaches than any other GM. Us mortals do not need to comprehend his coaching decisions.
What JR/PA wants, JR/PA gets.Barry Trots will cost lots of $$$. FA will not be interested in that.
He would be a great choice in my mind...but if Bruce wants back, he is the coach and few could complain about that.I would be elated if we could land Barry Trotz. He's the kind of coach that would help players like Pettersson, Horvat and Boeser become the 2-way players we need them to be. He'd bring a lot of structure allowing Demko to find another level to his game.
I find it VERY interesting that Lou fires Trotz too. I mean Trotz is sort of Lou's guy.
His structure is only good for playoffs, and it is so fxxking boring for the regular season.He has structure and look at Islanders roster. I really don't understand why they fired him...
He had Trotz in NY for 4 years, Babcock in Toronto for 3 years, and two of his head coaches in the Devils resigned due to health problems. If you remove the interim coaches, the ratio is similar to any other GM in the league.You're not sure why Lou Lamoriello fired a coach? The same Lou Lamoriello that twice fired a coach the same season those teams went on to win the Stanley Cup. He goes through more coaches than any other GM. Us mortals do not need to comprehend his coaching decisions.
It can be boring but if win, why complain? 14 playoffs in 23 seasons, 1 Stanley Cup and Vegas didn't win it.His structure is only good for playoffs, and it is so fxxking boring for the regular season.
No one complains when it is winning, but it is a different story when you miss the playoff. It is the same as Darryl.It can be boring but if win, why complain? 14 playoffs in 23 seasons, 1 Stanley Cup and Vegas didn't win it.
When the team is up 1 in the final 5 mins with a PP, only the pro gurus will be on the PP to cycle the puck to protect the lead. As I said, no one will complain if NYI is in the playoff. Will Canucks be in the playoff next season? if not, he is not a good option.Were the Capitals a boring team to watch under Trotz? I think his boring style has something to do with the pieces he has to work with.
Lol FA signs the cheque - so absolutely notWhat JR/PA wants, JR/PA gets.
FAQ is barred from hockey ops.
Caps teams under his guidance were fun.No one complains when it is winning, but it is a different story when you miss the playoff. It is the same as Darryl.
This team won’t be bottom 5 potential next season.The next 2 seasons should be dedicated to retooling this team, and playoffs shouldn't be a realistic goal.
I wonder if BB has been told they are definitely going to lose top talent this offseason... At his age would he want to coach a team with bottom 5 potential? Do we want a guy coaching a bottom 5 potential team way above expectation? If any team could use a generational lotto pick next year, it's the Canucks.
This team won’t be bottom 5 potential next season.
A lot people gloss over the fact that the team was unusually healthy this year. Outside of a couple missed games due to covid, there wasn't any serious time missed due to injury. Given the teams history and travel, I don't see this repeating but who knows. (The Canucks man games lost to injury numbers were inflated by Ferland, Sutter, etc.)Subtract a Miller and it already looks grim... Our top 4 defence besides QH is one of the worst looking in the league